BPSC PT Result 2011 – Declared
Please find result on official website of BPSC. Great opportunity for all those who have qualified. BPSC came out with candidate friendly result by declaring 15000+ result.
So keep up your preparations. Also those candidates who missed this time should pull up their socks and start working hard for future exams.
All the best!!!!
check result at :-
dear sir
do u think that there could be mistake while uploading d result..as so many of my friends having roll series of 111700to 799 cud not make in to mains inspite of ding well in exam.there score is beteen 115 to 120. what steps can be taken against bpsc to get justice for them. pls guide.
regards
Wail till 20th when d marks obtained by them would be published.
Till then ralax. Once u find any discripency into ur marks and cut off, then consult to d bpsc.
plz wait till 20th July…….on that day marksheet of individual candidate will be uploaded..
so many cases r there, where students r perplexed.they have scored well above 104, yet rejected?this shows biasedness.we must protest
i m sure i did 112 correct answers yet my roll does not figure! afterall ir is BPSC and it will remain so
mine was also 112 bt missed soif u want to fight against bpsc through legal steps then u may join me on ravisj83@gmail.com. thanx
Hi ……i hope u must have got ur marks by now…….even i’ve got only 93 markswhile i was expecting 103 to 108….after exams i went through several solutions published by various coaching centres & i was almost sure for my positive result but got disappointed. I M GOING TO FILE A PETITION UNDER RTI….just for my satisfaction….i think
u and ur friends mst do so.
@ runa..what will u get after filing RTI..nothing but again they will give u a marksheet which u hv alrdy got from BPSC website..so directly go to the HIGH COURT and file a petiion over there..i m mobilising all those candidates who have crossed d cut off bt their roll did not apear in result.so if u r interested then pls join me on above givn my e mail id……
regards
i will as accd to key provided by bpsc i got 108 out of 142 but my marks accd to bpsc is 101..it is never possible
Respected Sir,
My Roll no. is 219692 (SC category student)
My score in PT is 107 and I was happy with the marks though my guess was 112.
But when BPSC declared the answer key and I matched it with my answers I found that it should be 113. (I am 110% sure).
Though I am qualified for mains, what if a person wants to appeal regarding the marks of PT. Please tell me the process. (I have already e-mailed this message to BPSC, no reply yet. )
Thank you.
if u r qualified then u should not waste tym in all dis, concentrate on mains. PT marks are not added so no issues.
Prashad ji Chup Chap Mains Dejeay …..Jyada Dimag mat Lagayeay…..
Jis ped pe baithe hai use kata nahi karte..
Boss is always right
and if he is wrong then he is also right…
Ye official hamare desh ke aise hi hai
Faltu ki ladai na …an….na….!!1
Is bpsc result come more?about 10000 for wrong questions(8)
dear sir,
do u think dat there cud b mistake while uploading d result..as so many of mine frnd cud not make in to mains having roll no. Series 111700 to 799 inspite of vry gud score , their score vary between 115 to 120. So what legal step shoud we take to get justice for them. Pls guide us.
Regards
dear sir,
plz can u upload the chemistry mains exam syllabus…. I tried hard but i couldn’t find anywhere….
i will be extremely grateful to u….
thanx in advance…
Sir,
I was getting around 106-110 with the keys you provided as well as I have verified through the internet. Yet, my roll no. doesn’t appear in the list. What can I do? They said they will publish the score card on the website, but will they publish the “answer keys” which they have used for evaluation?
BPSC ka Answer key dekhkar hi kucch kaha ja sakta hai.
i did 112 bt still missing so if u fight against bpsc through legal measures then u may join me on..ravisj83@gmail.com
with the key provided i got 108 out of142 but my marks accd to bpsc is 101..it is never possible i will fight
Hai anubhuti sir !
i have cleared pre exam.
you have provided a good discussion platform for us .
please guide us in mains also by suggesting books and material in gs,p.a.,l.s.w.
Thank you.
Pratapji mera bhi maths optional hai. Plz mujhe ashu_sonu@india.com par mail karen
Sorry maine mains ko maths padh liya…par mail aap abhi bhi karen. Hum gs par to baat kar hi sakte hain
Sonu Bhai, Mains kitne no. ka hota hai koi idea hai to batao yaar…
Dear anubhuti sir,
my score was 98 and i am from general category but due to high scoring cut off of 104 for general i couldn’t clear the prelims. anyway thanks a lot for providing us solution and answering our queries regarding BPSC. Hope that in future also you will do the same. thanks once again,
Manoj Pandey
better luck next times manoj ji.
Had 109/Gen, still missing frm d list……………….cant do anythng but to wait for marks
mine 112 bt still missing so if u fight against bpsc through legal measures then u may join me on..ravisj83@gmail.com
hi,i m qualified pt. my subjects are geography and history. please contact on this subjects topic.
hi v.k singh ji,my subjects r anthro and geography.as i m frm medical bckground n this ws my ist attemt so dont hav much idea abt geography but its my subject f interest .can u plz guide me
Dear Sir,
I have cleared prelims.Please provide some guidance for Physics+psychology.
Anush.
I qualified for mains exam. My optional papers P.A & History. Pl. submit material of P.A.
My I.D- ranjanfci@yahoo.com
Thanks,
Rakesh Ranjan, Roll-167127
My sitting code is 145471 which is in the displayed list but my roll no. 145516 is not there.what should i drawn conclusion from this.my crrct answer 106 to 109,is it possible that my siting code has alloted to other candidate as his roll no?anubhuti ji help me on this.
i scored 112 but still missing from d pt list.so if u want to fight against BPSC for d cause den u may contact me on ravisj83@gmail.com
sir, please send me previous year question for political science and mathematics.
thanks
santosh kumar
Hi, my subjects are political science and histroy. any body having subject as political science can contact to dharambirksingh@gmail.com
ROLL NO-167222.CALCULATED SCORE 109. YET NOT SELECTED,HELP OUT
i did 112 bt not qualified so if u want to fight against BPSC for d cause den pls joine me ..on. ravissj83@gmail.com
dear anubhuti ji …
thanx for providing information relating to BPSC . I have qualified in PRELIM and now i am going to prepare for MAINS .
One of my optional subject is PHYSICS . I want to knw is ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING also an option subject in BPSC ?
IF yes kindly provide the SYLLABUS of PHYSICS , ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & GENERAL STUDIES . Thanks .
hi………….frnds
and respected sir……..according your answer keys i got 112 marks but unable to crack the pt
dear frnds mine score was also 112 bt still missing frm d qualified list so if u want to fight against bpsc through legal measures then u may contact me on my id.ravisj83@gmail.com
Friends, Can anyone tell me scheme of mains exam. i.e detailed maximum marks break up of subjects in the mains..Thanx a lot in advance.
general studies 1 and 2 each 200 marks (so 400) .. similarly each optional is of 400 marks 200 per paper … so total marks is of 1200marks…there will be hindi compulsory of100 marks
Thanx Anish..So will hindi be only qualifying in nature? How much worth interview consist of?
Hindi is qualifying and Interview is of 200 marks.
@ anish …
can u plz tell me what are the subjects which we can take as options .. ???
Hi friends
Any speculations about probable mains dates ?
…
Success doesn’t mean the absence of failures; it means the attainment of ultimate objectives. It means winning the war, not every battle.
Edwin C. Bliss?
…
Success doesn’t mean the absence of failures; it means the attainment of ultimate objectives. It means winning the war, not every battle.
Edwin C. Bliss?
Hi friends
Any speculations about probable mains dates ?
…
Success doesn’t mean the absence of failures; it means the attainment of ultimate objectives. It means winning the war, not every battle.
Edwin C. Bliss?
Hi friends
Any speculations about probable mains dates ?
…
Success doesn’t mean the absence of failures; it means the attainment of ultimate objectives. It means winning the war, not every battle.
Hello friends….can anyone give a reliable idea when the mains will be held….before/after UPSC mains. Secondly, pls upload the Pub Ad syllabus if possible. thans
Mai pre pass kar gaya hu sir Ji aur filhal mains ki taiyaari kar rha hu. Thanks.
hey friends, I am a general candidate and cleared the PT exam
any one with sociology and public ad as optional…
dear anubhuti sir, please upload 2009 mains questen paper for LSW, History and GS. I am working in Kerala, hence no books are available here
any body plz tell me what the optional subjects available for BPSC mains …
bpsc has given the marksheet ….but its not released the answer key used by them,whether they will publish it or not????..i have got 103 marks….
go highcourt and ask ans. seet
go to high court thats only way…
i m going to high court to get justice as i did 112 but could not make it….so if u r interested then pls contact me at………ravisj83@gmail.com
dear anbhuti ji
mine score was 112 acording to your answer key & also cross checked from wikipedia but tdy bpsc has published my score is95.. i m still not able to digest it..what cud b done… its request to all d candidates, who have scored more dan bpsc cut off but still missig in pt result, to join hand together to fight against whatsoever mistake done by bpsc through LEGAL measures. anyone interested can contact m on my email id…..ravisj83@gmail.com
thanks & regards
Dear Rajiv ji
Ask photo copy of your answer sheet under RTI act,Recently supreme court deliver the judgement that answer booklet can be provided to applicant.BPSC is bound to provide your answer booklet under RTI act,then your claim will be sustainable with proof and there is no option before BPSC rather than declare you successful.
yes, you should go high court i’m also going
ok then pls contact me at ravisj83@gmail.com..we will fight together…two people have alrdy contacted me to fight for d cause..so join hands together.
regards
i have cleared preliminary. plez help me for public administration and urdu optionals.
You may contact Prof. Safdar Imam Quadri, Head, Department of Urdu, College of Commerce, Patna on safdarimamquadri@gmail.com or on 9430466321.
plez tell me the probable date for MAINS.
anubhuti sir kya koi legal procedure hai kyuki mai 2 marks se qualify nahi ho paya ye koi kaise kah sakta hai ki delete qn me se 2 qn v sahi nahi kar sakte bpsc ki galati student par kyo daala jay isbar to 570 seat hai phir result 19000 se v kam kaise diya ja sakta hai
yes amit ..hum sab saath milkar high court me justice k liye ja sakte hai. maine bhi 112 sahi kiya tha but selection nahi hua….so if u r interested then pls contact me at….ravisj83@gmail.com
may any one can send me mains 2009 paper for GS, History and LSW at rajranjan1979@gmail.com.
geography aur pub add (hindi madhyam) se koi student
brajeshhata10@gmail.com
hi everybody i hv cleared pt. My optional are history and lsw.what is the expected date of mains..
Interview is of 150 marks only! I used to think that it is of 200…..
bpsc has released the model ans keys.but the question , they have made invalid or wrong is highly questionable.as many as 8 questions have been deleted.in this scenario results have become discriminating. even bpsc has to make their ground for deleting these question public.
sir as per bpsc answer key i got 112 marks but bpsc gives me 102
can i do any legal procedure
Just file RTI and ask for photocopy of answer sheet and after getting same you can confirm your answer and it will be an evidence for your claim and BPSC will bound to give your right.
bpsc kuch aur result add kar raha hai, is this news true or false? can anybody clear it? i got 102 marks, so please help me and clear my doubt for that news.
aur result nikalna hota to bpsc mains ke apply ka date nahi nikalta. Agar court jana hai to jaldi jao mains lene ke bad court bhi bpsc ko hi favour karta hai
Mains topic
http://goindocal.com/india-%BB-general–mgnrega%2C-contributing-towards-inclusive-growth–go-1299.htm
http://goindocal.com/india-%BB-general–overcrowdings-is-a-common-issue-in-indian-agriculturego-1302.htm
http://goindocal.com/view_article_details.php?id=1300
http://goindocal.com/view_article_details.php?id=1284
http://goindocal.com/view_article_details.php?id=1281
http://goindocal.com/opinion-%BB-feature-pala-school-of-sculpture-arts%2C-having-%2C-distinct-dimensions-go-1370.htm
anybody wants to appeal against the bpsc , he has valid ground because how a supreme organisation like bpsc can set 8 quns wrong and delete them after examination.this is highly objectionable because 1 marks can be decesive. it shows that bpsc is not competent authority and the members must be punished.so friends you have valid reasons against commission .
anybody who wants to file case against bpsc irregularity in PT result, i will be with them by any means so please contact me and fight for justice together. my mobile no. 7808056700
ravi ji you must go to high court and appeal aganist commission because the bpsc is playing with the future of the students.I am with you and i will be very pleased to help you by any means .please inform me about the progress of the case if you have filed otherwise i will also file the case with you.
yeah sure harshit.we will fight together..i hv posted my no. & other detail so pls contact me.
thanx
ya.if u r go to highcourt against bpsc me and my frnd always with. u. plz disclg u
r cntct no. i m frm muzaffarpur.
ja ke koi faida nai h coz jab objective paper me itna achcha result diya gaya just what happen in mains
@suraj…. we r not discussing here for profit or loss….its a fight against mismanaged & irresponsible/corrupted system so we must raise our voice for d cause so dat precious life of thousands of aspirant can b saved….& for ur kind information, i must remind u abt d last yr,s case where some aspirants like us got d opportunity to take d main examn aftr judgement forwrded by honourable judges of patna high court. hope u have got my point.
thanx & all d best to u
@ All ;It is better to concentrate for 2012…..it is wasting of time and money it is not easy to fight with the institution because they will identify you and target u as well….
So better to prepare for next chance
ja ke koi faida nai h coz jab objective paper me itna achcha result diya gaya just imagine what happen in mains
thanx to all who supported d cause… anyaway some of u have alrdy mailed me to fight together but again some more r raising d voice so those people who r interested in filing a petition latest by 27/28th of july may contact me directly at 9199979190 or alternatively they can e mail me at…
ravisj83@gmail.com
thanx®ard
i not want to just appear in mains…………..
i got 112 marks as answer key provided by bpsc but bpsc gives me only 102
i m economically very weak and i gave my best in exam and after pt i started for mains. i did tuition for buy good books for mains and trying to everything for mains……..
now if i go to court then bpsc must target me
i am now 100% sure i can not qualify in mains
i not want to just appear in mains
finally i decided i never appear for bpsc because i not want to be part of this corrupt system
those who are going to court my best wishes are always with them
go to court and be part of this system and try to change this
ALL THE BEST
court is only option for bpsc pt result 2011. last year 14 questions were wrong, this year is 08 wrong questions, is this a Commission which is unable to set 150 correct questions in bpsc pt. this is very pity to BPSC Commission itself
it is habitual fault of BPSC and chronic to set 10 to 20 questions wrong and mislead to aspirants to BPSC. is this not erode confidance of the Students and authenticity of the BPSC.
only solution is to cancel the BPSC pt EXAm and take to fresh exam in this regard. credibility of BPSC is at Stake/risk. the last year the patna high court has cancelled the pt exam . but the double bench has reinstated the pt result. so in principle, the high court taken cognigence that the exam shoul cancelled in in first instance.
if the matter come before the high court, Patna, this is the moral blow to BPSC that tthe every year set 10 to 20 questions sert wrong , according to BPSC itself.
those who are going to court, we are supporting morally, and so on , if contacted. god bless u and god bless bihar
आप का केस बहुत मजबूत है, BPSC के खिलाफ 100% निर्णय आयेगा, कोर्ट ऐसी अनियमितताओँ पर पूर्व मे कडा रुख अपनाता रहा है, अपने अधिकार के लिये लड़ेँ,हो सकता है आपका यह कदम आपका भाग्य ही बदल दे ।गुमराह करने वालो पर ध्यान न देँ,शीध्रता करेँ।आप का केस बहुत मजबूत है, BPSC के खिलाफ 100% निर्णय आयेगा, कोर्ट ऐसी अनियमितताओँ पर पूर्व मे कडा रुख अपनाता रहा है, अपने अधिकार के लिये लड़ेँ,हो सकता है आपका यह कदम आपका भाग्य ही बदल दे ।गुमराह करने वालो पर ध्यान न देँ,शीध्रता करेँ।
halla bolo bpsc ke khilaf,an act dicrimination
the commission has violated the right to equality by arbitrariness
Hi friends,
I have scored 117 but i didn’t get selected and again according to BPSC i have scored only 98 marks.
Now i am totally convinced by the fact that it is impossible for BPSC to conduct a fair examination.
Apart from that, taking into consideration that BPSC have deleted 10 question from its exam, i have certain basic questions:
1. what if some has scored those 10 questions correctly and others not?
2. what relaxation BPSC is providing for those students, who spent more than 30 minutes for those 10 questions, and finally
3. Is the BPSC( as a body) competent enough to conduct the exam?
hey friends i have created my own blog specially for discussing BPSC PT RESULT & DISCRIPENCIES therein. there fore i request all of u to kindly join me up right there @ ravijaiswal01.(DISCRIPENCIES IN PT RESULT). so those who r interested to file petition in to the HIGH COURT against BPSC may join right there
thanx.
my point are as follows
1. Last year 14 wrong questions
2. This year 08 Wrong questions
3. Last year the patna high court was cancelled the bpsc Pt result(48-52)
4. it was reinstated by double bench of Patna High Court
5. this is only eroding the confidence of aspiraant
6. Prestige of BPSC at stake/
7. Commission is unable to set 150 correct questions
8. Please reconsider the result of BPSC
9. As published in Hindustan dainik (Patna edition) the Secretary (BPSC) stated that some more result will be given after less 08 marks to announced cut off
10. please maintain the BPSC prestige.
11. we appeal to all right minded people please reconsider the decision
12. if more result declared, please do shortly,
13. some pople are ready to go to the Hon’ble High Court(Patna)
14. The Hon’ble High Court(Patna) is only hope for above mention correction.
15. Hopefully, the BPSC take corrective action, very shortly, thank you all, God bless u, God bless U all, God bless BIHAR, thank u , thank u very much.
if any one has not selected by whom mistake. agar 8 question hata diya gaya to wo sabke liye tha. tum sab ka bash chale to kisi bhi exam. ko na hone do. ye 15000 ladke kaise select ho gaye. unme merit tha jab 15000 me bhi nahi aa paye ho to kya expect rakhte ho tum sab. jao high court kuch nahi hone wala hai. yahan to kisi tarah mains ke liye qualify kar jaoge court ke interfare se lekin mains me kya hoga. pahle mehnat karo phir aage ka socho.
mr singh,
ur comment most welcome.
but, at the same time it seems you dont have any idea about discriminating activities of commission.in a democratic country like ours each and every one has every right to raise their their voice.
as far as the so called meritocracy is concerned,these commissions have been dragged into court for delivering justice to the aggrieved.
it also seems that u r not even the one who have cleared pt.
अगर इतना भरोसा खुद पे है तो हमे किसी के कोर्ट जाने का विरोध नही करना चाहिए VK BHAI GALT BATO KA VIRODH JARURI HAI, SYSTEM KI KHARABI KA VIRODH AAP AUR MAI NAHI KARENGE 2 KAUN KAREGA, KABHI 2 SAB ISKA SHIKAR HO SAKTE HAIN, MERA B PRE HUAA HAI PR MAI COURT JANE KA SAMARTHAK HU ,VARNA YE BHRASTACHARI MAINS ME B YAHI KAM KARENGE TAB MAI AUR AAP INKE SHIKAR HONGE.
hi VK SINGH aap ka suggestion se to yahi lag raha hai ki corruption karne do aur mai to mains me laga rahoo koi baat nahi us 15000 me se 570 hi select honge aur jo nahi honge unme se kuchh log to isi bpsc ke policy ke vajah se nahi ho payege to phir next year aisa hi hoga aur iski saja student ko hi milta rahega chahe vo student mai ya aap ya koi ho ho hoga to student hi to aap ye batao bpsc ki marji chalta rahe ………… aur aap ye v kah rahe 15000 merit wale the yadi koi baat nahi bpsc only 2 ya 3 thousand result deta to aur v meritorious candidate aate isme v 25 question delete to aur v meritorious aate …………. yahi chah rahe hai VK SINGH AAP KI THINKING KI JAI HO BPSC KI JAI HO OOOOOOOOOOOOO i request all of you please sahi ka saath dijiye job to honi hi kisi aur field me thanks anubuti sir jisne ye plateform diye
we have to send copy of pt admit card? Wat is last date to send mains form
@ VK SINGH…dusro ki chinta mat karo…take care of urself & try to find dat where do u stand & whts ur status. respect the views & feelings of others…!!!!!
i know myself but u don,t know yrself mr. ravi. everyone is free for go to court and this process continues what will happen court will cancel the exam. and after this exam. will be held after 6 months or one year and it is not certain that after that result everyone will be satisfy. in 2 lakhs only 15000 will be selected and remaining 185000 will create another problem u can,t satisfy everyone so respect the exam. in upsc also there are many questions in which there is contradiction about the answer than upsc should cancel the exam. contradiction will always in exam. and u can,t remove this. it is our system. and we are in the system we cant change the system we can only utilizes the resouses of the system.
@VK SINGH…….u r nonsense…
who the hell you are V K singh…………your thoughts are unfortunate, but more bizarre is the propensity to argue and defend the indefensible , i m busy now, will get back to this topic again…….
VK SINGH tum iske pichhe kyu ho koi court jaye to achhi baat hai tum chahate ho ki ise exam delay hoga to ye to government ka problem hai jo justice me v itna samay lagata hai yahi to corruption hai dost har jagah bpsc ho ya court ho ya government ho ya tumhare jaise gande insaan jo personal faayade k liye kisi ka v sauda karne ko taiyar rahata ho chutiye kahi ka democracy kya hai pata hi nahi bebkuf
Amit Ji better try next time. The people like you always creating problem to the deserving candidates. Last time I missed mains due to court cases and inordinate delays in the date of mains examination. you people are making BPSC a five year plan. If you want everibody in mains then what is the need of PT exam?
Rajeev ranjan, tera baap aaj jitna paisa kamata hoga na, usse jyada main earn karta hun, and 2005 ke bad aaj tak i never failed in pre………aur i failed in pre, iska mujhe koi dukh bhi nahi. BPSC is not an employment avenue for me, but duffer like u , cant understand dis. Pehle english likhna sikh le, phir mujhe luck wish karna. And, people are opposing , because they feel so, who are u guys to decide whether it is right or wrong, we r not obstructing mains exam or anything, we r moving to judiciary with only a petition and its upto High court to decide to accept or reject the petition………………………and if High court is accepting it, who the hell are u guys to pass the judgement about our moves……………….MInd ur bussiness, and surely we r not the culprit, its, BPSC, who hasbeen repeatedly making joke……………. Show atleast a bit of rationality. Even calling 15000 for mains is a joke, but we r facing it………………Prudence is a high thing to demand, but we can expect a bit from the civil aspirants…….
amit shale teri bahan aur maa ko main kharid loonga bol bechta hai kya
main dusra rajjeev v un per tumne mere nam se panga leker achha nahi kiya Amitwa
मेरे आसपास 25 -30 लोग हैँ जिनकी बुकलेट 108+ दर्शा रही है,परन्तु BPSC
ने 96 ,98 ,93 दे के बाहर कर दिया,इनका गुनाह
बस यही है कि इन्होने सही उत्तर दिया।
कास ये ब्यवस्था बदले,
हँसो मे जो कौवे हैँ
वो बाहर होँ ,वो मै रहूँ या
आप।
this is unfortunate. they can contact directly to BPSC if any counting error is there? But in my opinion it is not possible as evaluation are now done by computers. Vijay ji some students are always faking and pointing correct answer in booklet after exam with cosulatation with other ansipirant to prove themself intelligent. So don’t believe in them. Beware of those people. Consentrate on Mains.
WELL SAID rajeev ranjan,I APPERICIATE YOUR VIEW.THESE PEOPLE ARE LIKE STONES. IF THEY ARE CAPABLE THEN WHY THEY HAVE NOT SELECTED .IS 15000 IS NOT ENOUGH THEY HAVE TO REQUIRED ATLEAST 150000 SELECTION THAN THEY WILL SATISFY. EXAM IS THE MIND GAME AND IF SOMEONE HAS FAILURE THAN IT IS HIS OWN FAILURE BPSC/UPSC OR ANY OTHER CAN,T WROTE. THEY ARE DANGEROUS FOR HIMSELF AND ALL WHO HAVE QUALIFIED.INME TO 7000 AISE THE JINHONE APNA ROLL NO. HI GALAT LIKHA THA WAISE BANDE BHI ABHI STRUGGLE KAR RAHE HONGE KI YA TO EXAM CANCEL HO JAYE YA SELECTION 0 PE HO JAYE. MAIN PUCHNA CHAHTA HUIN KI 8 QUESTION JO HATAYE GAYE WO SABKE LIYE THA KI JO QUALIFY NAHI KAR PAYE UNKE LIYE THA. 8 QUESTION JO HATAYA GAYA USME SE 7 SOLUTION JO NET PE DIYA GAYA THA DIFFERENT SITES PE MERA SAHI THA. KYA HUA MUGHE TO GILA SIKWA NAHI HAI. AGAR KISI KI HAAR HO GAYI HAI TO KABUL KARNA CHAHIYE NA KI EMPIRE KO DOSH DENA CHAHIYE CHAHE WO HAAR 1 MARKS SE HO YA 25 MARKS SE.
हँसो मे जो कौवे हैँ
YAHAN NA KOI HANSH HAI NA KAUA. WE ALL ARE STUGGLING FOR OUR BETTER CAREER RAJEEV JI.
@ RAJEEV RANJAN & VK SINGH
dear i have nothing to do wid BPSC/UPSC. I have my well established business..but i have dragged in to dis debate just for d sake of my friend Mr. Ravi jaiswal. I don know Why u people r worried about d court judgement & doing bullshit talk. We have d very right to get justice if something has gone wrong. & infact we should fight every kind of corruption together just take a example of ANNA HAZARE. Aur rahi baat 15000 result me selection nahi hona den here i must say for ur kind info dat my friend RAVI has been appearing in UPSC (IAS) for last TWO times. So he must be in better position than what u people r. therefore ur argument doesn’t seem relevent. So i appeal to all of u to either support d cause to get justice for them or if u cant den atleast pls don tossed ur bullshit words up in d sky bcoz it will again fall down in to ur mouth.
Thanx
sorry here again passing comment to VK SING & RAJEEV RANJAN bcoz in above mentioned post i missed one word i.e actually i wanted to write dat my friend RAVI has been appearing in UPSC(IAS) INTERVIEW for last two times. & he must b in better position dan what u guys are.
@ RAJEEV RANJAN & VK SINGH
kya aap ye bata sakate hai bpsc in every exam done mistake donot a serious matter because u r selected ,if again bpsc done main exam or interview then no problem for you but it is a problem friend understand only V K SINGH argument just a irresponsible citizen of india which say like a 5 yr old child .anyone has right to go for justice ,i think u must see patna highcourt judgement of judiciary pt exam bpsc ,it means highcourt or VK SINGH WRONG ,I request to you first fight against corruption nahi to pata chala ki mains me bpsc bahar kar diya tab tumhe khujli hoga otherwise sudharoge nahi ,group b officer ho i m also a ongc executive engineer
madarchod rajeev, …………bhosardichod behen ke lorde, …..gand faad dunga sale, aukat me rah…….saale ghar me ghush kar maarunga, koi bachane nahi aayega,,,,,,,,,
I appreciate energy of al lperson out here….share me de high court case no….even i m going to file one for scaling.share me n we will fight together…..sare funde yahin mat jharo dost VK singh jaise log hamesha honge jinki zindagi yahin khatam hoti hai…b grade central servise n prelims ka result…but u r no different…READ MY ^ DAYS BACK POST…
Life has always been like this drawing boundary with robing our utmost vitality called blood. there will be always few on either side of this not certainly because of potentiality of capability difference but because of the fact that this is the cruel and amusing facets of life. You call it luck or randomness…But dark humor is that it exists… absorb it, try to walk along with it or fight it… Anubhuti probably found tough to give serious soul to some of the options.. probably he has seen the sudden probable future of your hue and cry… Probably he is addressing to large portion (99)of crowd who shout from his roof top about certain injustice in morning and use well placed platform (without even acknowledging let alone thanking) and sleep tight in night..In search of finding partner who have got fucked with same cause as of him and find solace sharing mutual grief… Boundary drawn long back..some 8 days…He missed a class called warrior, i wont blame him even he waited for 7 days… warrior dont wait, he don try to find partner to shout with him neither he want people to console him in his grief…warrior walk alone…He arrange, revenge, act, regret then announce…I am yet to find one…..
beautifully written……….kudos to ur strength of expression kunal
mr GAUTAM KUNAL teri aukat kuch nahi hai . u r like dust bin tere jaise bahut dekhe hain humne tum amit etc r like the roadchaap.
MOHAN CHUTIYA TO TUM HO GANDI NAALI KE KIDE.VK SINGH IS RIGHT. I APPERICIATE HIM HE IS AGAINST THE BAD CULTURES THAT U ALL ARE CREATING. PAHLE MEHANT KARO MOHAN CHUTIA.
BPSC ke result me 7000 mein 3000 fixed tha, only 4000 has got 104, rest is paid or yahi har category mein hua hai……….this is true or ye har saal hota hai…….i hv also suffrd due to corruption and mismanagement of BPSC, I was silent as i did nt give importance…..busy in research…….but we must nt tolerate this. Agar BPSC itna hi sahi hai to har baar question kyun galat set karta hai…..ek constitutional examination body 150 question sahi set nahi karsakta to use 100 hi karde……..its ridiculous, iska karan sirf student ko gumrah karna hai…….isme govt to officials sab involved hain…….
congratulations to all selected one…i m nothng against them……bt dnt wry guys u can feel this discrimination at next stage…..be aware guys.
BPSC ke result me 7000 mein 3000 fixed tha, only 4000 has got 104, rest is paid or yahi har category mein hua hai……….this is true or ye har saal hota hai…….i hv also suffrd due to corruption and mismanagement of BPSC, I was silent as i did nt give importance…..busy in research…….but we must nt tolerate this. I kw my efficiency well, there were 100 genuine questions in exam…nd above that all were just gud guess work, in that case 104 is very high score….. Agar BPSC itna hi sahi hai to har baar question kyun galat set karta hai…..ek constitutional examination body 150 question sahi set nahi karsakta to use 100 hi karde……..its ridiculous, iska karan sirf student ko gumrah karna hai…….isme govt to officials sab involved hain…….
congratulations to all selected one…i m nothng against them……bt dnt wry guys u can feel this discrimination at next stage…..be aware guys.
DEAR GAUTAM KUNAL PLEASE BE POLITE I CAN USE SAME LANGUAGE AS U HAVE SAID AGAINST ME. BUT I M NOT LK U. I DONT KNOW U AND YR COMMENT AGAINST ME REVEALS YR CULTURE. THIS IS NOT THE BATTLE FIELD. GIVE YR VIEW IN POSITIVE MANNER NOT AGAINST ANY PERSON U HAVE WRITTEN PERSONAL COMMENT AGAINST ME.
DEAR AMIT YR VIEW AGAINST corruption IS RIGHT AND I M SUPPORTING IT. I M NOT IN FAVR OF CORRUPTION BUT THIS IS NOT THE MATTER OF CORRUPTION U ALSO REALIZE IT. YE PURA SYSTEM HI WAISA HI HAI KYA LAGTA HAI KI COURT ME SABHI DUDH KE DHULE HUE HAIN. AISA NAHI HAI. ISH DESH KA DURBHAGYA HAI KI CORRUPTION ROKNE KE LIYE ORGNIZATION BANA HAI WAHI SABSE JYADA CORRUPT HAI.SAMASYA BAHUT HAI AUR JIS SANSTHA PE HAME VISWAS HAI USKE BARE ME HUM SAB BEHTAR JANTE HAIN.MAAN LIYA JAYE KI EXAM. CANCEL HO JATA HAI YA CUTOFF 8 MARKS KAM KIYA JATA HAI TO MAINS ME KAM SE KAM 50000 STUDENTS APPEAR HONGE IS IT IS POSSIBLE. KYA SOLUTION HAI. JAHAN TAK 8 QUESTION GALAT HONE KA SAWAL HAI TO JO Q. IS GALAT HAI USKA KOI SAHI ANSWER KAISE DE SAKTA HAI . YE SARMANAK HAI KI BPSC 150 RIGHT QUESTION BHI NAHI SET KAR SAKTA HAI. AUR JO COMMENT MERE AGAINST MAHAN LOGO KE DWARA AAYA HAI KYA WO SAHI HAI. MAIN BHI USHE KATHOR LANGUAGE ME COMMENT LIKH SAKTA HUIN. LEKIN YE HAL NAHI HAI.YAHAN AUKAT KA SAWAL NAHI HAI YAHAN SAWAL HAI SAHI GALAT KA.
who the hell you are V K singh.. …THIS TYPE OF COMMENT AMIT BHAI TUMHARE DWARA SHOBA NAHI DETA HAI. GAUTAM KUNAL JAISE LOGO KE LIYE COMMENT LIKHNA BHI MAIN JARURI SAMAGHTA HUIN. WO KYA HAI USKE LANGUAGE SE HI PATA CHALTA HAI.
stop stop stop is blog ko palasi ka maidan mat banao. Is desh main sabhi ko apni baat kahne aur apne haq ke liye ladne ka freedom hai.pl aaplog baap aur aukat ki baat na kare.lagta hi nahi ye blog padhe likhe loga ka hai.
Just file RTI and ask for photocopy of answer sheet and after getting same you can confirm your answer and it will be an evidence for your claim and BPSC will bound to give your right.use RTI against BPSC.
@Amit Ji, you are an executive engineer, but it not reflect from your comments. Keep patience, you will be selected next year. @ Pramod JI you think your friend is better than all us. Are you in any illusion or in a dream? Do you know me. If you don’t then not comment like this. Who told you that a person appeared in interview of UPSC is the best in the world? If you have an established business then ‘Do your own business’.
RAJEEV RANJAN BILKUL SAHI KAHA AAPNE.
Anubhuti sir will u plz tell me any expected date of mains..
rajeev and vk singh ,i read comment given by AMIT ,that comment is very very bad language use, not repeat here because i donot like this type of comment ,I M OTHER AMIT dost wo JUST NAME SAME ,so donot comment this type
frnds request
anubhuti sir bpsc mains kab hoga? please reply
MAA BAHAN KE DALALI KHANE WALO BESHARMO YAHAN PE SIRF BPSC KE UPAR HI COMMENT HOTA HAI HARAMI K AULAD
Somebody had commented with my name, please do not use other’s name and disclose identity. I am inspector in department of post, selected through SSC graduate level exam. please someone send me previous year question paper of History, LSW and GS @ rajranjan1979@gmail.com I work in Kerala here nothing is avaialable. Last time I missed mains due to inordinate delays caused by court cases. Earlier I had gone Patna to appear in mains, but the exam was postponed and when it was really happened< I though it will be again postponed. For the Amit who commented against me. I will tell only one thing please disclose your identity. You are telling that you are earning more than me. But your kind information I want to tell you that I have now ten year service in the government. I was earlier Section Controller in Railways and Goods Guard in Railways. Even I will be selected my salary will be less what I draw now.
promod kamine tum buisiness karte ho apni bala se sabji bechte ho ki dudh . Buisiness to chay wala bhi karti hai.tumhara dost ias ka interview de diya to bahut bada tope ho gaya kya bpsc me aukat pata chal gaya na. Agar chay bechte ho to mughe bhi pilana aur main jo chore duin use bhi pi jana . Teri aukat chay bechnewale jaisi hai.i m great means gautam great samgha promod beta.
Above comment was not mine..I dont know who is doing this…Use if you have guts to say some tough words say it with your own identity….dusro ka naam use karna its very cheap hathkhanda…..shame man whosever done this…
Anubhuti, You should certainly find mechanism to curb this malafide practise..Something like making registration mandatory on this blog…Alternatively publish the mail id instead of name.
any information about mains exam…when it is?
mains octubr ds se hog
mains exam 10 octbr se hone ki smbhavana hai
EXAM. 8 OCTOBER SE HONE KA UMEED HAI.
vk singhji kya date extend ki koi poosibility hai?maine bhi 8oc to 22 oct hi suna hai.
We have to assume its 8th Oct and prepare for exams accordingly
date extend ho sakta hai agar case ho jaye.
case ho gaya sir..
Exam will be in Dec first week to 3rd week
rajivji ,singhji and others mains dene wale aspirants mains ke date or court case ke bare main aapke paas koi bhi news ho to blog ko please updodate karte rahe,.bpsc office ke paas do dino se ladko ka hungama jaari hai.aaryan and kashish news channel ne bhi ladko ka saath diya hai.
chutiyen hai jo hungama kar rahe hain. They are ugly nachania vulgar .in chutYON ke rahte kuch nahi ho sakta kamine hain saale GANDI NALI KE KIDE.
bade badai na kare bade na bole bol rahiman hera kab kahe lakh taka more mol..parde ke peche se bolna easy hai samne thoda problem so we are support truth ..success batai nahi jati dekh jata hai ..
bpsc pe case ho gaya 50to60 candiate ne 6august ko writ submitt kar diya hai..
writ petition has been filed in the hon”ble high court ,patna on saturday.refer hindustan dainik dated 7th august patna edition.
bpsc pt exam ke result par patna high court me yachika dayar kaar dee gayi hai.abhay has given the right information. thanks
Good news! for all desperate candidate that PIL is filed against BPSC(PT-Result) in high court. I want to give grand salute for those 54 candidate who take such brave action for fight justice. Now i think high court will follow his path & must take decision in favour of candidate.
writ petition has been filed against bpsc pt result.
please refer hindustan danik, patna edition…
it is indeed a good news.at least someone hsa stood up against the injustice .
I think some more result will be anounced, and cut off will be 101 for GEN
how can u say that? what is your source of information?
because maximum 5 % question can be deleted , this is a general rule for conducting any examination. Hence 5 question may be permitted by Honourable High court and cut off will be down by 3 marks for all category
5 % may be read as 3%
There were 150 questions, hence 5 percent means 7.5 questions. So how can 3 marks will be lowered?
it is very bad news for main exam bpsc candidate ,exam too much delay even march 2012 is not sufficient due to a large no. of petition file against pt exam so dear frnd it is just like 48-52 bpsc story repeat so HALLAAAAAAA BOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL against bpsc bpsc
just bpsc ke chairman ne sare media wale ko bulaya hai. Whats the cause i do’t knw. Possible hai ki 26/27 sep. Se mains ho.
mains exam set to be delayed by 4 months .court hearings would decide the date.
DHANANJAY KUMAR (PATNA) ne mujhe
aaj suchna d ki BPSC revised result
dane ki soch
raha hai
aise me kuch
log jo pt pas hain bahar
ho sakte hain. kya kisi
ko news hai?
this is true.
@ dhananjay, how can u say that?
Kindly suggest hindi medium books for Anthropology.
court main hearing ka date kab hai
@ALOK ji….media se chairman ne keya bola hai…
keya pillay saheb retirement se pehle mains le lenge…
Hi guys, I am working with Patna High Court obtained 101 marks in PT. Last time time in the judicial services examination the commission was told to reduce there cut off marks in proportion to deleted questions and give a fresh result. the matter is in Hon’ble Supreme Court. Till 6th, no writ petition has been filed in the HC.
aaj ke paper main to aisa kuch nahi hai ki unhone media se kya baat ki. Court hi mains ke exam ko extend kar sakta hai. Revised result dena hota to mains ke forms ka date bpse nahi nikalta .8ot or 26 sep se mains exam hone ki puri possibility hai.working aspirants ke liye xe date danger hai
Today there is a hearing in supreme court on judiciary. Its decision will effect 52-55exam. We have filed case against BPSC on not only wrong answers in rest of 142 questions but alos on deleted questions (from 46th to 55 exam) and other irregularities. PIL will come soon before the honorable Judges. Mains form doesn’t effect matter because obviously BPSC will continue its process. We are not worried about process because in judiciary too, commission has issued application after result. But after Patna high court judgement matter is still pending.
bpsc loose case in supreme court.
great news. Hon’ble Supreme Court has rejected SLP of BPSC. It means in judicial services examination either they have to give additional result or cancel the exam altogether. the same will be applied in Bpsc pre also.
answer sheet under RTI.great relief for students.it will create a sort of check on the malpractices in evaluation.
bpsc ka revised result phir kab ayega………….plz give me information.
no any order is given by supreme court on 27th judicial exam on 9th august..you can see supreme court case no-SLP (Civil) 19592-19654 / 2011
CASE IS NOT UPDATED BECAUSE THERE IS NO HEARING DETAILS AND THERE IS NO FURTHER LISTING DETAILS. BPSC CASE IS DISMISSED. I TALKED TO JUDICIAL PETITIONERS AND THEY CONFIRMED THE NEWS.
exam aspirants, whether selected in PT or not keep your study constantly and beware of false speculations. This is not the last chance and civil service is a mission not only an exam only as shown by some of our friends. So keep reading.
BHOSHRIWALON PIL KARNE WALON SAALON KOI KAM DANDHA NAHI HAI SUAR KAMINO
उत्तर पुस्तिकायेँ
दिखाने के आदेश ने
छात्रोँ के हाथ मे ब्रह्मास्त्र
दे दिया है,
अतः जिन्हेँ जरुरी लगे
प्रयोग करेँ,
चाहे BPSC,JPSC,
RPSC या कोई भी
PSC हो।
supreme court has dismised the petition of bpsc in 27th judicial exam…you can see the case no -SLP (Civil) 19592-19654 / 2011..students got victory…………..
BPSC DOESN’T HAVE ANY OPTION BUT TO DECLARE THE RESULT. AFTER JUDICIARY BPSC HAVE TO FOLLOW THE SAME RULE IN 53-55 EXAM. THERE IS NO OPTION LEFT WITH BPSC. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT BPSC WILL NOT DECLARE RESULT ON ITS OWN (IN 53-55 EXAM). BUT IN PATNA HIGH COURT WHERE PIL IS FILED, IT HASN’T ANY DEFENSE. HOWEVER THERE WAS MEETING IN BPSC REGARDING THAT JUDGMENT, AND ACCORDING TO UNCONFIRMED SOURCES BPSC IS CONTEMPLATING TO DECLARE THE EXTRA RESULT.
CAN ANY ONE EXPLAIN ME HOW DOES IT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IF BPSC CONSIDER ONLY 142 QUESTIONS FOR EVERY CANDIDATE’S MARK SHEET.
BPSC को छात्रोँ के मौलिक
अधिकारोँ का हनन नही
करना चाहिए।
उसे 98 कट आफ़ मानकर
EXTRA RESULT देना
चाहिए।
MR VIJAY IS IT PROPER TO ALLOW MORE THAN 25000 STUDENT TO APPEAR IN MAINS FOR ABOUT 700 VACANCIES.
भूल सुधार
कट आफ 98 की जगह
96 पढेँ.।
anyone has news abt mains date, plz share
Patna High court questioned BPSC regarding PT results .Next hearing on 16th Aug.check today’s Dainik Hindustan (Page no 9).
http://epaper.livehindustan.com/Publications/HT/HP/2011/08/13/INDEX.SHTML
thanks raman
BPSC REPLIED THAT HE WILL ADD 8 MARKS TO ALL CANDIDATES INCLUDING SUCCESSFUL THEN STUDENTS LAYER SAID THAT THERE ARE 15 MISTAKES IN QUESTIONS. JUDGES FIXED 6 SEPTEMBER FOR NEXT HEARING.
Now it does’t seem that anything will happen in unsuccessful candidates favour. So successful guys keep preparing for mains. BPSC is different commision in India. Its result always creates surprises. And this year was also not exception. Hardly anything is going to happen on 6 septemebr, BPSC will say on that date that it has prepared everything for mains so nothing is possible.
completely misjudging the process.hon”ble patna high court has stayed the conduct of mains till the court proceedings come to a final conclusion.
have a any news for Bpsc today highccourt hearing , kya extra result Bpsc degi
Mains will be in DEC
@Rajeev ! What is the source of your information?
bpsc ne high court ko kaha hai ki jab tak court se faisla nahi aata hai mains ka exam conduct nahi hoga . Dainik jagran 17/08
Thanks Alok jee news update kaney ke liey.
is there any news from BPSC sources?
no extra result will be published
false news. bpsc will be bound to publish extra result by the order of court. There is no other option. if it will not publish then it will be contempt of court.
EXTRA RESULT WILL BE PUBLISHED.
judicary ka result pe bpsc ka kya openion hai jo hoga .52-55 bpsc ka bhi same process hoga may be..
judiciary extra result ayega, and also in 52-55 mei bhi court kuch extra result dene ka adesh dega. Aisa isliye kyoki judge ne spast bpsc ke wakil ko kaha ki apke jabab se santust nahi hain isliye koi rasta nikaliye. Aur rasta obvious hain ki some extra result. 8 cutoff kam karna muskil hain par bpsc ke pas koi option nahi hain.
thanks brother for imformation..
is there any basis of your information or just speculation?
my marks is 102 , kya Bpsc extra result degi , kya mujhe mains likhne ka moka milega , I m depress. Plz give information some one
depress mat ho dost mera no 103 hai roll 138222,i am also disqulified manzile aur bhi hai .umeed hai mains likhne ka mauka mile ..abhi tak to case favour me dekh raha hai..
extra result must declare or exam cancel ,reexam hard task for bpsc so no other option for bpsc so donot worry friends ,doing job for main exam
yes bpsc some result add karega 6septembrr ke bad combind result .but not confirm kitne marks add karega..but chance hai 3000 result dega…
can you say the sources or only speculation?
thanks a lot santosh Ji…….
JPSC RELEASES PT RESULT
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/08/jpsc-release-4th-pt-result.html
jpsc website is not opening any idea about the cutoff for sociology
anyone who have access to the result pls check my result….my roll no. is 333053422. I from based in delhi and no contacts in ranchi…thank you
jpsc pt result-101000352 124009019 150019564 206030634 314043063 410059979 519079114 617091215 102000424 124009121 151019807 206030683 315043273 413061500 521079842 618091606 102000520 125009320 151019841 206030814 315043356 414062209 521079856 618091609 103001000 125009493 151019852 206030850 315043365 414062244 529083306 618091680 103001170 126009890 151019893 207031080 316043822 416063144 601083804 618091783 104001262 126010027 152020509 207031086 316043870 416063190 603084759 619091883 104001355 126010079 152020680 207031101 318044551 417063782 603085039 619091896 105001687 127010542 154021395 207031120 319044918 418064006 603085225 620092576 105001924 127010610 155022027 208031678 320045490 419064280 603085229 621092779 105001981 127010660 155022102 209032442 320045495 419064381 604085528 621093168 106002245 130011550 157022572 209032447 321045994 419064777 605085610 621093305 106002266 130011588 157022668 209032522 321046015 420064822 605085700 621093335 106002436 131012072 157022682 209032543 321046281 420064845 606086144 622093595 107002540 132012278 158023534 209032557 322046398 421065326 606086201 623093711 107002622 132012482 159023793 209032613 323046726 422065575 606086255 623093791 108002997 132012519 161024358 210033048 324047836 422065595 607087188 623093806 108003052 133012785 162024733 210033093 325048066 422065618 608087426 623093836 108003059 133012824 162024757 210033197 326049058 423065901 609087878 623093887 110003822 133012846 163025238 211033441 326049073 423065920 610088012 623094143 111004009 133013015 164025650 212034230 327049487 423065923 610088065 624094312 111004267 134013338 164025694 213034755 327049557 423065931 610088506 624094377 112004454 135013529 165026050 213034799 327049570 424066245 610088536 624094661 112004461 135013665 165026154 216036704 329050536 424066272 612089056 701095833 112004646 136014120 166026387 217036899 330051176 425066523 612089068 702096000 113004903 139015062 166026461 217037045 330051217 429068581 612089148 702096031 114005281 140015438 166026643 217037158 330051298 435070698 612089223 702096150 114005317 140015544 167026933 301037229 331051440 437071425 612089231 703096309 114005333 141015808 167027083 301037344 333052971 439072127 613089496 704096739 116005854 142016220 201027210 303038331 333053023 440072558 614089982 704096840 116005935 142016320 202027921 303038426 334053473 440072586 614090137 704096879 117006367 143016685 202028004 304038749 334053487 440072853 614090181 704096885 117006415 143016760 202028017 306039696 334101547 441072986 615090381 706097396 119006977 143016779 202028033 306039697 334101549 442073307 615090396 707097774 119006988 144017151 203028848 307040109 335054760 442073361 615090463 707097784 120007337 145017724 203028874 308040553 402055871 501073842 616090682 707097845 122008026 146017986 203028882 308040573 404056566 501073976 616090786 707097886 123008260 146018002 203028933 309040923 405057162 502074157 616090828 708098247 123008355 147018480 204029527 309041005 406057386 507075690 616090832 708098284 123008557 148018713 204029587 312042215 406057400 513077269 616090970 708098366 124008794 149019209 206030632 313042598 407057932 515077909 617091113 708098377 709098477 717100953 709098528 718101072 710099329 718101368 711099437 162024802 711099445 428067676 711099639 605085706 711099712 703096461 712100044 207031239 714100339 213034638 714100417 717100937 715100494 603084691 715100565 610088554 उं3ीॠश्र18 : इउ-कक फश्र ठश्र. 103000944 156022516 302037829 430068907 612089055 623093756 103001020 160024052 303038261 433069637 612089073 623093881 105001806 167026791 303038696 434070476 613089467 624094336 106002402 202028209 305039525 437071483 613089564 624094431 108003173 202028267 307040169 440072928 613089613 624094437 116005910 202028542 310041391 441072993 613089658 625094824 117006290 202028738 324047801 442073312 614090130 625094827 119006918 203029440 326049178 504074888 614090134 701095845 120007213 205030133 328050088 505075106 615090321 702096045 120007451 205030208 332052344 518078807 615090325 703096317 124008782 205030217 334053874 519079001 616090787 703096621 124008931 205030403 334101504 519079316 617091063 705096964 129011418 206030646 334101531 521079848 617091067 708098333 132012431 208031835 335054630 524080697 617091072 710098955 133012739 210033119 403056327 524080713 618091531 710099218 133012754 210033160 412061086 601083905 618091796 711099390 136013925 211033422 415062616 602084270 619091839 711099439 140015722 211033628 416063209 602084297 619091922 713100257 144017311 213034873 417063770 603084692 619092054 716100703 146018001 213034897 419064271 603085282 620092439 716100706 150019466 214035396 419064319 606086153 620092524 717100828 153021233 215036447 424066231 607087127 621092666 718101337 155021808 217037070 426066838 607087174 621092887 718101410 155021858 217037082 427067162 610088157 622093468 432069230 155021967 217037159 429068490 610088566 622093516 441073238 उं3ीॠश्र18 : रउ फश्र ठश्र. 101000152 149019323 321046082 434070308 610088133 625095402 102000689 151019868 321046162 439072060 610088278 702096194 103001004 154021534 323046894 440072643 612089239 703096326 104001352 155021882 324047849 503074525 613089668 703096421 109003396 157022556 328050087 503074580 614090070 704096849 112004479 162024643 332052326 503074596 614090227 704096876 114005242 164025681 332052716 507075701 614090234 705096972 117006388 164025751 333053002 507075717 615090453 705097291 117006493 165026123 402055834 512077173 615090582 705097307 120007440 166026736 402055854 513077333 616090673 706097336 124009021 203029045 407057929 519078925 616090784 706097468 125009522 204029565 407057933 521079858 617091014 706097483 127010351 204029611 409059275 527081764 618091802 706097612 128010857 204029734 409059387 528082083 619092122 707097781 129011214 206030673 410059960 528082632 619092279 707097791 130011749 207031046 411060442 601083962 620092599 707097885 130011806 208031654 411061003 601083974 621093357 707098101 133012861 208032163 412061080 601084016 621093372 707098131 136013840 210033115 412061092 602084368 623093841 709098426 136014166 211033642 424066209 605085711 623093876 709098568 140015671 215036545 424066259 605085922 623094101 709098585 142016381 215036594 428067691 606086467 623094139 710098958 142016579 217037041 432069327 606086711 624094546 711099434 145017574 304038798 432069332 609087697 625094830 711099506 147018544 311041867 433069986 610088061 625094902 711099543 711099857 717100777 713100102 718101075 713100141 718101125 713100150 213034721 715100598 709098594 उं3ीॠश्र18 : र8 फश्र ठश्र. 101000028 109003613 118006561 125009439 132012592 138014812 145017631 151019967 158023294 165026088 212034295 415062907 519079013 101000108 110003643 118006589 125009465 133012712 138014846 145017664 152020522 158023372 165026089 213034709 416063287 519079014 101000142 110003737 118006672 125009496 133012713 138014853 145017665 152020535 158023410 165026100 213034739 420064859 519079109 101000236 110003750 118006809 125009545 133012734 138014882 145017670 152020599 158023587 165026133 213034874 420065201 520079610 101000347 110003928 118006854 125009555 133012801 139015066 145017719 152020623 159023727 165026139 214035465 423066090 520079632 102000430 110003930 119006939 125009616 133012866 139015071 145017809 152020663 159023732 165026330 216036653 428067824 521079757 102000551 110003938 119006996 126009806 133012951 139015222 146017952 152020673 159023928 166026482 217036910 429068470 521079812 102000701 110003944 119007040 126009950 133012956 139015230 146017969 152020681 159023948 166026538 217037131 435070840 521079911 102000717 111004011 119007043 126010001 134013190 139015258 146017973 152020733 160024020 166026548 304038807 436071143 522080130 102000719 111004067 119007121 126010022 134013209 139015260 146018034 152020737 160024023 166026612 306039727 501073819 522080211 103000963 111004083 119007171 126010065 134013372 139015335 146018114 153020882 160024044 166026669 306039746 501073868 522080227 103001047 111004202 120007200 126010122 134013392 140015524 146018138 153020910 160024089 166026700 307040214 501073888 523080339 103001051 111004204 120007202 127010322 135013415 140015561 146018149 153020979 160024112 166026762 310041323 502074146 523080419 103001077 111004318 120007255 127010384 135013474 140015587 147018195 153021006 160024136 167026839 310041438 502074210 524080692 103001092 112004466 120007302 127010391 135013478 140015712 147018223 153021022 160024141 167026889 311041720 502074308 524080722 103001149 112004500 120007322 127010422 135013500 141015870 147018246 153021024 160024146 167026899 311042018 503074436 524080821 104001258 112004585 120007329 127010439 135013674 141015903 147018274 153021099 160024152 167026903 312042270 503074554 525081205 104001269 112004725 120007343 127010571 135013805 141015994 147018314 153021133 160024153 167026916 313042595 503074651 526081453 104001273 113004807 120007434 127010580 136013827 141016051 147018320 153021138 160024202 167026937 315043342 504074785 526081530 104001329 113004876 120007497 127010602 136013829 141016063 147018344 153021159 160024247 167026964 315043367 504074833 528082075 104001375 113004913 121007529 127010617 136013880 141016089 147018354 153021171 160024257 167026970 316043876 505075166 528082084 104001433 113004949 121007550 128010713 136013914 141016104 147018356 153021249 160024259 167026977 318044448 506075349 528082198 104001436 113005044 121007626 128010733 136013915 141016161 147018482 154021307 161024316 167026984 319044864 507075704 528082244 105001689 113005056 121007807 128010758 136013933 142016372 147018493 154021353 161024405 167027060 320045502 508075956 528082832 105001717 113005080 121007867 128010821 136013956 142016374 147018522 154021358 161024412 201027394 320045542 508076120 529083057 105001723 113005090 121007908 128010937 136013958 142016375 148018681 154021428 161024440 202028069 321046375 510076410 529083219 105001778 113005153 122007944 128010968 136013997 142016390 148018702 154021482 161024490 202028111 322046527 510076498 529083221 106002203 113005159 122007968 128010975 136014032 142016495 148018771 154021490 161024533 203028822 323046759 510076589 601083811 106002264 114005210 122007977 128010988 136014049 142016511 148018801 155021800 161024577 203029010 324047662 511076896 602084300 106002283 114005236 122008010 128011001 136014110 142016522 148018915 155021906 162024617 203029019 324047754 511076916 603084699 106002450 114005367 122008028 128011012 136014187 142016523 148018997 155021975 162024651 205030307 325048552 513077428 603085040 107002524 114005431 122008119 129011164 137014243 142016585 148019002 155021984 162024731 205030317 326049099 513077463 604085406 107002537 114005465 123008245 129011258 137014252 143016858 149019073 156022283 162024766 206030573 326049420 513077499 605085828 107002549 114005473 123008356 129011285 137014283 143016864 149019134 156022301 162024780 206030663 329050553 513077513 605086028 107002579 115005524 123008362 129011322 137014292 143016868 149019196 156022326 162024832 207030961 331051444 514077566 606086419 107002603 115005559 123008364 129011376 137014293 143016872 149019234 156022348 162024839 207031250 331051493 514077703 606086527 107002692 115005567 123008392 129011397 137014307 143016889 149019236 156022350 162024865 208031728 331051710 514077723 608087422 107002729 115005615 123008518 129011428 137014341 143016917 149019280 156022394 162024918 208031758 331051822 515077789 608087461 107002736 115005618 123008535 129011447 137014350 143016924 150019355 156022406 162024984 208031809 333053021 515077950 609087596 108002992 115005659 123008543 130011592 137014392 143017022 150019533 156022408 163025258 209032548 333053053 516078096 610088346 108003028 115005679 123008615 130011645 137014396 144017103 150019600 156022413 163025290 209032578 333053132 516078191 610088544 108003160 116005829 124008776 130011655 137014434 144017105 150019602 157022543 163025313 209032584 334053485 516078307 612089057 108003284 116005858 124008852 130011687 137014448 144017263 150019649 157022669 163025457 209032616 334053532 517078467 612089219 109003328 116005951 124008925 131011936 137014514 144017314 151019751 157022675 164025609 210033021 334054009 517078547 612089424 109003353 116006096 124009058 131011979 138014568 144017328 151019812 157022701 164025710 210033089 401055524 518078711 613089663 109003419 116006103 124009072 131012003 138014609 144017399 151019850 157022705 164025755 210033100 402056100 518078717 613089714 109003449 116006113 124009129 131012069 138014669 145017506 151019879 157022797 164025801 210033155 403056326 518078819 613089774 109003459 117006325 125009287 132012373 138014670 145017522 151019884 157022801 164025871 210033171 408058820 519078990 614089970 109003496 117006329 125009319 132012379 138014759 145017601 151019885 157022908 165025986 210033333 411060364 519078996 615090562 109003601 117006420 125009376 132012523 138014775 145017604 151019887 158023256 165026034 211033993 414062247 519079003 617091214 617091426 706097595 619092252 709098583 620092518 710099049 621092679 713100218 621092785 717100776 621093021 717100867 621093120 132012294 621093253 133012789 622093638 146017956 623094072 147018565 623094085 151019942 623094114 156022363 625094710 161024481 625095138 163025366 625095215 213034876 625095274 401055569 701095706 522080287 701095783 527081867 701095918 610088775 704096748 612089158 उं3ीॠश्र18 : ठफएरएफश्एऊ — फश्र ठश्र. 101000413 125009734 149019311 202028555 211033366 302037988 318044656 325048953 334053711 405057224 409059827 417063872 428068138 437071583 524080898 608087292 103001088 126009802 150019746 202028573 211033395 302038006 319044854 325048984 334053913 406057460 409059929 417063882 428068148 438071834 524080913 608087345 103001109 126009819 151020070 202028615 211033940 302038016 319045055 326049131 334053970 406057497 411060351 417063886 428068247 438071940 525080981 610088093 103001233 126010188 151020156 202028700 211033997 302038233 319045376 326049156 334053992 406057506 411060376 418064044 428068290 439072162 525081144 610088315 104001494 126010286 151020159 202028707 211034003 303038398 319045402 326049198 334054007 406057547 411060395 418064073 428068317 439072393 525081213 610088741 106002120 127010541 151020407 202028711 211034025 303038446 319045424 327049948 334054011 406057765 411060457 418064107 428068324 439072395 525081218 610088780 106002353 127010564 151020408 202028739 211034035 303038523 320045667 328050184 334054016 406057780 411060668 418064133 428068355 439072408 525081229 611088978 106002466 128010957 151020412 202028774 211034084 303038700 320045672 328050205 334054103 406057809 411060682 419064401 428068356 439072414 525081295 612089040 107002522 128010976 153020890 203029102 211034114 304038741 320045912 328050429 334054127 406057820 411060698 419064652 428068359 439072421 527081956 612089100 107002882 128011110 153020940 203029103 212034178 304038846 320045937 328050442 334054133 406057821 411060786 419064699 428068376 439072452 527081957 612089428 108002932 129011529 153021154 203029146 212034383 304038938 320045959 328050451 334054182 406057834 411060797 419064709 428068397 439072481 527081972 612089432 108002957 131012143 154021592 203029400 212034429 304039218 321046173 329050992 334054208 406057854 411060944 419064722 428068408 440072624 528082165 613089853 108003172 131012258 154021692 203029402 212034435 305039404 321046192 329050994 334054357 406057869 411060964 420064938 428068409 440072779 528082450 614090107 109003375 132012522 154021697 203029403 212034440 306039656 322046555 329050996 334054429 407057913 411060970 420065042 430068914 440072916 528082511 617091053 110003692 132012673 155021719 203029407 212034443 306039664 322046593 329051003 334054435 407058023 411060991 420065186 431069086 441073050 528082573 617091417 111004245 133012737 155021722 203029417 212034449 306039853 322046605 329051016 335054767 407058025 411060992 420065218 431069107 441073090 528082576 617091466 111004246 133012944 155022120 203029420 213034643 306039870 323046860 329051059 335054835 407058089 411061020 420065237 431069155 441073096 528082586 618091678 111004296 134013349 156022237 203029431 213034675 307040082 323046862 329051072 335054997 407058270 412061154 420065242 432069347 442073383 528082598 618091716 111004357 134013386 156022277 203029434 213034920 307040269 323046916 330051301 335055003 407058271 412061190 420065256 432069366 442073414 528082673 619092261 112004368 135013708 157022599 204029470 213034951 307040274 323047027 330051320 335055066 407058330 412061207 420065279 432069371 442073660 528082718 620092350 112004386 136013851 157022803 204029530 213035210 308040614 323047172 330051335 335055088 407058335 412061209 420065281 433069626 442073687 528082798 620092373 112004643 136014092 157023185 204029558 213035213 308040690 323047220 330051351 335055131 407058346 412061461 420065282 433069662 501073967 528082821 620092378 112004728 136014177 157023201 204029761 213035254 309040922 323047229 331051567 335055212 407058351 413061566 421065439 433069673 501074052 528082835 620092574 113004831 136014231 158023281 204030038 213035257 309040980 323047243 331051622 335055213 407058363 413061618 422065698 433069752 501074059 528082847 621093051 113005098 137014505 158023347 204030074 213035265 309041078 323047335 331051637 335055285 407058372 413061906 422065802 433069963 502074281 528082848 621093056 113005188 138014581 158023507 204030084 213035266 309041085 323047336 331051871 335055298 407058383 413061912 423065970 433069978 502074379 528082862 621093069 115005695 139015221 160023987 204030085 213035268 309041107 323047451 331051884 335055306 408058420 413061914 423066006 433069983 505075018 528082899 621093074 115005779 139015364 160024253 205030376 213035284 310041571 323047478 331051931 335055332 408058783 413061932 423066012 433069988 505075268 528082939 621093137 115005821 140015665 160024281 205030432 214035391 311041945 323047481 331051963 335055341 408058810 413061980 424066290 433070010 506075328 529083017 621093164 116006093 142016501 161024576 206030549 214035665 311041981 323047501 331051969 335055364 408058826 413061982 424066332 433070072 506075582 529083151 622093435 116006111 142016513 162024641 206030852 214035667 312042271 323047512 331052055 335055427 408058840 413062164 424066338 433070105 507075645 529083175 623093725 116006121 142016519 162024681 206030903 214035680 312042343 323047524 331052080 335055472 408058847 414062327 424066366 433070123 509076192 529083252 623094161 117006269 143017044 162024879 206030924 214035920 313042761 323047619 331052142 335055478 408058896 414062593 425066633 433070162 509076327 529083261 625094730 117006499 144017349 165026221 207030954 214035967 313042774 323047648 331052253 335055492 408059085 415062743 425066649 433070218 510076655 529083300 625095221 117006539 144017457 165026230 207031128 214035990 313042777 324047905 331052259 335055494 408059100 415062751 426066957 433070240 510076671 530083385 625095362 119006923 145017487 165026303 207031518 214036171 314043114 325048386 331052298 401055746 408059122 415062754 426066959 434070416 511076964 530083589 625095518 121007542 145017509 165026372 208031993 214036253 314043179 325048523 332052517 402055947 408059149 415062755 427067535 434070417 511076987 530083624 625095557 121007864 145017514 166026641 208032004 214036364 315043291 325048559 332052546 403056375 409059317 415062985 427067547 434070418 514077617 601083765 701095720 122007941 145017732 166026750 208032140 216036652 315043450 325048579 332052550 403056377 409059362 415062986 427067574 434070455 515077969 601083782 701095733 122007989 146017929 167027059 208032181 301037320 315043489 325048696 332052837 403056380 409059372 415063008 428067794 434070505 516078344 603085047 703096257 123008286 147018200 201027229 208032191 301037387 315043493 325048787 332052853 404056552 409059459 415063044 428067796 434070566 519079177 603085091 703096511 123008638 147018261 201027774 208032284 301037426 315043590 325048792 332052868 404056676 409059597 415063049 428067799 434070619 519079184 606086115 703096541 123008644 147018468 201027819 208032337 301037632 315043757 325048795 333052972 404056769 409059607 415063073 428067809 434070630 519079189 606086508 703096555 124008796 147018496 201027887 208032341 301037642 316043814 325048813 333053096 404056918 409059616 416063222 428067958 435070793 519079211 606086529 703096593 125009318 147018598 202028163 208032353 301037645 317044209 325048817 333053163 404056935 409059653 416063223 428068027 435070863 519079308 606086621 704096766 125009548 148018632 202028255 209032402 301037656 317044221 325048873 333053169 404056953 409059668 416063277 428068034 435071035 520079437 606086692 705096920 125009670 148018894 202028281 209032738 301037721 317044223 325048881 333053400 404057019 409059669 416063560 428068038 435071048 521080021 606086947 705097187 125009673 148019006 202028287 209032765 301037732 317044249 325048909 334053591 405057075 409059676 416063568 428068068 436071197 521080031 606086957 705097190 125009675 149019047 202028497 209032848 302037979 317044288 325048923 334053595 405057205 409059756 416063578 428068088 436071229 523080586 606087062 705097230 125009676 149019096 202028541 210033296 302037987 318044644 325048928 334053620 405057214 409059813 416063613 428068105 437071404 524080707 607087132 705097274 705097275 712099996 707097761 713100089 707097769 715100550 707098025 717100847 707098085 113005159 707098122 151019789 707098144 153021001 707098215 304039193 708098280 324047849 709098412 330051401 709098699 432069230 709098702 441073238 709098731 605085706 710098945 160024202 710098948 209032460 710099202 423066066 710099211 435070824 710099245 439072186 710099298 502074185 711099372 611089013 711099375 621092666 711099378 163025156 711099705 301037694 711099709 434070
i have not to roll no. then how can i search roll number please help me other criteria
Prem kumar Singh
S/o- Hari Shankar Singh
D.O.B.-10-03-1986
vill- Brahampura
kya bpsc men aur result dega kya .please tell me as i live in orissa which is completely isolated and i has missed pt by only 1 marks
mai bhi anna!!
we wont tolerate corruption we will go to court if jpsc declared more result.
Come on yaar, it is you who despite failing in bpsc prelims, suggesting someone to go to court, but not going yourself, and now it seems u have passed, now saying that if more result declared you will to court. You are not going anywhere. Because person like u only bark but not bite. Why are u demanding more results from BPSC where 15000 results is declared? It is more than 10 times of seats. In your views in JPSC more than 10 times will attract corruption but not in Bihar where 10 percent of appearance is declared successful. It shows your true face mr. ASHU.
very good comment ankit
Mr ankit , ashu is a vr common name. thr r many person with this name. do u think that a person who can qualify in 850 will fail in 7767. apply ur mind. I m already in bpsc.instead of doing all this rubbish on net. u shud concentrate on ur studies otherwise next year also u will be on d same boat . so crux stop waistg ur time n others.
Any info abt bpsc pt additional result?
Kya extra result aayega
no chance
yes, it will come, bpsc is going to declare the result of judiciary in a few days, same will be implemented in 53-55 exam without doubt.
what is the date for next date before honble court?
what is the next date for hearing before honble court?
53-55 exam me no chance
Akashji maayush mat ho bahut jald 53-55 exam ka bhi extra result aayega
it is 2000% chance that 53-55 mein extra result ana hi hain. If you know any law then BPSC has no other option Mr. Akash. Either it has to cancel the exam or publish the extra result. It is supreme court decision which will apply without hesitation on 53-55 exam. Two law can not be followed in same matter. So wait for 6 September.
If any have idea about the probable date of mains exam please post comment
MAINS WILL BE AFTER UPSC MAINS
Likely in December. If judgment comes in September. Let’s hope for the best!
What is bpsc,Why does bpsc conduct so prestigious exam if it has no idea about setting 150 objective type questions.i think the responsibility of conducting at least pt should hand over to some central agencies like UPSC,SSC etc.My friends i m not criticizing the bpsc but i m arising question about its skills of setting question & conducting various exams.You see in 53-55 pre ,many questions have been repeated many questions have been taken from jpsc pre and so many questions were wrongs.It seems bpsc always want to play with the bright future of innocent students.My friends ,there is some people not bpsc behind this misdeed and those should be penalised severely so that no such incident should repeat in near future……..and our Honorable high court should should take stern steps regarding this………………my friends u must comment upon my view that will WELCOME.
Mr Das , UPSC never declares its answer sheet, mark sheet and cut off marks. If you match civil service PT answer from different sources you will discover that there is ambiguity over 5-10 questions. And there are chances that if upsc put answer sheet on its website many may discover few answers wrong and shout over it.
We must BE GRATEFUL to BPSC for being TRANSPARENT. BPSC accepted its mistake and did not consider those questions for preparing mark sheet.
CAN ANY ONE EXPLAIN ME HOW DOES IT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IF BPSC CONSIDER ONLY 142 QUESTIONS FOR EVERY CANDIDATE’S MARK SHEET.
NO one is/will/can shout over JPSC,UPSC or many other State Pub. Ser. Com. over issues like (a) wrong answers (b) wrong copy checking (c) wrong questions because they never declares (a) mark sheet (b)answer sheet or(c) cut off marks.
BPSC took 15000(+) students where it should take only 10000(-) ward off injustice done(by mistake) to any candidate .
we must be thankful for transparency of BPSC not hateful for mistakes that it had committed, accepted, corrected and compensated (by taking 5000 extra students) .
I am not saying that, go to the patna high court judgement on judiciary you will find the answer. Please don’t compare BPSC with UPSC. Never in the history doubts were raised on UPSC questions. Two year back when upsc find something wrong with its pub ad. question paper it ordered reexamination of that paper. Took the example of uttar pradesh public service commission which before publishing the result, publishes answer sheet and demands suggestions. After suggestions uppsc revised its result this year. And as far as 15000 is concerned, it is rule of bpsc that it will publish 10 percent of appearance. But its rule book also said it will evaluate on 150 marks not on 142 marks. On this basis supreme court has ordered jammu kashmir public service commission to give pro-rata basis marks to unsuccessful candidates. And also can commission answer that India has won only one team medal in commonwealth games? please visit the commonwealth and ministry of sports sites you will find the answer. And do you know kerala has also implemented 50 percent reservation for women in 2009? So what to those students who passed on these two wrong answers and what to those students who failed due to two marks? And last but not least, are you saying that if someone say that he has done something wrong, but since he has said it publicaly, he should be held responsible for anything wrong? If this is the case then each criminal committing crimes will say that since he has confessed its guilty, criminal charges should not be initiated against him? Ridiculous argument.
Ridiculous! Though I am selected. Even for UPSC mains, but I differ with you in totality. A commission does not know what is Rolling Plan? Sources of commercial energy? and many more . Hard to believe. It only does what it’s so called experts believe then my friend you also believe the corporate policy that boss is always right. Come on Bihar should change for good. Mistake year after year and exam after exam becomes grave mistake.
Mr suman i request u to plz check the answers which bpsc gave in answer sheet. 5 answers r wrong, except 8 question which bpsc deleted. give me ur email id. i ll send u authentic answer. if bpsc is monument of transprancy then bpsc ve 2 accept its blunder. earth2skys@yahoo.com
bihar sachivavaya shahayak ke bare koi idea ho to plz share karen
Dear Mr. Ankit now the PT exam is over. So please concentrate only on mains. Both the questions under suspiscion my answer became wrong. But I have been selected. Mere doubting over the BPSC does not yeild any fruitful result. If someone think that he has more knowledge than selected one, he should prove it in 142 question.
Come on yaar! Ek begunaah ko saja dena sabse bara gunaah hota hai. Be sporty! Tum to ek seat hi loge na. Your colleague should also be of your calibre. Mistake is mistake. As civil servant do not be submissive. Be transparent and honest. Give objective view.
mr rajeev ranjan kind for information that bpsc given 5 wrong answer, except deleting 8 question. so total question is 13. thats a ground of my writ.
bpsc always used to show student’s fault in diff. exams by saying that it publishes instructions in Question papers! it is evident in diff. court cases,..but has anyone read in it that he has to qualify on 142 or 136 marks instead of 150? why should we suffer again and again?
my dear swetank suman ,in last bpsc pt, no of successful candidates were19000 for 368 seats.This year 500 seats so…….as i know there r 4 correct qsns out of 8 deleted qsns.now lets take a case study regarding those qsns which r correct and have been deleted by bpsc ,there r three candidates X, Y and Z. all the three have solved 110 qsns but X has not attempted those 8 nos deleted qsns ,Y has attempted correctly 4 out of 8 deleted qsns and Z has attempted wrongly 8 deleted qsns.
now case 1 if only 4 wrong qsns were deleted, the marks would be as under
X=110,Y=106 and Z=102
case2 if 8 qsns(4 correct+4 wrong) were deleted ,the marks would be as under
X=110,Y=102 and Z=94
now qualifying no is 104 ……….so please think deeply about the poor Y………………..Y ka kya kasoor hai bpsc ne to ise jinda jla diya.
ATTEMPTED ???
Number of questions attempted by X=Y=Z=150 . it’s blunder to leave any question unattempted when there is no negative marking and for a deserving candidate two hours time is enough to attempt all questions .Every intelligent student must be/ is aware of this fact. hope you agree with me….
number of attempted questions for which mark sheets is declared for X, Y and Z is X=Y=Z=142.
so there is no question of making assumptions and then concluding that if X attempted this or Z not attempting that or n number of question from the deleted questions was correctly answerd by Y ….if X,Y,& Z are deserving candidates they must have attempted all within given time.
Y ka koi kasoor nahi hai…… he/she only performed a bit lesser than the others and why should Y think/consider that BPSC ne use jinda jla diya… there are many things to do beyond BPSC.
u r right Mr. Das. so v shud wait for the judgement dt. 06.09.2011.
judicial extra result published.
53-55 bpsc extra result coming soon…
The timing (i.e. one day before the hearing of 53rd-55th CCE case) of the declaration of extra result of Judicial Services signals that BPSC is going to admit tomorrow that they accept the mistake and will publish the extra result for 53d-55th CCE also following the same precedence (i.e. lowering the cutoff by 8 marks).
What is extra-ordinary is that the extra result of Judicial Services is about ~3800 (i.e. more than double of the original ~1700). It means that about ~5500 students will be appearing for mains when only ~15000 wrote the prelims exam. This clearly shows that for 53rd-55th CCE also, BPSC can manage 5-10K extra students (i.e. about 20K-25K) when about ~1.5L appeared for the prelims.
Hope we got to hear some good news tomorrow. Fingers crossed.
While publishing the RESULT BPSC Clarified the case of deletion so no chance at all for more result.
hope for the best…………
Disclosure:
I failed in BPSC…
Any news about BPSC main exam. date plz
very soon date wl be decleared
What about High Court Verdit
any news about todays bpsc hearing, i m too dipress bcoz my marks is 102, i hv no any career , i m totaly dependent on bpsc extra result , so please inform me about bpsc……………….
have u any news about todays bpsc hearing, pleas someone update, my marks is 98 , belongs to general…………….
Sunne mein aa raha hai ki 8 marks reduce karke extra result aayega. Tab toh aur jyada time lag sakta hai!
Apko jyada sunai padta hai….
ya apke antaratma ki awaj hai……..
any news from Patna high court…..?aaj bpsc ne court me kya kaha…?
BPSC got adjournment for today… Next hearing tomorrow…
Bpsc Mains december se pehle nahin hone wala
Any Update from PAtna High court regarding BPSC
DECISION KA KYA HUA KOI BATAYEGA
any news …
.
what happened today……about writ filed………please share to all friends.
i think at least 4 marks will have to lower in earlier cut off and the new cut off will be 100-gen,83-sc,82-st and 94- obc
please tell me about bpsc today hearing……. kya bpsc extra result degi…. my marks is 102
any news regarding court proceedings
exam will be from 8th of OCT….. start preparing guys….
Information about BPSC hearing in Patna High court
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/09/patna-high-court-slams-bpsc-on-52-55-pt.html
dear friends
As per tdy hearing it seems dat bpsc exam is going to b cancel…..tdy hon. Jugdge categorically said dat d whole exam & its result is vry victitious & unfair…next hearing tmory…so hold ur heart now…
All d best
Cancel hone par to anishchitata badh jayegi. Beech ka raasta nikle toh behtar hoga!
thanks ravi jee fr update
wht is d date for next hearing plz share
Yesterday there was no work at Patna High Court. Please do not give wrong information.
information is right, I was in court. judge said bpsc to take decision in a day otherwise he will pronounce judgement. Judge called experts inefficient.
If you are telling then it must be. I read in Hindustan that’s why I commented.
Ankit ji, court ka next hearing kab hoga..?ap ko kya lagta hia ki bpsc kya karne ki soch raha hai..?
Today, bpsc accepted its fault. Judge asked what are you doing for students? BPSC’s wakil replied that it will tell tomorrow after evaluation.
thanks a lot ankit jee fr update…..
thanks for information….plz keep update to all friends..
Bpsc is planning to cancel result.
cut off will be downed by 3 Marks. I have posted the reason earlier.
now lets thank to those 55 to 60 our great and daring friends who dared to file writ in high court .such people desperately required in our..society
Please do not give wrong information in this forum. Wait for the judgment before celebration. High Court will never ever give a judgment to reduce the cut-off arbitrarily. Where statutory part is violated there has to be sense about reduction of cut-off.Someone is telling 13 marks be reduced, someone tells 8 marks while other 3 marks.Some even say exam will be cancelled.Please have patience!
Kya extra result ayega aur agar ayega toh cut of kitna reduce hoga…
exam should cancelled for the sake of Bihar’s pride itself, for the sake of BPSC credibility and for the sake of quality of aspirant . exam should cancelled with stern punitive against BPSC officials and responsible official for exemplery punishment.
these 55-60 students are real crusader against corruption. we hats off before them, salute them, bow before them, congratulate them. these person are need of the society of real person of Bihar.
GOD BLESS THEM, GOD BLESS THEM, GOD BLESS THEM
THANK YOU VERY MUCH YOU ALL ,
THANKS AGAIN
The real and best soulutin will be cancel the PT exam with stern warning to don’t repeat. These problem are chronic as far as BPSC is concerned. Exemplary punishment is also required to be revamping the BPSC for its credebility. please cancel this prestigious exam for the sake of Bihar, its people, pride of bihar’s aspirants.
bhaiyo result aur nikalwa lo par mains jaldi karawo yaar, pagal bana diye iss bpsc ne.
Yesterday someone informed me 8 marks will be reduced! That seemed logical as it is the only possibility. Supreme Court and High Court have given similar verdict in the case of 27th Judiciary Exam.That is the only way to prevent cancellation of exam. Otherwise there will be unnecessary delay!
hua nahi to cancel the exam for sake of bihar,,kya hai ye ,ek to exam hote hi kam uper se tum jaise andaga lagane ko taiyar rahte ho,agli baar pass kar lena yaar…ab to peecha chod do.
well what about 15000 people who got selected in pt ..you all want to waste their 2-3 years hard work
cancellation of exam on what basis …i think judiciary exam judgement will not be applied on bpsc exam as their are a long pool of examine es…… and lowering 8 marks seems completely illogical…as it will call for extra 20000 people for mains…
But there are several right questions which are removed. Then there are questions with wrong answers which were used for evaluation. Then wrong answers are chosen as right options. These points are against BPSC. Therefore our honourable judge has a tedious task. Cancellation also is not welcome. Hence reduction of at least 8 marks is the only right option. In JPSC case these issues are not there.
JPSC result ( I am not an aspirant; so at least its an unbiased view) would not hold in the Court. SC and HCs of other states have cancelled exams/ results on the basis of crass reproduction of questions from the same source (UPSC PT in this case.)
Ye 8 question kya sirf fail hone wallo ke galat the ,kya aadar hai ye case karne ka,….
cancellation f exam,no way.15000+ students r not idiots.
Don’t worry! exam would not be cancelled. There will be some modifications in result (some reduction in cut-off ). And yes we are not idiots and we will show that in mains -)
josh hona aachi baat hai.gaamand kabhi kabhi insaan ko gustaak bana daita hai.
Bhai gusthakiyon me aap ustaad hain. JPSC wale post me iske kai udaharan hain. Aapne wahan kaafi badi badi batein ki hain. Confidence par sarkar aapka cpoyright nahi hai. (BTW, my response was for Dr. Naseem).
any update of today’s hearing?
kya bpsc extra result degi….my marks is 102……. please update………….
Jis kissi ne bhi mains qualify kiya hai use ye yaad rakhna chahiye ki agar petitioner challenge kiye gaye 21quest. par sahi hain to qualified candidates automatically disqualify kar jayenge.so now its not only a matter of 8 quest, bbut of 21 quest.
Bpsc ko exam cancel kar dena chahiye. agar ye apna patterns nahi sudharegi to baar galti karegi, wo pt ho ya means ye baat sab student ko shamaghni hogi ki jo pt me aa gaye hai ushe means or interview me bpsc procblem kar sakti hai q ki bpsc ka exam pattern hi galat hai.
my dear all friends please share correct information to all about court proceedings of last 2 days
Update on bpse jpsc
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/09/bpsc-accepts-fault-in-evaliation-in-52.html
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/09/jpsc-4th-pt-result-controversy-more.html
Today BPSC said that it will constitute new expert panel and existing expert panel will once again verify each question, and then it will take decision what to do. After evaluation it will report to court. Judge gave BPSC time till 14 November. So next date is 14 November. So long.
Very pathetic! How one will get motivation to study for mains? What type of experts are these? What is wrong is wrong and what is right is right? BPSC took more than 2 years to come out with 150 questions. Among them several discrepancies. Now they will research on these questions. This order is also amazing! If this is the scenario in objective paper then it will take ages to correct and evaluate main papers.I cannot even imagine how many experts will be needed in that case!They are simply playing with career of so many aspirants! Chief Minister have to recruit aliens to be civil servants of Bihar!Ideally they should reduce the cut-off by say 15 marks(at least!) and take main at the earliest. In this way they will have more things to learn.It is quite pertinent because as an aspirant one cannot think that a Commission can even make mistake while giving questions and then even selecting right answer. These experts shoud be penalised. After all they are not layman!
gaand maar diya
It seems that bpsc is on confrontational mood. This is an example of making simple thing difficult.
ab fresh result aaega
bpsc going to cancel the results.
mains aab april me hoga dosto.woh bhi gadbaddi ke saath
koi mujhe detail me batao,aaj court me kya hua………..kya court ne bpsc ko ek aur chance de diya……kya ab phir reevaluation karegi…aur agar wo sahi raha to phir uske accordingly result issue karegi..ye kaisa insaaf hai
/
re examining can make pass students to fail…… and fail students can pass ……is that you mean?
this is not right thing. exam should cancelled squarely with strong word and warning to BPSC that not repeat again in nex exam so on. this is palying with the students as well as future of Bihar state itself. the Hon’ble court should take cognijence to this kind of chronic blunder of BPSC time again. i think this is high time to take stern and punitive against the responsible. we all are greatful to BPSC, if they itself cancelled the whole exam
Mr M how many marks you have got in PT. I am sure you will not qualify if cutoff is decreased by 15 marks..
You always bark to cancel the exam. What about those who will have to reappear and prepare again for PT.
Decreasing cut off is OK. but barking for re-exam is idiotic. Better concentrate on your study otherwise you will fail in
other exams also. Even if exam is cancelled(which will never happen) you will fail again because of your barking attitude.
disgusting advice to cancel the exam … ….and then wait for next 3 years for new pt and further 1-2 years for mains …kyu bhai samay ki koi kadar nahi hai kya….
Dear M You should not write such worst advice, i can understand ur emotion but cancellation is not solution.
Decision of Patna High Court in Rectt. of Civil Judge:-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.5300 of 2011
==================================================
Akshey Lal Pandit
…. …. Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors.
…. …. Respondent/s
==================================================
with
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.5691 of 2011
==================================================
Rakesh Kumar
…. …. Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Anr
…. …. Respondent/s
==================================================
with
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.5708 of 2011
==================================================
Dayanand Singh
…. …. Petitioner/s
Versus
The Bihar Public Service Commission
…. …. Respondent/s
==================================================
with
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.5783 of 2011
==================================================
Abhilasha Singh
…. …. Petitioner/s
Versus
The Bihar Public Service Commission
…. …. Respondent/s
==================================================
with
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.5800 of 2011
==================================================
Subhankar Sharma,Advocate
…. …. Petitioner/s
Versus
The Bihar Public Service Commission
… …. Respondent/s
==================================================
with
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.5967 of 2011
==================================================
Awadhesh Kumar Singh
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
2
…. …. Petitioner/s Versus State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6075 of 2011 ================================================== Brajesh Kumar & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6162 of 2011 ================================================== Nirmal Kumar & Anr …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6244 of 2011 ================================================== Lavkush Kumar & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6388 of 2011 ================================================== Ravi Ranjan …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6406 of 2011 ================================================== Amardeep Lokpriya …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
3
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6454 of 2011 ================================================== Md.Akram Siddeeque & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6479 of 2011 ================================================== Shashank Shekhar Sinha …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================= with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6480 of 2011 ================================================== Amresh Garg & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6481 of 2011 ================================================== Sachin Kumar Mishra & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6495 of 2011 ================================================== Ashok Kumar & Anr …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6555 of 2011 ================================================== Krishna Mohan Thakur …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
4
================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6556 of 2011 ================================================== Pramod Kumar Pranav …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6589 of 2011 ================================================== Ranjeet Ranjan & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6642 of 2011 ================================================== Radhe Shyam & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6653 of 2011 ================================================== Sapna Rani & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6781 of 2011 ================================================== Ajit Kumar & Anr …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6853 of 2011 ================================================== Anant Kumar Sinha & Anr …. …. Petitioner/s
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
5
Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6989 of 2011 ================================================== Jitendra Singh & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7041 of 2011 ================================================== Ashok Kumar …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7043 of 2011 ================================================== Gopal Prasad Gupta …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Anr …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7049 of 2011 ================================================== Gaurav Sharma Kaushik …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7073 of 2011 ================================================== Surya Prakash & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7085 of 2011
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
6
================================================== Anuj Kumar …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7099 of 2011 ================================================== Rajesh Kumar …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The Bihar Public Service Commission …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7112 of 2011 ================================================== Ashish Singh & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7143 of 2011 ================================================== Sanjeev Kumar & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7162 of 2011 ================================================== Vijay Bardhan Pandey & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7176 of 2011 ================================================== Prabhat Ranjan …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
7
================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7178 of 2011 ================================================== Sarika Kumari …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7202 of 2011 ================================================== Santosh Kumar & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7241 of 2011 ================================================== Vivek Kumar Singh …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7289 of 2011 ================================================== Arun Kumar Dubey …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7295 of 2011 ================================================== Pavan Kumar Pandey & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7296 of 2011 ================================================== Rahul Kumar Jaiswal …. …. Petitioner/s
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
8
Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7489 of 2011 ================================================== Santosh Kumar Singh & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7734 of 2011 ================================================== Ravi Kant Choubey …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7876 of 2011 ================================================== Randhir Kumar Giri & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7877 of 2011 ================================================== Brajesh Kumar Singh & Anr …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7881 of 2011 ================================================== Kamal Kumar …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7882 of 2011
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
9
================================================== Aditya Kumar Pathak …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The Bihar Public Service Commission …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7883 of 2011 ================================================== Anita Ashvarya & Anr …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.8016 of 2011 ================================================== Deepak Kumar & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.8039 of 2011 ================================================== Amit Kumar Singh & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.8040 of 2011 ================================================== Ujjwal Kumar Sinha & Anr …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.8060 of 2011 ================================================== Manish Kumar & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
10
================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.8087 of 2011 ================================================== Abhishek Anand & Anr …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.8093 of 2011 ================================================== Braj Nandan & Ors …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.8118 of 2011 ================================================== Amit Roy …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No 8157 of 2011 ================================================== Anand Kumar Dubey & Anr. …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The Bihar Public Service Commission & Ors. …. …. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No 8177 of 2011 ================================================== Rajesh Kumar Rajshree …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The Bihar Public Service Commission & Ors. …. ….. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No 8198 of 2011 ================================================== Amit Kumar Pandey & Ors. …. …. Petitioner/s
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
11
Versus The State of Bihar & Ors. …. ….. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No 8288 of 2011 ================================================== Suraj Kumar & Anr. …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors. …. ….. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No 8361 of 2011 ================================================== Santosh Kumar …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors. …. ….. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No 8396 of 2011 ================================================== Anant Kumar …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors. …. ….. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No 8446 of 2011 ================================================== Deepak Kishor & Anr. …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The Bihar Public Service Commission & Ors. …. ….. Respondent/s ================================================== with CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No 8454 of 2011 ================================================== Manish Kumar Pandey …. …. Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors. …. ….. Respondent/s ==================================================
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
12
Appearance: (In CWJC No.5300 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Devendra Kr Sinha, AAG 2 (In CWJC No.5691 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. J.S. Arora, SC 6 (In CWJC No.5708 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dipak Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Pandey (In CWJC No.5783 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Das Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Pandey (In CWJC No.5800 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dipak Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Pandey (In CWJC No.5967 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kundan Bhadur Singh, SC 22 (In CWJC No.6075 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabi Bhushan Prasad No. 1 For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prahlad Kr. Bhagat, GP 13 (In CWJC No.6162 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshri, AAG 11 (In CWJC No.6244 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Shail Kumari, SC15 (In CWJC No.6388 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikram Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kr., SC 7 (In CWJC No.6406 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Radhika Raman, GP 23 (In CWJC No.6454 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kr. Ambasta, GP 14 (In CWJC No.6479 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Awdhesh Kumar Pandey, GA 9 (In CWJC No.6480 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prahlad Kr. Bhagat, GP 13 (In CWJC No.6481 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Srivastava For the Respondent/s : Mr. Subhash Pd. Singh, GA 7 (In CWJC No.6495 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. V.M.K Sinha, AAG 13
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
13
(In CWJC No.6555 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brajesh Prasad Gupta For the Respondent/s : Mr. Abhay Shankar Jha, SC 14 (In CWJC No.6556 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajoy Kumar Chakraborty For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.A. Alam, SC3 (In CWJC No.6589 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Brijnandan For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D. Sanjay ,AAG 12 (In CWJC No.6642 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sarvendra Kumar Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajeev Kr. Singh, GP 15 (In CWJC No.6653 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Pravina Kumari For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Neelu Agrwal, GA 6 (In CWJC No.6781 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandeep Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Sachin, GP 24 (In CWJC No.6853 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Anju Kumari @ Anju Narain For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Namrta Mishra, Gp 17 (In CWJC No.6989 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kishore Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kundan Bhadur Singh, SC 22 (In CWJC No.7041 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr No.2, GA 5 (In CWJC No.7043 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. R.K.Verma, SC 27 (In CWJC No.7049 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay, SC 11 (In CWJC No.7073 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anish Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Nasarool Hoda Khan, SC 18 (In CWJC No.7085 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shanti Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Subhash Pd. Singh, GA 7 (In CWJC No.7099 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Anshuman For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Pandey (In CWJC No.7112 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sri Krishna Ranjan For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kundan Bahadur Singh, SC 22 (In CWJC No.7143 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Narayan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Radhika Raman, GP 23 (In CWJC No.7162 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Brijnandan For the Respondent/s : Mr. Abhay Shankar Jha, SC 14
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
14
(In CWJC No.7176 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG 10 (In CWJC No.7178 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.S. Shabbar Hussain, GP 4 (In CWJC No.7202 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Radhika Raman, GP 23 (In CWJC No.7241 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Girija Shankar Pd., GP 1 (In CWJC No.7289 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Dubey (In Person) For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Priaydarshi, SC 17 (In CWJC No.7295 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur For the Respondent/s : Mr. Neeraj Nandan, GP 20 (In CWJC No.7296 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajan For the Respondent/s : Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, AAG 7 (In CWJC No.7489 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr No.1, SC 12 (In CWJC No.7734 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG 10 (In CWJC No.7876 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Awdhesh Kumar Pandey, GA 9 (In CWJC No.7877 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bauye Jee Jha (B.J. Jha) For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr No.1, SC 12 (In CWJC No.7881 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Prasad Gupta For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Namrta Mishra, GP 17 (In CWJC No.7882 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandan Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Pandey (In CWJC No.7883 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Narayan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. K.P. Gupta, SC 16 (In CWJC No.8016 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Namrta Mishra, GP 17 (In CWJC No.8039 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajesh Kr.Verma, SC 27 (In CWJC No.8040 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brajesh Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. G.K. Agrwal, GA 10
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
15
(In CWJC No.8060 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishiraj Sinha, GP 19 (In CWJC No.8087 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kalyan Shankar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashok Kr Choudhry, SC 13 (In CWJC No.8093 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. M. D. Dwivedi, SC 23 (In CWJC No.8118 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Harendra Pd. Singh, GA 8 (In CWJC No.8157 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Anshuman For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Rita Kumari Upadhyaya (In CWJC No.8177 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Anshuman For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Rita Kumari Upadhyaya (In CWJC No.8198 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K. Tripathy Mr. Amit Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, A.C. to G.P. 22 (In CWJC No.8288 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Bidhan Chandra Jha (In CWJC No.8361 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S.M. Shabbir Alam Mr. Sanjay Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. D.K. Singh, A.C. to G.P. V (In CWJC No.8396 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Rahi For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, A.C. to A.A.G. 3 (In CWJC No.8446 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abinash Chandra Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Pandey (In CWJC No.8454 of 2011) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. K.K. Jha, SC 4 ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
16
05
11.05.2011
This group of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution are filed by the learned Advocates to challenge the result of the preliminary test conducted by the Bihar Public Service Commission for recruitment to 217 vacancies in the Subordinate Judiciary of the State of Bihar.
The main challenge in these writ petitions is four fold. First; the Bihar Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as „the Commission‟) has no authority to conduct preliminary examination prior to the competitive examination contemplated under the Bihar Judicial Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1955. Second; the disputed preliminary examination was conducted on the basis of the Bihar Civil Service (Judicial Branch) (Recruitment) (Amendment) Rules, 2008 ignoring the subsequent amendment by Amendment Rules of 2009. Prior to the amendment by the Amendment Rules of 2009 the reservation was confined to the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates; whereas under the Amendment Rules of 2009 the benefit of reservation has been extended to Backward Class and the Extremely Backward Class candidates also. Thus, by not following the Amendment Rules of 2009, the candidates belonging to the Backward Class and the Extremely Backward Class have been deprived of the benefit of reservation. In other words, they are compelled to compete with the other candidates in General Category. Third; the dispute is in respect of the omission of 25
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
17
questions from consideration. According to the petitioners some of those 25 questions did not have the correct option but the others had the correct option. The candidates who have attempted such questions and answered correctly stand to disadvantage on account of the omission of those questions from consideration. Fourth; the petitioners have challenged the decision of the Commission to allow only 10 per cent of the total examinees to take the competitive examination contrary to the Supreme Court direction to allow the candidates to take competitive examination in the proportion of 1:10 i.e. for every single vacancy at least 10 candidates should be allowed to take the competitive examination. Some of the Lawyers have referred to the question papers and the alternative answers. They have tried to demonstrate that most of the questions omitted from consideration had the correct answer.
The petitions are contested by the Commission. Learned Additional Advocate General Mr. Lalit Kishore has appeared for the Commission. He has submitted that the matter of recruitment to the Subordinate Judicial Service is seized by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court. The matter is yet pending before the Hon‟ble Supreme Court. He has submitted that the Hon‟ble Supreme Court has, in its order dated 3rd December 2010, taken note of the advertisement
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
18
dated 9th August 2008 and the Rules then existing i.e. as they stood prior to amendment by the Amendment Rules of 2009. In the circumstances, the Hon‟ble Supreme Court observed; “…..In light of the said order there was no occasion for the State or for the Public Service Commission to hold any doubt on the question of applicability of rules for filling up the existing 217 vacancies. We have been informed that preliminary examination for said recruitments had been held on 31st December, 2009, but the results were not announced because of the aforesaid controversy. We direct that in so far as these 217 vacancies are concerned, the process of recruitment already initiated shall be expedited and completed, preferably within six months. This exercise shall be completed notwithstanding any interim orders by any Court.”
He has submitted that in view of the aforesaid direction issued by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court the Commission was required to proceed in accordance with the Rules as they stood prior to the Amendment Rules of 2009. He has submitted that by Rule 2 of the Amendment Rules of 2008, the Commission is expressly empowered to hold preliminary examination and to allow only 10 % of the total examinees to attend the competitive examination. Accordingly, the preliminary examination has been held; the result is declared and the Commission has allowed around 10 per cent of the examinees to attempt the competitive written
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
19
examination. He has also relied upon the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the matter of Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission Vs. Baloji Badhavath and others [(2009)5 SCC 1]. In the said judgment the Hon‟ble Supreme Court has considered the scope and ambit of the preliminary examination. The Court has, in paragraph 25 of the judgment, observed, “How the Commission would judge the merit of the candidates is its function. Unless the procedure adopted by its is held to be arbitrary or against the known principles of fair play, the superior courts would not ordinarily interfere therewith…..” “29.Indisputably, the preliminary examination is not a part of the main examination. The merit of candidate is not judged thereby. Only an eligibility criterion is fixed. The papers for holding the examination comprise of general studies and mental ability. Such a test must be held to be necessary for the purpose of judging the basic eligibility of the candidates to hold the tests. How and in what manner the State as also the Commission would comply with the constitutional requirements of Article 335 of the Constitution of India should ordinarily not be allowed to be questioned.”
In view of the above referred direction issued by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in its order dated 3rd December 2010, we are of the opinion that for filling up 217 vacancies
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
20
advertised, the Commission has rightly followed the Rules as they stood prior to the amendment by the Amendment Rules of 2009. The question of validity of a preliminary examination is set at rest by several judgments of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court over the years. It is well settled that in case of large number of applicants compared to the number of vacancies advertised, the Public Service Commission or any agency for that matter may hold a preliminary examination to shortlist the number of candidates who may be allowed to take the competitive examination/interview. In the present case against the 217 vacancies advertised the applications received were more than 21,000. In view of comparatively large number of applicants, in our opinion, the Commission was fully justified in holding the preliminary test with a view to shortlisting the candidates eligible to take the competitive examination. In any case, for the present matter, the Commission is expressly empowered to hold a preliminary test.
In the present case, as provided under the Amendment Rules of 2008, 10 per cent of the candidates appearing in the examination have been declared successful to take the competitive written examination. We see no error in the decision of the Commission to restrict the number of successful candidates for taking the competitive examination
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
21
to 10 per cent of the total examinees. Next question is about omission of 25 questions from consideration. It is submitted that preliminary examination was divided into two papers; one of General studies for 100 marks and second of Law paper for 150 marks. Out of 150 questions set out in the paper of Law, 19 questions had a doubtful answer and in the paper of General Studies, 6 questions had some controversy in respect of the correct answer. In the circumstances, the Commission has decided to omit the said 25 questions from consideration and to declare result on the basis of 225 questions alone. The aforesaid omission is disturbing. It is beyond our comprehension that the constitutional institution, specialized in making recruitment, aided by the experts such as the Commission should set the question papers without ensuring that the optional answers contain the correct answer. This also speaks volumes about the sincerity with which the examination papers are set by the paper setters. It is quite possible that some of the examinees have correctly attempted some of those 25 questions. They would certainly stand to lose on account of omission of those 25 questions from consideration.
In the interest of justice, we consider it expedient that the Commission should extend its result or the qualifying marks by 25 marks. Meaning thereby that all those
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
22
candidates who have failed to secure 154 marks (last one of the qualified candidate) but have secured 129 or more marks, should also be considered qualified to take the competitive examination. The Commission will publish a supplementary merit list of the candidates who have secured less than 154 marks but 129 marks or more in the preliminary test. Same direction will apply to the candidates in the categories of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes. Learned Additional Advocate General Mr. Lalit Kishore has strongly objected. He has submitted that the aforesaid direction is in contravention of the statutory Rules. He has submitted that if the aforesaid direction is permitted to stand, the Commission will have to allow around 40 per cent of the examinees to take the competitive written examination instead of 10 per cent of the examinees permitted by the Rules. He has submitted that in the past whenever such controversy arose the Hon‟ble Supreme Court has approved the omission of disputed questions from consideration and declaration of result on the limited or truncated marks.
We are alive to both the situations. But, as discussed hereinabove the declaration of the result based on truncated question paper will lead to injustice to at least some of the examinees. We are also of the opinion that the constitutional institute like the Commission cannot be allowed to take the things so casually. Therefore, in spite of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.5691 of 2011 (5) dt.11-05-2011
23
statutory Rules; we have issued the above directions to mitigate the injustice that may be caused to some of the examinees. Lest we may have to direct the Commission to hold the preliminary examination afresh. That would delay the recruitment process already delayed. On the other hand, except that the Commission will have to arrange written examination for larger number of examinees, no prejudice is going to be caused to the Commission. Subject to the above directions all these petitions are disposed of. We also clarify that these directions are subject to the ultimate decision that will be rendered by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the proceeding pending before it.
S.Sb/-
(R.M. Doshit, CJ.) (Jyoti Saran, J.)
PLI / CWJC NUMBER MALUM HO TO KOI BATAYE. JISSE CASE STATUS KI JANKARI PATNA HIGH COURT KE WEBSITE SE PATA KIUYA JA SAKE.
Pass studendent ko fail karne ke peche kya logic ho sakta hai..? Kyonki pass hue studnt ne allready mains ke leye form bhar diya hai..bpsc khud to confused hai hi saath me un student ko bhi confuse kar raha hai jo din raat mehnat kar strugle kar rahe hain..
53-55th bpsc pt se sambandhit patna high court mein file kiya gaya PLI /CWJC KA VASTVIK NUMBER KYA HAI ?
Friends, keeping in view the decision of Hon’ble Patna High Court given in case of 27th Bihar Judicial Services (Preliminary) Competitive Examination as pasted by me above, then additional result might come in 53-55th CC(P)CE, 2011 by lowering cut-off marks 13-15. Para 21-23 are very relevant and I advice all of u to read those paragraphs.
saalon kamine gandi nali ke kidon padhai likhai to karoge nahi sochoge dsp ban jayen dm ban jayen tum sab chaprasi banne ke layak bhi nahi ho. court case karte ho tum sab jaise gandi nali ke kide u all r ugly vulgur etc. tum sab panchvarisiya yogna bpsc ko bana dete ho tum sab ki jindgi itni hi sust hai aalsi suar kahin ke . kamino agar mere khilaf comment likha to pichbare me rod kar dunga. himmat hai to mere khilaf likh ke dikhao .
chotta m bansh kar dunga saala tumko bahut advice deta hai be advice rakho apne pichware me saala chotta
chotta m ko lagta hai ki below 20 marks aaya hai beta agli baar bhi disqulify hi rahoge teri yahi aukat hai.
kamino ye blog padhne walon ke liye hai tum sab jaise chotton ke liye nahi
विशेषज्ञ जांचेंगे बीपीएससी परीक्षा की गड़बड़ी
Sep 10, 01:00 am
पटना, विधि संवाददाता
बिहार लोक सेवा आयोग (बीपीएससी) की प्रारंभिक जांच परीक्षा (पीटी) में हुई गड़बड़ियों की जांच विशेषज्ञ करेंगे। पटना हाईकोर्ट के न्यायाधीश अजय कुमार त्रिपाठी की पीठ ने यह फैसला सुनाते हुए कहा कि जांच रिपोर्ट 14 नवंबर तक पेश की जाये। वे शुक्रवार को मनोज कुमार व अन्य की याचिकाओं पर सुनवाई कर रहे थे।
न्यायालय ने जांच करने वाली विशेषज्ञों की टीम में उन लोगों को शामिल करने से मना कर दिया है, जिनके चलते परीक्षा में प्रश्न एवं उत्तर संबंधी दोष पाये गये। जांच पूरी होने तक लिखित परीक्षा नहीं होगी।
सुनवाई के दौरान वरीय अधिवक्ता ममन कुमार मिश्र ने कोर्ट को बताया कि कुल 150 अंकों की पीटी परीक्षा होनी थी किन्तु गलत प्रश्न दिये जाने के कारण सिर्फ 142 अंकों पर परीक्षा ली गयी। जिन 8 प्रश्नों को हटाया गया, उसमें भी गड़बड़िया थीं। लिहाजा परीक्षा रद कर इसे नये सिरे से आयोजित किया जाये।
बीपीएससी के वरीय अधिवक्ता ललित किशोर ने स्वीकार किया कि तकनीकी रूप में कुछ गड़बड़ियां हुई हैं। इसे सुधार लिया जाएगा। उनका कहना था कि नये सिरे से परीक्षा आयोजित करना संभव नहीं है। उन्होंने अदालत को आश्वस्त किया कि भूल सुधार लिया जाएगा, जबकि दूसरी ओर वरीय अधिवक्ता श्री मिश्र के अनुसार केवल इतने से काम नहीं चलेगा। बार-बार परीक्षा में गड़बड़ी होने से मेधावी छात्रों का भविष्य चौपट होता है। सही छात्रों का चयन नहीं हो पाता है। सुनवाई अधूरी रही।
Hi, i m new to this blog
मुख्य परीक्षा पर कोर्ट की रोक
पीटी के प्रश्नपत्र में गड़बड़ी
पटना : पटना हाइकोर्ट ने बिहार लोक सेवा आयोग की 53 वीं से 55 वीं तक की प्रारंभिक प्रतियोगिता परीक्षा, 2011 में प्रश्नपत्र में त्रुटियों की नयी विशेषज्ञ कमेटी से दो महीने के भीतर जांच करा कर रिपोर्ट सौंपने का निर्देश दिया है. अदालत ने रिपोर्ट आने तक मुख्य परीक्षा के आयोजन पर भी रोक लगा दी है.
इस संबंध में आयोग को 14 नवंबर तक शपथ पत्र दायर करने को कहा गया है. अदालत ने प्रश्नपत्र में त्रुटियों के मामले की शुक्रवार को सुनवाई की. न्यायमूर्ति अजय कुमार त्रिपाठी के एकल पीठ ने अभ्यर्थियों की याचिका की सुनवाई करते बीपीएससी को 53वीं-55वीं सम्मिलित संयुक्त प्रारंभिक प्रतियोगिता परीक्षा, 2011 के प्रश्नपत्र और मॉडल उत्तर पत्र में कथित गड़बड़ियों की जांच नयी विशेषज्ञ कमेटी से कराने का निर्देश दिया.
उन्होंने मुकदमे की सुनवाई पूरी होने तक 53वीं – 55वीं सम्मिलित संयुक्त मुख्य परीक्षा के आयोजन पर भी रोक लगा दी. उन्होंने पुराने विशेषज्ञों की कमेटी को इस जांच कार्य से अलग रखने का निर्देश दिया.
उल्लेखनीय है कि संयुक्त प्रारंभिक परीक्षा, 2011 में प्रश्नपत्र और मॉडल उत्तर पत्र में गड़बड़ियों का आरोप लगाते हुए कुछ असफ़ल अभ्यर्थियों ने आयोग के परीक्षा परिणाम को अदालत में चुनौती दी थी. आयोग ने प्रारंभिक परीक्षा बीते 17 अप्रैल को 34 जिलों में 438 परीक्षा केंद्रों पर आयोजित करायी थी.
अदालत ने कहा कि यदि उत्तर पुस्तिका की जांच में किसी प्रकार की गड़बड़ी या त्रुटि हुई है, तो कमेटी को उसकी पहचान करनी चाहिए. अदालत को बताया गया कि प्रारंभिक परीक्षा की कॉपियों की जांच में कई प्रकार की गड़बड़ियां की गयी हैं.
150 अंकों के सवालों को जांचने के क्रम में कई प्रश्नों को मनमाने तरीके से हटा दिया गया. याचिकाकर्ता की शिकायत थी कि कई सवालों के उत्तर गलत निर्धारित किये गये थे. इस ओर ध्यान दिलाये जाने पर अपने तरीके से अंकों में कटौती की गयी.
BPSC ki jai ho….. Ek baar phir sabko latkaya
thank for my all brothers disscass se bahut saport mila panel jo bpsc ka question ka verification karege wo bhi minimum 8 cutt off down karege ,above bhi ho sakta hai jinka 96+hai prepation start kar dena right rahega ..thanks agin jinhone ye case fight kiya thanks my all brother sussecss & jo 14 nov. Ke bad list me add honge ..
bpsc faaltuuuuuuuuuuu hai dost
BPSC na sudhri. this organisation has been taken student, people of Bihar, honest poor student taken for granted. it has been succeeded doing since long. for a remedial step the exam should cancelled immediately and punitive and stern against responsible. BPSC playing with serious and meritorious students for a long. again repeat, exam should cancelled and certainly will cancell
dear” m”,y u want exam to be cancelled?will u not be able to make if cut off is cut down to 8 marks?if not then u should stop preparing,15000+ students r not fools.
M dosent has courage even to reveal his name…..!!pathetic ……!!
mr m u have know only one word stern. u has no any merit yr thinking standard is like pig. i think u have get below 20 marks. teri jo mentility hai ushe pata chal raha hai ki tum kitne meritorious student ho. exam 50 baar cancel ho jaye tere jaison ki aukat jo hai wahi rahegi . tum sab apne life ki nahi to dusron ki life ke bare me to socho. tum sabse to kuch hone se raha. tum jaison ke liye time koi mayne nahi rakhta hai kam se kam dusron ka socho.
Ankit ji plz kya bata sakte hai ki court me woh kaun kaun se question the jin ko le kar confusion tha…As I have heard that at least thre are 15 quistion creating confusion among students..
Mr. VK Singh , you are absolute right that i have nothing knowledge. It does not means that an organisation like BPSC is free to do wrong thing and play with aspirant, poor students and state Bihar. This kind of act would erode confidence of students, future generation of students, and law abiding citizens. Mr. Singh , i personally think you are genius students and enough to cracks the nuts, i wish u for sucess in this competitioin. No matter what u articulating in your sough(mail).
It is my personal belif that Exam should Cancelled. and again repeat that conducting exam shoul OUTSOURCE to other Organisation like UPSS, SSC or other examination body. BPSC is chronic failure to conduct the exam and they take exam very lightly and play with future of the aspirants.
again i would say that EXAM SHOULD CANCELLED.
BPSC is going to go for stright jacket formula provided by Supreme Court in Judiciary PT Case. and deduct 8 marks from cutoff or add 8 marks to the score of candidate and publish new result.
Candidates who are well prepared for the mains need not worry about how many people will give mains exam. More competition should bring the best in them. All the best.
kisi bhi cheez ko barbad karna hai to court case kar do. i hate these type of guys. in chutiyon ke liye time koi mayne nahi rakhta hai. shame.court case to fashion ban gaya hai. kitna bhi fresh exam. karwa lo ye chutiyen sab yahi karenge. exam. delay karwayenge aaj tak ka yahi record hai. mere khilaf comment likha to samagh lo marthe thappar se thik kar dunga. chutia kamina .
all of my dear friends ,ye kyu nahi sochte ho ki bpsc bar bar is tarah se kar raha hai iske liye fight karna chahiye na ki personel faayda soch rakhoge to har baar bpsc ka process for every exam atleast 30 se 40 month lagata rahega isliye VK SINGH jaise log sudharo nahi to bar bar hota rahega………………………..
i personally believe tht if wrong question were asked then cut off should be deduced by same number f marks,n i advocate for extra result though i m selected.my anguish is against those who want exam to be cancelled.do they want cut off to be reduced to 20 marks,n wat abt time lapse.those who r dreaming tht exam will be cancelled they should wake up n face d truth tht they r not going to be selected ,even wen cut off is reduced by 8 marks.
There are many ifs and buts in the arguments of above sought and arguments given in the Hon’ble court. so it be fair to Exam should cancelled. No matter what anyone say. Truth should prevail.
truth will definetly prevail,w8 fr it.
though i missed the pt by a whisker, i personally am against this general mood of getting the exam cancelled.it will again put the whole process in jeopardy going by the past records of BPSC. The best option which I would suggest that BPSC should have considered was to get the qualifying marks reduced rather than lingering on the process. Without any intention to hurt anyone I am even comfortable with getting this process completed but not without a very stern warning to BPSC, and wait for the next notification which would have come in time had there been not this case in Honorable HC. BPSC has again got an excuse for its old habit of inordinate delay in completion of the exam.
Mr. ………If u were knowing the fault in question paper then y waited for result……u could have gone the court immediately…………it shows ur sincerity , this is what I have to say Mr. truth
BPSC information regarding the court hearing….
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/09/bpsc-accepts-fault-in-evaliation-in-52.html
All report on the court hearing at single place regarding BPSC.
I found it useful so sharing with my friend
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/09/bpsc-to-constitute-new-expert-pannel.html
Dear all, what I feel accusing Mr.V.K.Singh is not good since he is not wrong when he writes correct thing. Neither he is selfish, he has all the right to say what he feels. Really it is shameful to those who wish the exam to be cancelled. If really you think BPSC was wrong then y u waited for so long. Now when u r not selected then started accusing (selfish people)……..angur khatta hai……. though i also admit there were few question wrong but it was for all not only for you…..but this i with guarantee can say there was not any kind of malpractice in preparing result. If u doubt then u ask for reevaluation for ur answersheet. I bet u ll get same mark. Cancellation is not solution I am with Mr Singh .
It’s not sarcastic it’s real!
Even BPSC knew that the Commission was wrong.That’s why they admitted that wrong questions will be deleted!Even then they deleted right question also. After that also they want two months for another set of experts to find total mistakes. Chap! imagine what will happen in next steps of selection process!So I think better wait for so called experts ( do not know how many more to come! )
expert jitne wrong question decleared karege waisa cutt off down hoga ..but bpsc accept 8 question kiya hai..to kya panel & bpsc me contrvarcy nahi hoga.ye logic mere mind se bahar hai ..mere koi big brother bata sakte hai please..
I have felt bad by going through some coments in bad words. Mr. Singh and some other friends have used abussive language. Please donot do this.
You are welcome with your strongest possible view in favour or against but in civilised manner only.In anyway court we give the best possible settlement…… it is too much time taking….but it is general problem of our country…..
what will be date of mains examination please any one tell me….
thanks
Bihar has already a bad name outside……
please do not let it be too worse….
with our developmental achievement and changed atmosphere Bihar risising upwards…
we shoud rather work and behave in a way which add to the process of regaining the glory of Bihar again…..
Thanks ANKIT JEE and all FRIENDS. Please keep on updating. It helps specially people like me as i stay in Andhra Pradesh and depend upon this source for uptodate information.
no matter…what
Mains will happen in December with some additional result…
here is an important topic …i fount it informative for BPSC Mains so sharing here..
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/09/patna-kalam-paintings-introduction.html
u sure they are providing extra results
sunne me aa rha hai ki 96 pr result ayega mains february me hoga
I don’t know about additional results but exam will be held in Feb’ 2012 according to unimpeachable source in BPSC. Judicial Services Exam will be held in Dec’2011. It is also been considered seriously by BPSC that they shall be giving questions as per UPSC Mains pattern. So guys sharpen your writting speed. All the best.
Thanx…for this info. Keep sharing any news you have
bpsc cutt off marks down karega ye to fixed hai but how much no idia anybudy………….
mr M you r right brother
mr M u r rite
BPSC has prepared additional result. Whenever any direction will be received from High Court they will anounce additional result. Friends start preparing by tooth and nail. Do not bother about any speculations. Cut off will be down by 5 to 8 Marks
thanks sir my marks is 103 hai mera ho jayega.
are u sure they are lowering down the cut off marks…..wt is ur source, no one else here is saying this
bpsc judicary additional result & bpsc accept exam will be not cancelation result reformation so bpsc cutt down 5to 8 marks conform…
mr. M you r right
xxx
New batch we are starting on 11 th october (a capsule course batch of 15 days), if wish join us for garanteed security.
how to join the evergreen claases send me detail
New crash course batch is starting on 11th october for 12 days.
patna me rahne wale doston kya kuch ho raha hai is wakt bpsc ki ur se please share karen
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/10/bpsc-considers-give-additional-result.html
BPSC will give some additional result after november 14
Mains will be taken in Feb
bhoshriwalon khush ho jao ab gadhe bhi exam. denge. kya nautanki hoga 40000 students in mains ye chutiye sab yahi to chahte hai. chutiye ho tum sab jo extra result mang rahe ho. mains me aukat pata chal jayega. tum sab chutiyon ke liye time mayne nahi rakhta hai. gandi nali ke kidon chutiyon . mere khilaf jo sabse pahle likhega wo sabse bada chutiya hoga. kamino chutiya kahin ka.
Please, is site ki garima banaye rakhe.
mr m u r looser.
mr R K Mishra , garima kya hoti hai. kya ye koi ladki hai than fuck it.
v k singh tum itna darte kyo ho? Man lo pre me 2700 examinee pass hote aur tum 1 number se fail ho jate to? Jis temper ke tum ho lagta hai ki tum tab bpsc ko aag lga dete. Sorry i m not provoking you but ek sujhaw hai don’t loose temper bocoz u r not looser.
Apni jindgi se kaffi udas lagte ho, vivah nahi hua kya?
Allah tumhe slamat rakhe.
Bpsc me to hoga…………. esliye dusri naukari talash karo nahito budda ho jaoge koe ladki sadi bhi nahi karegi .
12500 aur result aa rha hai. Next cut off for gen is 98. Ummid karte hai ki kam se kam apni garima ko bacha lo ya tumhari marzy…..
Bpsc mains next year jun/ july me hoga, interview 2013 march me hoga , joining 2014 election ke bad hoga.
Mr vk singh, Nitish kumar ko bhi kuchh prawchan ……..etc.?
Mr vk singh u r real looser. U have lost your moral, temper, age, money, young life without wife.
Koe bat nahi teen sal aur sahi.
Abe Saale Kuch Karke Aaye Ho Exam Main Jo Pass Ho Jaoge…… Kyon Apne Baap ka Paise Bekar kar rahe ho….. Kisi Railway Station ke Pass Khoka Le Lo Aur Chai Aur Toast Becho….. Aur Phir Kabhi BPSC Ka Exam Dene Ka Khyal Apne Maan Main Mat Laana….. Tumne Jo Kuch Uper Likha Hai…. Kya Yahi Teri BPSC (Mains) 2011 ki Prepration Hai… Yahi PadtaTha Raat Raat Bhar Baithe Ke…. V K Singh Sudhar Jaa Saale Nahi Bahut Maar Padegi….. Aur Shadi Bhi Nahi Hogi…….. Haath Main Le Kar Dolta Rahiyo…….. Aur Tu Shadi ka khayal Apne Mann Se Nikal De….. Befaltu kisi ladki ki zindagi kahrab karega….. Tumhara Exam Controler… (BPSC)
abe kiran lagta hai tum hizre ho saale tere maa baap ne tera naam soch samagh ke rakha tha saale chhake gand phar dunga bhohri wala
Dear Parmar bhai I am 200% agree with you, that guy is completely illiterate and perhaps he has passed first time in any examination, his words are not like a good citizen and not good for the elite class, He only knows how to abuse others, again he will use some good words whatsoever he knows, I am also listening his statement for a long time,
Dear all of my friends I don’t think that there is need to take attention about his statement, If you don’t give attention to his statement, one day he will automatically silent.
So please, to save the prestige of this great blog (given by anubhuti sir) don’t take attention any of his statement.
thanks
Ravi Singh Rajput
mr. parmar i m only 26 year old group B officer in central govt. as engg. dont give advice to me. apna socho and u lost yr temper hamne personal comment nahi kiya tha maine chutiya wali bichardhara pe comment kiya tha. per tumne personal comment kiya aisa uchait nahi hai . main bhi personal comment kar sakta huin but according to me its not right.
mr singh…it is not a question of personal comment or general comment…it is a very good platform provided by mr srivastava to exchange our views….so it is our responsibility to maintain the sanctity of this place. And as u have said u r a central govt gr b officer…it absolutely doesnt suit ur professional etiquette as well as u as an individual to use such filthy language and u must agree with me. We must express ourselves but within the dignified boundry of moral strength and character…whatever has to happen that will happen we should learn to take it in our stride and move forward rather than spend our valuable time in cribbing…..and u r very young u have upsc left with u…u can go anywhere u desire…let bpsc decide what it has to do….
kiran tum hizre ho saale apna naam to dekho
DEAR Ravi Singh Rajput U R RIGHT PER AUR SAB MERE BIRODHI CHUTIYE HAIN.
SAARE HIZRE MERE BIRODHI HO GAYE HAIN. DONT GIVE ADVICE TO ME KAMINO.
DEAR Ravi Singh Rajput tum chutia no. 1 ho.
madharchoood v k sallaaaaaaa aaahir ka aulad randaaaaaaaaaaa
Anubhuit je keya ho raha hai….
kuch kareay????
mahesh saale gaali de rahe ho mardarchod to tum ho teri maa ke ……………
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/10/ranchi-high-court-to-hear-jpsc-4th-pt.html
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/08/mukhyamantri-kanya-suraksha-yojna-of.html
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/08/role-of-national-bank-for-agriculture.html
DO some reading mains will be conducted in feb only 3 month left….
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/08/sampoorna-gramin-rozgar-yojana-sgry.html
BPSC is yet to constitute the expert group
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/10/bpsc-yet-to-settle-53-55-civil-services.html
no one want to became the expert because they will became black listed …
JAI HOOOO
BHAGWAN HI MALIK HAI
JO HOGA 14 NOV KO HOGA
10000+ results is coming soon
wait till 14 nov
cheers up
what is the source dear kiran, and what will be the cut off marks
gen would be 99+
it would be 99 for gen obc will be 95
KIRAN, WHEN MATTER IS PENDING BEFORE COURT, ANY PREDICTION ABOUT ADDL. RESULT IS BASELESS.
mahesh tu kish nasal ka hai wo tune gaali deke dhikha diya . main tumhara gaali tumko lauta raha huin. ek baat yaad rakhna kabhi kisi maa ko gaali nahi dena . teri bhi maa hai gaali duin to kaisa lagega . main tere jaisa ghatia insaan nahi huin . tum gandi naali ke kide ho. tere jaisa insaan samuche samj ko sada raha hai.
The eager wait of about sixty thousands applicant who appeared in the 4th JPSC Civil services examination may come to an end in coming week. The expert committee constituted by the JPSC for looking into the errors in the model answers released by the commission earlier, has presented its findings.
As per the sources close to the development, the expert committee has found the allegation to be correct and the JPSC is likely to include fresh names in its list of candidates who cleared the PT examination.
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/10/jpsc-to-resolve-result-dispute-soon.html
mahesh U R NO. 1 GANDI NALI KI PAIDAISH HO.
mahesh u r dog saale gaali deta hai bhosriwala itna maar paregi ki naam apna bhool jayega bhoshri kahi ka.
I DONT WANT TO USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE LEKIN MAHESH JAISA GHATIA INSAN AISA KARNE DE TAB NA.
any latest news about bpsc
Bihar Government has appointed Mr K.C Saha as the chairman of Bihar Public Service Commission.Saha is an senior IAS officer of 1975 batch earlier he was working as Development Commissioner .
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/11/kc-saha-appointed-chairman-of-bihar.html
additional result will come 100% sure
Bihar Government has appointed Mr K.C Saha as the chairman of Bihar Public Service Commission.Saha is an senior IAS officer of 1975 batch earlier he was working as Development Commissioner .
Bihar Government has appointed Mr K.C Saha as the chairman of Bihar Public Service Commission.Saha is an senior IAS officer of 1975
start preparing
tnx for information
news is coming that 3 marks will reduce
but wait 14 nov
Some more result will be released by BPSC……
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/11/patna-high-court-to-hear-matter.html
Good news for poor UPSC aspirants Ashoak singh will guide you free to crack IAS exam
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/11/super-25-to-rock-in-ias-examinationwill.html
According to the source close to development Bihar Public Service Commission has filed an affidavit in Patna high court in matter associated with 53-55 Civil services examination.
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/11/bpsc-has-filed-affidavit-in-patna-high.html
BPSC COUNTER AFFIDAVIT
Three more questions deleted
1. 50 percent women reservation in panchayati raj
2. airlines destinations from patna
3. what is minerals
two questions added
1. commercial energy: answer A
2. Rolling plan: all statements are true
what is going in court. are 3 questions other than those 8 or part of that 8
DELETED 3 QUESTIONS ARE OTHER THAN THOSE 8
AND ADDED 2 QUESTIONS ARE PART OF THAT 8
thanks ratish jee.could u do me a favour and tell me which three question are they?
I HAVE ALREADY MENTIONED IT. PLEASE SEE MY EARLIER COMMENT.
o ya i am sorry ,acually iam so nervous that i cant tell you
what will be the cut off,has the court hearing started,what are the chances?
plz provide me some current happenings in hc.kya hoga,
any news? plz share!
ravish jee pla kuch to batiye kya ho raha hai,aur kya hoga
plz koi to batao kya ho raha hai
ppllzz koi to batao kya hua
bpsc is buying time…nothing else…how can anyone now arrive at the actual cut off is a million dollar question…and if at all they are coming with any solution , why people should not go against the decision bcoz it is a total mess now…3 more deleted means those who qualified based on those 3 questions are now in dock..and 2 deleted questions being added means those who got disqualified bcoz of hese have to be in the list..let alone the question of argument on deleted non deleted questions…only God can save this institution called BPSC..may be again a new panel should formed to rectify the anamolies and confusion created by this panel…..
Now matter will be listed on Thursday (17 November), Nothing happened today. thanks
THANKS RATISH FOR YOUR USEFUL INFO!
Court again extended the date of hearing of 53-55 case due to technical reason. Court will again hear the matter on November 17.
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/11/patna-high-court-extends-date-of.html
but wat r the possibility
alots of confusion is coming from bpsc so court should remove the bpsc and create new institution body for clean
examination
only god can save our life
i think bpsc will reduce 5 marks in any case otherwise results will be cancel
Perhaps you are right Kiran, no way…. either reduce 5(min) or 11(max) marks or cancel the result.
Ratish bhai/ Kiran jee,
any information about the pattern of question of mains…… some one said it may be as per UPSC pattern….
Please inform if any changes are to take place
thanks for updating…please keeep us informed about happenings in HC on 17/11/2011.
Thanks
cancel d results after one year…!!there will be another pitition fr tht
result will come with min 5 marks reduce
friends ,please update todays court procidings as soon as possible
wats happening in court plz koi batao..
what is happening in H C…………. any news….?
hearing is scheduled in second half, so please wait till 3 pm
thanks ratishji news update karne ke liye
tum sab ishi tarah aankh lagae raho kuch nahi hone wala hai
did the hearing started
kya kuch ho raha hai hc me plz share
what happens today …………………
all the best 2 all
plz tell me whats happening,exam cancel to naho hoga na,kya possibility hai
ratish jee why ru not answering it has crossed 3pm at least tell us something,plz thoda sa bhi kuch bata do plz
any one plz tell wats happening
hearing is about to start… keep fingers crossed.
sach ki jeet hogi
let truth prevail
jai maa bhawani
jai maa bhawahi
WAIT FOR 28 NOVEMBER. EACH STUDENTS WILL BE AWARDED 9 MARKS.
kaun kaha re bhosrrreeeeeeeeee wala
sorry 28 march 2012
kya kuch idea ho raha hai ki hearing kis aur ja rahi hai matlb 5 marks reduce krne pr,exam cancel karne pr ya agli date milegi plz kuch idea do.
ratish jee is this a confirm news yani ab exam cancel nahi hoga
are tension se matha fat raha… koi to bolo ka hua re baap
plz update
laaanrrrrr seeeeeeee reeeee
Matter adjurned till 28th Nov. extra result is assured. however there is no certainty over how many questions will be deducted.
clear the matter
There is no question of any cancellation. so those who have made it in the first list need not worry.
Would u elaborate what exactly happened since Mr. Ratish has written everyone will get 9 marks so no question of extra result
kya hua bhai log kuchh to btao
sare gand marwane ki tayar ri suru kar do kyonki aab kamane ka koi doosra rasta nahi hai.commission last main isi layak chodti hain,
ANSWERS WILL BE EVALUATED ON 141 QUESTIONS. OBVIOUSLY CUTOFF WILL BE AROUND 101 TO 103. THEN EACH STUDENTS WILL BE AWARDED 9 MARKS. IT MEANS THOSE STUDENTS WHO WILL BE GETTING AFTER FRESH EVALUATION 98 MARKS WILL GET 107 MARKS, AND WILL BE ABOVE CUTOFF. SO PERHAPS THIS IS THE JUDGMENT.
idiotic logic..if cutoff for 141 is between 101-103…then after adding 9 marks each..d new cut off settles at 110-112 marks!! out of bounds..
cutoff will be decided on 141 marks. Your thinking is idiotic. cut off will not be raised my dear. read the judgment.
anybody else..plz confirm d judgement
pillai gaand chudaooooooooooo
well.. inficentre has updated its content…
can tell me anyone what is the final solution of this problem?
what will happen to those who got just cut off marks………
will they loose
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/11/high-court-extends-date-of-bpsc-53-55.html
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/11/bpsc-to-revaluate-answer-sheet-of-53-55.html
if a student get 102 marks as previous marking then what will be for him?
have he any chance to get positive result?
ratish ji plz tell us new cut off
The Patna high court on Thursday directed Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) to spell out how will it award marks for the questions found wrong in the 53rd-55th Combined Common Preliminary Competitive Examination, 2011 and decide the cut-off marks.
A single bench of the court, presided by Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi, directed the BPSC to state how will it proceed in the matter.
BPSC to Revaluate the Answer sheet of 53-55 PT Examination:Admits in Patna High Court.
According to new disclosure commission will evaluate the answer sheet with 141 question out of 150 question asked in examination,nine question has been erased due to error at the same time commission has changed the answer of one question.
http://epaper.livehindustan.com/PUBLICATIONS/HT/HP/2011/11/18/ArticleHtmls/IY%C3%BBM%C3%8AX-FZ-FcLXF-FE-d%C3%80FSZX-%C3%80FZ-IYF-FiIYFdVFF-18112011004033.shtml?Mode=1
BPSC JUDICIAL SERVICES MAINS EXAM FROM 16TH JANUARY.
Can anyone tell me, what are the 5 questions whose answer was wrong in model answer.
vk singh wait for some day
u will be out in evalution of bpsc
because u r not suitable candidate for such types of job
u r eligible for dakaiti or ——–
cut off marks will be reduce 5 marks waits
now involve in bssc exam which is schedule at 18 dec
best of luck
Negative marking ka na hona sari samasyao ka rot cause hai. agar negative marking hota to aisa problem arise nahi hota sayed
kiran hizre bilkul sahi kaha tune.
vk singh matherchod hai sala vk gande nali ka kida bhosdiwala matherchod
NOW BPSC CASE HEARING SHIFTED ON 29 NOVEMBER INSTEAD OF 28 NOVEMBER. SO WAIT FOR TUESDAY.
Do not spread rumors! It is 28 November.
Mr. Ajay it is not rumors. You might have got the answer in the evening.
Ratish you were right.
Mains me yee to pakka hai…
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/11/bihar-to-get-special-staus.html
Now, what is the cut off marks obc girl candidate. please tel me
v k tu apni gaaanddd chat kamine.tu to bahar hi hoga
90+
Hi frauds………whats going on in hc today…. Pls update saalo..
aaj hc me kya hua plz update
At what time hearing is fixed in the HC today? Please update.
Kal Hearing honewala hai
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/11/high-court-extends-date-of-bpsc-53-55.html
yeh bahut dukhad hai ki itney acheey platform per hum sab itni starheen bhsha ka prayog kar rahey hain.vyatigat achep bhi shaleen bhasha ka prayog ker key lagaye jatey hain hope hum sabhi is baat ka dhyaan rakheingein.good luck to all the serious aspirants of bpsc.may god help us all.
Hearing news
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/11/patna-high-court-to-hear-bpsc-53-55-pt.html
aaj hearing second half me hai
when will hearing start plz tell
TODAY IS BIG DAY
did the hearing began ???
Plz update….!
koi to kuch to batao
Ratish ji court me kya chal raha hai?
did the court hearing started?
kya kuch ho raha hai,plz update karo plz plz plz plz………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
kya hearing abhi shuru nahi hui hai?
can anyone
tell us case no so we can also know the status of the case
Next hearing on 1st Dec. 2011…
aaj koi updatation kuon nahi kr raha hai
addition result 15 dec ko de raha ……………….kya
bhai mere kuvh to batao kahin court ne koi galat decision nahi de diya
decision to nahi aya par according to today’s hearing after new evaluation about 1000 passed students are missing and new 600 is finding place. Next hearing on 1 December. Judge will deliver decision only after that. But it seems news is not in favour of unsuccessful students.
we are waiting……………….. please update us as soon as possible…………
Next hearing on 1st December 2011…!
next hearing on 1 December. According to new evaluation of answer sheet 988 missing and 518 new faces is coming. Judge has to decide on this. For unsuccessful students news is not so positive.
Ratishjee U kindly give us information since ur information is always authentic
according to today’s hearing, and new evaluation 915 is missing and 588 is new face is entering. However today no decision was delivered. Next hearing date is 1 December. After that judgment might be delivered. But it seems unsuccessful students is not gaining much.
according to today’s hearing, and new evaluation 915 is missing and 588 is new face is entering. However today no decision was delivered. Next hearing date is 1 December. After that judgment might be delivered. But it seems unsuccessful students is not gaining much.
according to today’s hearing, and new evaluation 915 is missing and 588 is new face is entering. However today no decision was delivered. Next hearing date is 1 December. After that judgment might be delivered. But it seems unsuccessful students is not gaining much.
Neelkamaljee then what is new cut off
on what ground is this based
Ratishjee U kindly give us information since ur information is always authentic
What neelkamal has said is right. He is my friend. It is beyond understandable on which basis BPSC is saying that only 588 new face is entering and 915 is missing on the new evaluation based on new expert panel.
means jinhone mains kaa form bhar diya wo bhi bahar ho jaayenge?????
bpsc has not decleared any cut off.instead they mentioned that after reevalution based on expret report, 915 successful candidates are out of the list and 588 new candidates are entering into the successfull list. on 1 December final hearing and judgment will be out!
However judgment has not delivered. Next hearing is on 1 December. Manan mishra gave the example of jammu kashmir public service commission but judge asked whether he has studied the case. Any way What BPSC has said that it don’t intend to fail those who has passed. So extra result is possible. But don’t know on what basis? Only judge know.
this will be injustice…aur agar aisa hua to fir ek naya case
Dec 1 will be decisive
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/11/exit-threat-looms-over-passed-candidate.html
THANKS RATISH AND NEELKAMAL
Let injustice not to happen…..
we must be united to fight for justice…….. in case it happens….
abhi tak
abhi tak out condidate ke karan delay hua aisa lagta hai aab pass hokar out hone wale condidate ke karan delay hoga………………..
915 KO SAFE KARNE KE LIYE BPSC KAM SE KAM 3 NO. CUT-OFF JRUR KAM KAREGA.
they have to release more result.
it is up to court now BPSC HAS SAID MORE THAN 6000 RESULT IS REQUIRED TO SAVE 915.
Hope for good for Court
new result kaha hai sir dekha jaye 588 new face ..wrong process jiska pahle hua tha bahar karna wrong hai..mistake bpsc kare panalty candidate par why?
Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) whose 53-55 Civil Services examination came under controversy because some errors in the question paper and Model answer key is looking to solve the issue as soon as possible.
Jyada result ana chaheay tavi justice hoga
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/11/exit-threat-looms-over-passed-candidate.html
b.psc 8 marks kam kare aur judiciary ke tarah justice de nahi to sangarsh jari rahega .yadi high court se justice nahi mila to supreme court tak.pass candidate ek bhi nikala gaya to exam can cel ho.
BPSC 8 marks kam kare nahi to SC jane ko ready rahe.
Now 9 marks has to be reduced! Then also there are lot of mistakes. But to close the issue this seems the only possible solution.
it is confirm 5 marks will be reduced
Mr Manan Kumar council of petitioners has said in the HC that BPSC could consider reducing the cut off marks and releasing more result.
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/11/new-twist-in-bpsc-pt-examination-result.html
bhai they are making it so late ,that now they should conduct pre exams again so that there is no more delay and litigations!!its enough late almost eight month and seeing the matter its certain that it will take another one year to solve the case !!please decide !!or take fresh exam!!
result phir se aana chahiye.. copies again check ho NEW Answer key ke according.. new cutoff bane… phir us cutoff se (9+2=11) 11 marks minus kar diye jaye… tab result correct hoga…
jo candidate new result ke according eligible nahi hai vo out kar diye jaye… tabhi justice hoga…
jin candidate ne mains ka form bhar diya hai vo bhi agar new result ke according cutoff ke bahar hain to vo bhi out kar diye jaye..
http://epaper.livehindustan.com/PUBLICATIONS/HT/HP/2011/11/30/ArticleHtmls/FeFeE%C3%80F%C3%80Fe-FeMXe-IZY-dSXFMX-FZ%C3%94-FFF-F%C3%BBOX%C3%9E-30112011002015.shtml?Mode=1
नौ अंक कटे, तो 915 फ़ेल आवेदक होंगे पास
पटना : पटना उच्च न्यायालय में मंगलवार को बिहार लोक सेवा आयोग की 53 वीं से 55 वीं तक की प्रारंभिक प्रतियोगिता परीक्षा में नौ गलत सवालों को लेकर बहस हुई. दोनों पक्षों की बातें सुन कर अदालत ने आयोग को परीक्षा परिणाम रद्द किये जाने के दूसरे विकल्पों के बारे में बताने को कहा.
मामले की अगली सुनवाई एक दिसंबर को होगी. मंगलवार को जब इसकी सुनवाई शुरू हुई, तो बिहार लोक सेवा आयोग के अधिवक्ता ललित किशोर ने अदालत से कहा-एक्सपर्ट कमेटी की अनुशंसा के आधार पर नया कट ऑफ माक्र्स तैयार किया जायेगा, जिसमें एक अंक की कटौती होगी.
जारी रिजल्ट 104 अंकों पर हैं. अब कट ऑफ माक्र्स 103 पर तय होगा. इस आधार पर नये रिजल्ट में फेल हुए 915 उम्मीदवार पास हो जायेंगे और 588 पास उम्मीदवार फेल हो जायेंगे’.
मनन कुमार मिश्र, याचिकाकर्ताओं के अधिवक्ता ने कहा, एक एक्सपर्ट कमेटी की रिपोर्ट आयी तो हजारों लोग बाहर हो रहे हैं. नौ सवाल गलत पाये गये और उन्हें अलग कर दिया गया.
इन सवालों को सही करने का मौका यदि असफल आवेदकों को मिला होता, तो परीक्षा परिणाम बदल जाता’.कोर्ट ने कहा, ‘ एक संभावना यह भी है कि यदि इसे रद्द कर दिया जाये, तो सफल छात्र अदालत पहुंच जायेंगे.
यह मामला लंबा खिंचता जायेगा, जो ठीक नहीं होगा. आयोग अपनी ओर से बताये कि वह क्या रास्ता निकालना चाहती है. इसके बाद समय खत्म हो गया और अदालत ने अगली सुनवाई एक दिसंबर को निर्धारित कर दी.
lets enjoy bpsc drama.
pass hone walo main aisa bhi koe ho sakta hai jinka—
Q1. PATNA INT. airport directly connected.
Q2. what is miniral ?
Q3. reservation for women in local bodies ?
……yai question jo ab cancel ho gaya hai pahle sahi tha aur ab cancel ke karan 3 no. minies kar rha ho ?
AUR JO QUESTION PAHLE CANCEL THA AB SAHI MAAN LIYA GAYA HAI–
Q1. Commercial sources ?
Q2. Rolling plan
…… yeh dono question main bhi unko koe number na aaye to ?
aise main bpsc ko kam se kam 3 no. cut-off kam karna hoga. lekin wah 3 se jada karega.
means to save sucj type of candidates commissin have to reduce the cut off mark by at least 5
Bpsc expert ne jin 2 galat question ko sahi mana hai un ke answer kya hain…?agar kisi ko jankari ho to plz share kare..
1. Rolling plan – ANS (D)
2. COMMERCIAL ENERGY – ANS (A)
Thanks ajay bhai
kudos to bpsc of ‘generating’ hollywood thriller like situation…..
lets suppose a guy with 103 marks . among 3 deleted question he has 2 correct; and among 2 added he has 1 right.
his final score becomes 102…
similarly another guy with 105 marks . he gets (-3) from recent changes .. his score is 102
what is their fate??
good one!
It is quite astonishing that what type of experts does BPSC HAVE ACCESS TO! There was one question pertaining to Commonwealth Games 2010. This question is absolutely wrong. If instead of team events if it would had been mixed events then maybe one of the given options would had been correct. This is one example. Still there are lot of wrong questions, wrong answers etc, etc which can easily be pointed out.
All this can happen in Bihar only. Who are these people who are choosing so called experts! Employees who are paid for their services! Candidates are not beggars. How can they arbitrarily delete questions at their whim? If after appointing experts more than once they cannot resolve the anomalies then they should be punished and penalised! They have make mockery of Constitutional Institution.
They are playing with the fate of the student……..
National deface committee keon delete hua pata nahi….
Patna Airport wala ka v aisa hi haal hai
national defence committee nahi ntional developmental council hona chahiye tha……national dfence commiittee kuch nahi hota hai
patna airport nahi hatana chahiye tha
jpsc revised results out.it is full of anomaly.
passed candidates are out and result has been increased marginally.
Now those who are thrown out will go to court.
JPSC is bullshit.
Now its time for BPSC…
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/12/patna-high-court-to-take-final-call-in.html
Friends…………
when will hearing start…………
what is going on there……. any latest news?
sir koi batae kya news hai bpsc ka
HEARING IS IN SECOND HALF
Kya ho raha hai bhai log hc me
MOST PROBABLY EXAM WILL BE CANCEL EITHER TODAY BY HC OR AFTER TWO MONTH BY SC.
Thanks RATISH !
ratish jee wat r the possibility?
I think as soon as possible without taking much time of unemployed youth, honourable court should give the verdict. Possibly BPSC should give more than 6000 new results so all should get chance to write mains. Public system has made mockery of …………………………..
plz koi batao ki kya ho raha hai,kya hearing shuru ho gayi,plz inform us
KYA HO RAHA HAI…….
plz update with current court procedure
Plz update…..lagta hai match ka faisla last over ke last ball par hoga…
perhaps 3 cutoff will be lowered according to court.
mayperhaps 7 coutoff will be lowered
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/12/patna-high-court-completes-hearing-of.html
No judgment delivered. But during the discussion, to pass, failed students, 3 cutoff lowering was the intention. However manan mishra insisted to lower 9 marks and said that he might move supreme court if it is not accepted. On this statement Judge became furious and said that you can go anywhere where you want. Judgement reserved.
Thanks Ratish
Ratis bhai
can u please say …. when will court give final judgement.
Trying to get more information, then I will say in details. thanks
Verdict is reserved .But can we guess the time when it will be made published?Please if any one can add in this.
BPSC said that it can release 7800 more result.
ab aap 3 no. cut-off kam karne ko razi hue hai to wah 915 ko save karne ke liye aur sath mainjo aa jaye. lekin unka kya jinhone court main itna lamba case Lda ?
ab aap 3 no. cut-off kam karne ko razi hue hai to wah 915 ko save karne ke liye aur sath main jo aa jaye. lekin unka kya jinhone court main itna lamba case Lda ?
that was the main discussion point.
judgment on 6 December.
will they declare something? or its again same repeatation
sorry, perhaps it is judgement. 7809 more result will be published. cutoff 99-100.
Condiadte who is not quqlified with 2 marks as per this result. How many possibility reflects for qualifying after reduction of cut off marks from 3 marks. Any one please convey me.
thank ratish pls update
whats about your previous statement
It was the roller coaster hearing in Patna High court after hearing the writ petition of 53-55 PT examination result court has kept their verdict reserved.
During the hearing of the matter petitioner’s council Manan kumar was pushing for reduction of Cut off by 9 mark’s as it was done with Judiciary Examination but court was not looking to convince.
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/12/patna-high-court-completes-hearing-of.html
ranjeet ji what will be cut off marks it is right 99 or 100
http://ibnlive.in.com/generalnewsfeed/news/hc-reserves-order-on-bpsc-preliminary-examination-results/921096.html
it seems to be more reliable story… courtest PTI.
Amazing BPSC ,amazing commitee ,amazing 8 questions ,amazing 9 questions …….
बिहार लोक सेवा आयोग (बीपीएससी) की 53 से 55वीं प्रारंभिक परीक्षा के विवाद मामले में पटना उच्च न्यायालय ने सुनवाई पूरी कर ली। न्यायमूर्ति अजय कुमार त्रिपाठी इस मामले में अपना आदेश बाद में पारित करेंगे। याचिकाकर्ता की तरफ से वरीय अधिवक्ता मनन कुमार मिश्र ने कहा कि लिखित परीक्षा के लिए पास नहीं करने वाले अभ्यर्थियों के अंक में नौ विवादित प्रश्नों के नौ नंबर जोड़ दिये जायें और कट ऑफ वही रखा जाये। फिर रिजल्ट निकालकर लिखित परीक्षा के लिए फार्म भराया जाये। ऐसा पहले से होता आया है एवं सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने भी अपनी सहमति जतायी है। बीपीएससी की तरफ से अपर महाधिवक्ता ललित किशोर ने कहा कि सब के साथ समान व्यवहार होना चाहिए। वह नौ नंबर कम कर फिर से मूल्यांकन करता है तो 915 अभ्यर्थी बाहर हो जाएंगे। वह पहले से पास किसी अभ्यर्थी को फिर से मूल्यांकन कर फेल नहीं करना चाहता है। वेहतर होगा कि पहले से पास 15 हजार अभ्यर्थियों के साथ आठ हजार फेल अभ्यर्थियों को जोड़ दिया जाये और कुल 22 हजार अभ्यर्थियों को लिखित परीक्षा में बैठाया जाये। वहीं अधिवक्ता अभिनव श्रीवास्तव ने कहा कि नौ प्रश्नों को हटाकर फिर से मूल्यांकन करवाया जाये एवं नये सिरे से रिजल्ट निकाला जाये।
Ratish bhai….
Is there any fixed date on which high court will give their final judgement… Please reply.
What a mockery! How shameful is the status of a constitutional body i.e. BPSC?
When a candidate enters examination hall he does not enters with the intention to correct his question setters. He/She is himself/herself tensed.
Instruction clearly states in case you feel (not scrutinize) that there are more than one correct response, mark the response which you consider the best. If there is any sort of mistake either of printing or of factual nature, then out of English and Hindi versions of the questions, the English version will be treated as standard.
Now people who need not be an expert scrutinize total questions he can easily conclude within a day that these anomalies are there:
According to Question Booklet Series D:
10) Till 2010….
B) will be the best response (logic; for entire 2010).
30) If instead of team events it would have been mixed events then one of
the given options would have been correct. This is wrong question thus needs to be deleted.
59) Ideally best answer will be (B) land. (Logic source is asked not transporting agent thus land run-offs)
71) Best response will be (B). nb: year is of no concern for the candidate.
79) Very interesting question. English version mentions National Defence Committee whereas hindi version mentions National Security Committee. But as English version should prevail best response will be (C)
83) (A) is the best response.
84) Wrong question so needs to be deleted.
89) Wrong question so needs to be deleted.
93) (D) is the best response.
95) Given the options (A) is the best response. (If one argues then it can easily be said that direct connection can be established via…..)
96) Very tricky and interesting question. In Bihar, air services….Given the choices (A) is the best response. (B) cannot be as taken over by another private airline. Further in Hindi version nimnlikhit ke is mentioned whichn proves beyond doubt that (A) will be the best response.
102) Wrong question so needs to be deleted.
143) (A) will be the best response. It is not asked which soil will be best for cultivation.
144) (B) has to be the best response. Here it is to be noted that if silty soil was not there then it would have been loamy soil.
149) The best response will be (D). Here the question does not ask for only human being, if argued.).
My dear friends and fellow aspirants this is not emotional outburst but logical conclusion.
How long candidates will suffer?
We suffered in the 48 to 52nd BPSC pt. So called experts, intellectuals and judges abruptly came to a decision and conducted the mains.
Pt. is though a rejection process but not for the sake of rejection meritorious candidates should suffer year after year.
In judiciary examination 25 marks are reduced but it is the best judgment. It is not a question of quantity but not a single candidate should suffer. Supreme Court also approved it.
I think in this 53rd to 55 BPSC pt examination cut-off must be reduced by at least 15 marks otherwise these so called experts will take 2 years to detect total anomalies.
High court 5 marks kam karega .mamla sc jayega aur exam cancel hoga . Exam bachana hai to 9 marks cutt off kam karna hoga according to recent judiciary case . Ab dekhna hai bpsc abhi 9 marks kam karti hai ya judiciary case ki tarah student ka 4 month barbad karne ke bad. expert mahoday to samasya suljhane ke bajaye uljhane me expert nikle.
relax ajay
then all 1 lac 60 thousands should write mains,
really,bpsc is creating unnecessary issue of pt result. they have to declear 10% of result of the number of candidates have appeared in exam.they should have publised the key answer before declearing the result ,just like uppsc and some other pscs. upsc,haryana pcs ,rajasthan pcs, etc. donot publish answer keys,thus,avoiding unnecessary drama.this help them in conducting examination on a time frame. in bihar,candidates are emotionally demanding more results,because of many reasons. already number of seats are a few .i.e about 300 seats.this means that only 2% will be making out finally. if more candidates appears ,then it will reach 1%. so,what is purpose of taking pt exam? every one should had been allowed for mains without any pt exam.till now we could had final result.no wastage of time and money.
saving of 900 candidates is not justified and publising of more about 8000 result is also justified.in competition exam ,only fit survives.just filling of mains form ,is not a strong ground for 900 candidates for sittting for mains exam. even after appointment , one can be thrown out in services
let judge do ,proper justice,otherwise their will be nexus between bpsc,judge,coaching centres,and greedy or powerful candidates to get a post through other than merit.
jai bpsc, jai bihar high court ,jai bihar ias/pcs coaching ,, jai candidates,jai bihar
read publising of more about 8000 result is also not justified
Justice Lalit has Given the Judgement…..
Sorry …Kidding…
Don’t Mind Pllz
Trying for lighter moment forgive me …Lalit Ji…
It is really a pathetic condition. Last BPSC i could not qualify just by 1 mark and in that exam 13 questions was deleted. No doubt Bihar is a state which had great persons like Chanakya, Aryabhat, Varahmihr who were renowned for their intelligence worldwide but today the conditions what we have……….our experts can not frame 150 questions for which students are in big mental and moral torture. Perhaps for this, corruption and castism are more responsible ……..anyone with political or money power get into government service and become so called question setters.
Another thing what I feel in educational or job related cases, judgement should be quick seeing age of students and years of service. Now how here we can relate with the verdict given in case of Judicial exam, knowing difference in the number of students appearing in BPSC civil services and judicial exam, Why people are not asking to relate with the last BPSC 48-52 exam? One thing should be clear, there should not be place for sympathy. If 9 marks is deducted then it is from all the students not only who failed, so how a genuine person can ask for adding 9 marks to those who failed, I dont understand logic………..You know if a person fails in all walks of life then that person decidde to become either…………………..or………………………………, both the jobs are very important for a country since one is considered as nation builder and other is guardian of………………demand highly qualified persons but…………condition is different
You are forgetting basic thing. If candidates suffered during 48-52 BPSC pt exam. why they should suffer in 53-55th exam.They waited for more than 3 years just to suffer again. Even after Judiciary exam they cannot set correct questions!Passed candidate is also suffering due to delay.
Marks are reduced to restore parity. Simple logic, suppose a candidate who has passed. wrongly attempts all 9 deleted questions and a failed candidate attempts all 9 questions correctly, then… (assuming 9 questions were correct). Give it a thought.This is only one of many consequences.
Come on. there are still anomalies!
It is quite obvious that one who is falling short by 10 marks does not make it.
judgement will come on thrusday friends.
threat of cancellation loomslarge
read thursday
kaha hi sabhi dosto
judgment out?
judgment aayaa?
when will decision come today
kab desigion aayega 2012 me hi lagta hai hoga…
hc ka decision aaj hi ayega na?
aaj court band hai…….
today is muslim festival, may be court holiday
PATNA HIGH COURT HOLIDAYS.
http://patnahighcourt.bih.nic.in/PHC-Cal-2011.pdf
KHUSHI MANAO KAMINO KUCH HASIL NAHI HONE WALA HAI GO TO HELL.
kya v k aapki maa yahi sikhai hai language
please do not abuse here yaar.
this is not a street show u r acting in
Hi VK jee,
For ur kind information, I also work in same capacity as of ur’s.(may be different dept. of central govt.)…….. and didnot find myself in successful list of condidates in PT by 2 marks( It is proved after seeing the 8 deleted questions and subsequently new expert panel suggested options for all 11 questions) . I am sure it is becouse of BPSC’s foult…..
So in any way you better accuse BPSC for delay or any injustice to you…. rather ur colleague of future…. In case u go through to become an officer in Bihar Govt.
Your potential must not be wasted in abusing students of same path …….. It’s my view…. u r free to choose ur way…
I think u may abuse me also…… but in my view you have proved once that ur’s is man of potential by becoming an officer….Please don’t reverse that.
Best Wishes…..
I agree with Mr. A.K.Singh we should use abusive language……………But I have a question to all……Even after exam we were knowing there were at least five questions which were wrong,BPSC to conduct fresh exam… It is unfortunate but I have to say today students are most opportunistic and corrupt……….where country will head |God knows……………See I also could not qualify the examination but this is unfortunate that failed persons going to the Court and pleading for sympathy…….pls lower 9 marks …….15 marks………..lets give a chance to Bihar to again reoccupy its lost status not only in INDIA but also in world………..I feel intelligentsia of Bihar is using this particular forum so dont give bad impression of developing Bihar. Lastly the Court should make those passed as well as failedd students free of mental trauma as soon as possible…………this age should be the age of quick and reliable judgement. Jai Bihar…..Jai Bharat
Sorry if I hurted anyone.
sorry it is should not use abusive language
SAGAR,its not about sympathising with students on either side of the cut off.
its rather about justice to those who sufferred due to arbitrariness of esteemed commission.
HAD it not been the case how come bpsc experts deleted 9 questions instead of earlier 8.
now anyone suggesting sympathy is derailing the debate about redressal.
well said sir.real thing is there should b no harm to students.and every one must b given a chance to fight on equal platform.and court should weigh all the possibilities so that there is no injustice with any one.
high court ke decision ka kya hua… any news
aj hearing hogi ya nahi…???
Dear Sagar,
You are right up to the extent that Students have to be opportunistic, but how can they be said corrupt….
Actually corrupt is the existing system which is also taking too much time…..without bothering about students future.
My view is….. deliver verdict as soon as possible… and Asking to rectify mistakes of authorities is not begging, it is also not asking for sympathy… It is in fact our right to stand for justice.
And see! BPSC has also admitted their mistakes by now deleting 9 questions. So let them rectify it. My only plea is to do it fast…. take least time in the interest of all candidates either successful or unsuccessful.
Best wishes……
HI VIKAS JEE I RESPECT ALL OF U BUT WHAT A SITUATION AFTER 1 YEAR WE DONT KNOW WHEN WILL BE EXAM HELD THIS IS TYPE OF THE BAD SITUATION CREATED BY FAILED STUDENTS . IF I WAS NOT IN LIST OF PASSED STUDENT IT MAY BE I WITH U . THIS IS THE HUMAN NATURE. HO SAKTA HAI MAINE KISI KO HEART KIYA HO MAY BE BY MY STATEMENT. LEKIN YE BHI TO THIK NAHI HAI KI HUM ISHE 5 YAER PLAN BANA DE. CASE FILE HAR BAAR HOTA HAI KYA YE NAHI LAGTA HAI KI YE FASHION BAN CHUKA HAI.
kya aaj hc ki hearing hai,will decision come today?
good news in the offing,friends
hello Ratish jee and all respected people….. is it true that 7809 result is coming ? if yes then when the judgement will be delievered..please tell me that exact how many marks will be reduced..actually i have 103 and currently in a DOLDRUM situation..please reply soon thanks
justice tripathi aa gaye hai.bpsc counsel absent hai.manan mishra aa gaye hai
justice ki baat karne walo jinka pt ho gaya hai aur marks 104 ya 105 hai ..agar wo candidate 101+walo ka result ka agar aginest me hai to unse besharam koi nahi soch ke dekhe”’gali dena easy hai kyoki kutto ka bhokna aur gali dena i think dono equal hai”’
jai santoshi ma
me v.k. singh pagal ho gaya ho mujhe maaf kar de”
kya aaj bpsc ka faisla ayega
Ratish bhai/ Neelkamal jee
kya aaj final judgement ane wala hai…..
please confirm the rumor.
doston mujhe bhi batao kya aaj decision ayega
what hapened to day please post informations
PERHAPS JUDGEMENT WILL BE DELIVERED tomorrow.
why
Today, BPSC case was not in the cause list.
ratish jee plz tell me what are the possibilities plz
how many marks will be decreased..plz inform
Honourable Judge had already given consent to bpsc’s proposal on last hearing on 1 December. Only written judgement has to be read. Accordingly 7809 additional result might be declared after the written judgment. Those who are getting less than 3 to 4 marks from the cutoff in each category, might come in that additional list. Exam is not going to be canceled. Lowering 9 cutoff is a very blink chance. But above all, nobody know the judge’s mind. It only be known after the real Judgement.
thanks a lot friend
ratish bhai pls clear 3 or 4
THANKS RATISH BHAI PLEASE ALSO POST ABOUT FINAL JUDGEMENT ,WHEN IT GOING TO BE FINAL TOMORROW OR SOME OTHER DAY.
friend when will the decision come today
Ratish has been giving reliable and authantic information as per record.We must salute such good personality.
Mr. Santosh Kr. Singh, koi kisi ka virodh nahi kar raha hai mein to bolta hoon sabhi ka mains le lo taki mein bhi likh pawoon, but Guru Santosh kya kabhi tumari train ek second se chuta hai, kya aap ek mark se IAS mains nahi qualify kar paye……….kya tumaraha 1 mark se matric mein 2nd division chuta hai (kyonki aap 3 rd div ke hi layek hein)……… It is BPSC even half mark matters……………. stop talking nonsense or using abusive language
yes mr. sagar mera bpsc 1 no se chuta hai 103 marks roll 138222
all the best sagar ji
me 2 in same zone
RATISH BHAI / NEELKAMAL JEE & FRIENDS….
We are very thankful to you for updating us with authenticity.
Please update about final judgement and consequences afterwards….
This is a journey where many are together even being at faraway places….
Be in touch through this medium and share the Knowledge and Information.
God bless us…..
Best wishes………..
Judgment chance is quite high today..
Keep your finger Crossed
hope for the best
gadhon kamino khushi manao
saath dene ke liye thanks
bhai VK phir se gali dena suru kiya… ek bar sorry then phir se suru…
shayad kisi ne thik hi kaha hai kutte ka dum kabhi sidha nahi ho sakta…
anyway concentrate on judgement today as we all are waiting…
bhai VK phir se gali dena suru kiya… ek bar sorry then phir se suru…
shayad kisi ne thik hi kaha hai kutte ka dum kabhi sidha nahi ho sakta…
anyway concentrate on judgement today as we all are waiting…
when is the hearing time
Ratish ji kuch to update kijeye….bachon ki jaan lenge kya…
Vk kuta, gadhha pagal ho gaya kya Ek pt ka result ke baad?
EVEN TODAY BPSC CASE IS NOT IN THE CAUSE LIST. SORRY FRIENDS
what is the date of hearing..
If you got 103 marks then u r not fit to write mains as the case with me……I am very clearly saying i also got 103 but not making noise since I know those who qualified are better than me though may be in this exam…….whatever either by luck or knowledge……….I really appreciate successful candidates and admit I was not good enough to qualify this exam……..so i ll try in next exam……….but because of you people I dont know when that chance will come
mera roll no note kar lo agar result aaya to dekh lena ..good by mr. sagar comment karne ka jarrori nahi tum kya ho tum jante ho aur me kya ho apna apna dekhna hai ..
what is the date of hearing..
you are totally made. jo is thra apas me kr raho ho
What I am? I just passed this year my graduation and preparing for civil services at Mukherjee Nagar at Interaction, and I said i am now not of upto mark therefore I could not qualify by i mark or by 90 marks………..I know you got angry but could you realise how much mental torture successful candidates must be undergoing …………and for what…….. for to be better than us………….See gentlemam I am not doubting or questioning ur knowledge or capacity but If we were so honest then could not have waited for result but by 25th April itself could have gone court and could have requested for reexamination. Mujhe ye bhi maloom hai ki aap DYSP bhi ban saktein hein……….Par bhaiya hum sirf itna kah rahein hein ki we are doing injustice with successful candidates……..I am with them since in next examI may be in their side…………I feel Justice delayed is justice denied…………. Santosh bhaiya gussa mat ho jaiye mein apse maafi chata hoon yedi maine apko dukh pahunchaya hai………apka optionals kya hai
court kab faisla sunaya ga
wait 15th Dec
means, kya faisala 15 dec ko aayga ?
doston ,anyay key prati sangharsh karna awashyak hai.baat 1 number ya do number sey miss karney ki nahin.agey key liye aur any pariksharthiyon ko anyaay ka samna nahin karna padey is key liyey jo log bhi sangharshrat hain unki prashansha ki jani chahiyey..keval yeh cutt off kam karney ki ladayi key roop me nahin dekhna chahiyey kyonki agey mains aur interview ki bhi ladai ladni pad sakti hai.sangharsh karney waley sabhi sathiyon ko dhanyawaad.aur bpsc ko bhavishya mein 150 prashn bhut sonch samajh key chunney padengey .isssey sabhi ko fayda hoga.aur kisi ko koi anyay nahin sahna padega.
are bhai mein kab sangarsh karne se mana kar raha hoon………..par sangarsh karne ke liye 3 month ka intzar kyon kiye…….humsabko maloom tha kuch questions galat hein to us samay hi sangarsh start karna tha…………abhi to becharon jinka huwa hai unka mar rahe ho aur kyon nahi mante jinka hua hai wo humlogon se accha perform us do ghante mein kiya……………..dont talk big big thing first see urself……..sangarsh …………teaching a lesson to BPSC……… u people are just trying to justify urself……..You just answer my two questions………………1. why not you gone the Court just after PT exam…………..2, whether if u could have qualified PT exam then could u have talked as u are talking now………………
sagar ji galti sey mainey pt bahut achey ankon sey paas kiya hai.still m with guys who are fighting for justice.
I have qualified pt. but then also I can say that the Commission is totally at fault! Candidates should not suffer year after year. Why they are setting wrong questions exam after exam? No one wants to waste time in filing court cases! By the way before these writs were filed there were 8 questions deleted! now 9! These people can do whatever they want, arbitrarily. By the way main was supposed to be held in September. Who is responsible for the delay? Please go through the judgment concerning Judiciary exam. Is not it that based on that judgment they should have reduced 8 marks and conducted the mains. They are more at fault now. After taking more than 2 months they have come to conclusion that there are 9 wrong questions.Now court should reprimand these people and give them some good dose! We are not afraid to appear mains with more candidates! If not taught a lesson this arbitrariness will be there in mains and subsequently interview and overall recruitment will be mockery!These people cannot correct more papers in mains!
They have created a whole mess. If the judgment is not proper there will be more delay and those who have got chance to appear in mains will suffer. Yaar! bahut ho gaya. 90 MARKS SE JYADA JISNE KIYA HAI WOH COMPETE KARNE KE KABIL HAI! Kam se kam in experts se toh jyada kabil hai! Do chance milne ke baad bhi galtiyon pe galtiyan!
Yaar jaldi se solution pe aaoo! Kab tak blog pe aakar hum fizul baaton pe bahas karen!
well said……….very well said
Dear Ajay,
Completely agree with u.
Stop fighting and press for solution.
Best wishes…..
I condemn those who are using abusive language. We all to understand that after all the country is in democracy and free to air his or her opinion irrespective of difference. For this reason some people are away from air to opinion in this forum. Once Mr. Lohia said to a journlist that he knew that you(journalist) had lying but not oppose u. please do respect to other differ opinion.
For the sake of Bihar, BPSC, Aspirant, and all , exam should squarely cancelled. No other option has been left.
I feel Mr. Ajay saheb should go for LLB degree then prepare for judiciary exam, so that judgement can be delivered not based on facts and figures but based on sympathy. I support you when you say commission is wrong but I feel pitty when you say whoever got above 90 should be allowed to write mains. And I bet Mr. Ajay you have not qualified PT.
Prepare well and write sachiwalay sahayak exam
Dear Sagar,
I know it better how does it feel when civil cervices is missed by very few marks (finally.)
going by information about you, told by urself on this site your aim and dream is for bigger cause.
concentrate to be ur best for PT of IAS. and I wish u become an exceptional officer.
donot come in confrontation with someone… at least not personally (for mistakes of institutions.) because everybody has their point of view and some element is definitely there.
You r like younger brother to me ….. that’s why trying to give u a peace of advice.
I lost my ambition of becoming a civil servant, I wish you get it.
Best wishes….
kamino halla kyon kar rahe ho
Sorry Alok bhaiya but it is not personnel attack. I just wondered how a would be commissioned officer can say above 90 should write Mains. Commission is at fault for both successful as well as for unsuccessful.then because of fault of BPSC why should those students suffer…possibly they are busy preparing mains otherwise they also could have written………..If really ur intension is correct i.e., to get system corrected then lets us go and talk to CM,Bihar. I am again saying very plainly why not gone the court just after PT exam……..other thing why you want comparison with Judicial result ( no. of applicants are less) why not with earlier BPSC exam, why not with J&K commission…………It shows intension…………..
I have some sincere questions to all of you…….If you really want justice for all the students then why don’t you report malpractices at the exam centre………Ever we have thought why such a high cut off……..possible reason is rampant copying………..why don’t we ask the govt to take care of this practice………If something gone wrong then why don’t we go immediately and get it corrected why we wait so long………..we have seen how people copy during exam…………that is really a pathetic condition and harming genuine students………….why dont you make a cry against this system……………
Alok bhaiya though I am preparing for civil services but it is not that there is no life without it (this is what Shashank Atom says). I feel exam should be cancelled so that all will have fair chance to qualify……….Bhaiya could you suggest me optional subjects (take short duration for preparation) for BPSC since if 3 marks is reduced then I will be writing mains and I dont have any preparation. Plssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss you suggest me. With regards. Ajayjee I was just kidding I am also the passenger of same boat…so pls dont mind
Ratishjee could you pls tell us when will be mains exam…………what is total no. of vacancies especially for SDM and DySP. Pls Ratishjee prakash daliye charo taraf andhkar hi andhkar hai…………
According to BPSC there are about 680 seats but without SDM.
http://patnahighcourt.bih.nic.in/PHC-Cal-2011.pdf
Where is justice….
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/12/patna-hc-keeps-guessing-student-in-53.html
JPSC revised marksheet full of faults.
Check website
LEVE ASIDE THIS DISCUSSION FOR NOW.JUST LET ME KNOW THE CHANCES OF NEXT PRE AND ITS TIMING ?
ratish what will be cut off of obc, gen
hello, ratish i m sanjay from delhi at mukherjee nagar. my marks is 102 after bpsc new evolution. what my chance for coming addt result. last year i faced upsc interview but i was not upsc final list. when was bpsc pt i m busy my interview then i could not give best for bpsc pt .my attempt is over for upsc. my age 31year. i have no option without bpsc so plz guide me.what chance for bpsc mains
you will be in the list.
thanks, ratish
Now I think exam should be cancelled and a very tough question paper should be set by Americans…………..since here we have so called expert minus knowledge
RESULT SWARN AKSHAR SE BPSC LAGTA HAI TAIYAR KAR RAHA HAI JIS SE TIME LAG RAHA HAI CHINA KO GOLD SUPPLY KA ORDER DE DIYA HAI SUPPLY HOTE HI RESULT AAYEGA….
result 31 st jan,2011 tak niklega v k bola hai
Suna hai Justice Tripathy pahle BPSC ke councel hua karte the.. yadi is baat me dam hai to chinta ki baat hai. Decision kaisa hoga anuman lagaya ja sakta hai.. lekin BPSC ko sabak sikhane ke liye kuch karo bhai……..
Judge sahab chutti pe hai jab ayenge tab decision ayega
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/12/applicants-of-bpsc-is-still-waiting-as.html
Mishrajee apne shaadi kar li hai kya aap kanha ke rahne wale hein
judgement 15 january 2012 ke bad aayega
judgemen aaj aaayegaaa.
http://patnahighcourt.bih.nic.in/constitution2.pdf
DOSTO JUSTICE TRIPATHI BENCH ME AAAJ HAI.2ND HALF ME ORDER AAANE WALA HAI
BLOG PE GALAT INFORMATION HAI
CHECK THE LINK;
http://patnahighcourt.bih.nic.in/constitution2.pdf
jai ho judge sahab ki lotiya dooba gaye..
jai santoshi maa
RATISH JI WHERE R U
PLS SHARE INFORMATION
ratish jee tumhare godfather hain kya….wait yaar
I DON’T HAVE GODFATHER, BUT MYSELF IS FATHER. YOU MIGHT HAVE GOT THE ANSWER. KEEP GUESSING.
I somewhat agree with Ajay; for the justice to prevail in this stinking situation, way forward is either to have a re-exam by BPSC under the guidance of the High Court (as BPSC has long lost the credibility of credible deliverance) or to have the cut-off down by 15 marks. Though it is doubtable that PHC present single bench would take such decision; let’s see. But it is clear if the verdict doesnt go in either of the two direction, then it might move to SC. That again would be harsh on the successful candidate.
Mr. Sandeep U dont talk nonsense about a genuine person…………..Ratishjee has never given any incorrect information
gagar me sagar
absolutely correct, he has given correct informtion and we should be thankful to him.
yes thats very tru..ratish has been true with his information..and there is no cause to have him in disrespect
Har nahi manunga, rar nahi thanunga, Kal ke kapal par likhta, mitata hun, Geet naya gata hun, geet naya gata hun.
ratish jee dont care about baseless statement…even some statements are dont deserve to comment…we are really thankful to you..
correct, he has given correct informtion and we should be thankful to him
See how these organization is working ..A total waste of public money and students time
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/12/jpsc-is-spv-of-corruption-for-jharkhand.html
dear ratish ji….is there any chance of pronouncement of judgement today….someone was telling that 15th is the date…pls update
Ratish ji….kya aaj hum log court se kuch ummid rakh sakte hain….plz update..
Does every state PSC is an epitome of corruption , neptoism and favourism ??
do u have any doubts friend .hahaha.miserable .psc’s are synonym to what u mentioned.
MY friend just look the condition of JPSC,all post looted by GOVT,beaurucrates,politician and official of jpsc.Gopal singh ki jagir thi JPSC aur sabhi post apne rishtedaro ,dosto yaha tak naukro ko de diya.
kaun sa govt department sahi hai sab kha pikar mast hai, teacher ko padhana nahi ata par 50000 se ek lakh kama raha haai quesstion setter ko question set karna nahi ata par st kar raha hai…. corruption to office office ki kahani hai……………..tu america se aya hai kya jo aise baikuf ke tarah sawal puchata hai tu to BPSC pas kar gaya to sare system ko hi duba dega
judgement kab ayega??? kya kisi ko date pta h judgement ki…
Honourable Justice Mr. Tripathi has once again joined the court. Hope judgement will be delivered next week before court holidays. Thanks
thanks ratish bhai please please please keep it up
next hearing kab hogi…??
ajay bhai judgment kab aaeegaaa.
blog slow hai
When 56 BPSC? I have to prepare for next PT. This exam is going to be cancelled so start preparing for PT
yess sagar u plzz start preparing
ratish what is update now pls share
What about you Mr. Avinash, if you will not start preparing now then again u need to go the court, so plsssssssssssss u also start
sagar if u hav already qualified in pt then y u not keeping patience till d courts verdict.u r misleading those sincere candidates who hav started preparing fr mains….wat a foolish person u r!…!
friends, share ur views on bssc pt exam.what can be cut off ?not a easy exam.,as people had expected.
bpsc mains kab hoga?bpsc pt exam ka result becoming mockery. wasting ones time.are 15000 results not enough.
see uppsc,they conducted mains recently,they also give wrong answers.
cool lalit
Yeah Mr. Lalit you are correct, just killing time, Avinashjee hamse bade flower to aap hein jo bekar mein mains ki tairi kar rahein hein, kyonki naye result kuch 14500 ane wala hai na ki 20000 just wait then you can find out who is foolish
You know in coming days conduction of exam will become difficult they should press for stoppage of corruption but for that sincerity is required but here case is different. Here some people with money playing with the fate of 15000 candidates.
avinaash dear i m preparing fr mains coz i hav already qualified in pt wth marks far above cutoff line,nw if anyone suggests me to prepare fr pt b4 d courts verdict,den definetly goin to call him a fool.
Har dal pe ULLU baitha hai………..!!!!!!!!!!!
bihar ssc mein general ka cut off around 85 hona chahiye
Ok you tell me ur optional and suggest me two scoring optionals plssssssssssssss Avinash
Avinashjee apko kya lagta hai aap mains ko phod dijiyega kyonki pt to koi bhi paas ho sakta hai aur aap itna akad dikha rahein hein
just scroll bck to all my post, n ask ne sensible person ke maine kab akad dekhaya.mera to ye ist attempt hai magar aapki baat mujhe galat lagi to maine react kiya..
decision will come tomorrow
@Rishi, On what basis are you sticking to 85 cut off for Bihar S.S.C. ?
bssc cut off likely will go high
For gen. Category it would be around 105, only due to 75 questions were on maths+rsng based. So 70% would be cutoff marks, if result came 1550×5 then cutoff would be108.
its my view rakesh…im not sure.i may b wrong..plz give ur view
Any update on high court decision today?
In my view,the cut-off for Bihar S.S.C. should be 55-60% (for Gen.).The reason for low cut-off are~ (1) -ve marking. (2) Reasoning questions were a bit difficult and time-conruming.(3)
In my view too,the cut-off for Bihar S.S.C. should be 55-60% (for Gen.).The reason for low cut-off are~ (1) -ve marking. (2) Reasoning questions were a bit difficult and time-consuming.(3) No. of candidates selected for mains would be around 10000.(4) It being the 1st examination,no one had any,idea about the pattern of quetions…
RATISH BHAI,
What about final high court verdict…? is it comming soon….?
judgement february me aaeegaa.
It would come by next year………..mains will start from 18 january till 4th february. Hindi and Eng…18
GS I and II…….19, History………20………..LSW…….21………..Sociology….22………Pub Ad…..23…….Anthropology…..24…………Pol Science………25…………..then on 27. All the best prepare hard without wasting ur precious time……….
ye kya hai sagar bhai? heart attack karaoge kya is mausam mein?
sagar kaun se university se pass kiye ho lagta hai lalu k time fake degree liye ho bpsc k mains exam me english paper nhi hota hai wrong news mat do ye tumhari wrong attitude ko display karti hai bpsc upsc chod ssc constable ki taiyari kro khi mauka nikal na jaye
nahi bhai, ab prepare hona start ho jayiye nahi to piche se anewale log baji mar jayenge
@rakesh,u are right.people did not expected this type of format in pt exam,it was surprise like a cat exam. they even not kept to their word of maticulation standard of maths. .since they have not given question paper,so it i not easier to give a pin point cut off.100+ is safe in this exam. rest wil depend on others performances.
from which book they have asked reasoning and maths questions.do any one one remember tricklish question of gs and science? then share.
sager,donot fool others.every serious person knows that january is bpsc juducairy examination.
Phir se chale jao court kyonki maths matric level ka nahi aya………….kab ja rahe ho court jana hai to abhi hi chale jao bad mein nahi selection hone par mat jana……….kyonki tumlogon ka samay ka mahatav to hai nahi jinka hai unhe torture bad mein mat karna……………..aap mein se jo bhi court jana chatein hein abhi chale jaiye mahan atma log…………..bad mein ye kahte hue mahan man baniyega ki inko sabak sikhana hai………..pahle khud to sabak sikh lo
kyun itna smart ban rahe ho sagar bhai? tayari karo bakbaas nai. kisi aur guru gyaan mat baato.
sagar hw com u knw abt mains date b4 verdict?
Sab choor hai…
Tripathi Bhi
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/12/delaying-in-high-court-verdict-creas.html
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/12/bihar-ssc-sachivalay-sahayak-pt-cut-off.html
cut off will be around 90 because anybody who has attempted 120 will get 95 to 97 correct answer.thus his effective score will be around 90.if some one has attempted more than 130, his correct answer will come down below 90. this is my own experience.some may not be agreed with me but to me it seems true!
@Neelkamal, How can anyone say who has attemted how many questions in B.S.S.C. exam.?Total no. of attemted questions might vary widely from person to person.
where is ratish bhai? please come out and share ur authentic information.we are requesting u please come out and write something about pt result verdict.
ratish bhai wait kar rahen hain…..
Many of the G.S. questions of Bihar S.S.C. have been directly COPIED from G.S. Paper of I.A.S.(PT) Exam. 2006.
Unsuccessful candidates will be given 9 marks.Cut-off general 103 and same for other categories. Mains in March
yes you are right. At least 17 questions were asked from upsc GS (pt) 2006.
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/12/bihar-ssc-sachivalay-sahayak-pt-result.html
There is one famous saying ” Dhaan ke khet puaale se chinha jaala “. BPSC’s so called new experts have deleted the question Minerals are (A) liquids (B) inorganic solids (C) gases (D) All of the above. Anyone knows that Minerals are inorganic solids. Why they deleted this question? Being rebuked by the Court this is the level of experts appointed by BPSC. What will happen in mains ? These shameless fellows should immediately reduce the cut-off by 9 marks. Simple logic, to shave nearly thousand candidates they are eager to reduce cut-off by 3 why not to face further humiliation in future they are reducing it by 9 marks. Anyhow after mains candidates will be using RTI to test the quality of these so called experts.Then at least they will get sometime to prepare themselves!
aapne thik se padhai nahi ki hai…for kind information minerals having both organic and inorganic character …DO YOU KNOW PETROLEUM , COAL…WHICH ARE MINERALS HAVING ORGANIC CHARACTER…..JUSTIFY IT
PETROLEUM ,NATURAL GAS ARE MINERALS HAVING ORGANIC CHARACTER ARE LIQUID AND GAS RESPECTIVELY…..JUSTIFY IT…
Organic And Inorganic Minerals
The Differences in Mineral Forms
Most knowledgeable people today recognize that the body must have certain minerals to accomplish its work and preserve its health. However, only a few realize that these minerals must be in their organic state to do us any good at all.
Please understand these facts:
Minerals are inorganic as they exist naturally in the soil and water.
Minerals are organic as they exist in plants and animals.
Only plants can transform inorganic minerals into organic minerals.
Animals must eat plants or plant-eating animals to obtain their organic minerals.
Inorganic minerals are useless and injurious to the animal organism.
3.2 How the Confusion Began
Because inorganic minerals and organic minerals have the same chemical compositions, they were confused by the early nutritionists. The mineral, iron, in the bloodstream has the same chemical composition as the mineral, iron, in a nail—iron is iron, after all. However, these nutritionists incorrectly reasoned that there were no other differences between these two forms of iron. As a consequence, there actually were iron mineral supplements that consisted of surplus powdered nails.
Perhaps you have heard the expression, “mad enough to chew nails.” In this case, mad or unbalanced is certainly the correct word.
These nutritionists made an error in reasoning by assuming that a chemical similarity in minerals also meant there was a nutritive similarity between organic and inorganic minerals. While it is true that the same minerals found in the human body are also found in the soil and water it is wrong to assume that the minerals in the soil are food for man. We are not soil eaters—we are plant eaters.
It is necessary that the minerals in the soil be elaborated into organic compounds by the plant before they can be |assimilated by the body. The various mineral compounds produced by the chemist differ in their structure and in the relative positions of their component molecules than those produced in the plant.
Over sixty years ago a German scientist named Abderhalden conducted a series of experiments comparing how several species absorbed different forms of iron. He found that animals fed with food poor in iron, plus in addition of inorganic iron, were unable in the long run to produce as much hemoglobin as those, receiving a natural iron-sufficient diet.
While the inorganic iron may be absorbed into the body, it is not utilized in the formation of hemoglobin, but remains unused within the tissues. Abderhalden also concluded that any apparent benefit of the inorganic iron resulted from its stimulating effect.
Chemically, it is true that iron in the bloodstream and iron in nails are the same and that calcium in rocks (known as dolomite) is identical to calcium in the bones.
However, it is a grave error to believe that the body can digest and assimilate and utilize powdered nails and crushed rocks.
3.3 Mineral Supplements
The idea of administering inorganic minerals as foods and remedies for man started with the German scientist Hensel in the early twentieth century. Later the homeopaths expanded upon his idea and made numerous artificial mineral preparations called cell salts, which are still sold today as popular “cures” for mineral deficiencies. Today mineral supplements exist in many forms and come from many sources. They are all useless.
Mineral supplements are of no benefit to the body because they are: 1) inorganic and 2) fragmented.
Because mineral supplements are inorganic, the body cannot assimilate or use them. In fact, the body must work harder to compensate for the inbalance created by ingesting these supplements. The body accelerates its eliminative activities and works hard to expel these foreign substances. This stimulation is often mistaken for the “beneficial action” of the supplement. Actually, the supplements are not beneficial—they are harmful—and they are inanimate and therefore incapable of acting (except chemically).
As health consumers have grown more aware of the differences between organic and inorganic minerals, so have producers of these supplements. Consequently, there are now mineral supplements which are advertised as coming from “organic” sources. These are equally useless because they exist in a fragmented state, extracted from the sources within which they naturally occur.
Minerals do not work in isolation. When they are extracted from their natural sources, the other co-existing vitamins, minerals, enzymes, etc., are not also extracted. Even if they were, the process of laboratory extraction destroys any vital benefits that may have been associated with the minerals.
Minerals must be consumed in their natural, unfragmented and organic state to be of any use to the body. The best mineral supplements are those naturally occurring in mineral-rich foods in their unprocessed state—fresh fruits, vegetables, nuts, seeds and sprouts.
3.4 Mineral Waters
Like mineral supplements, mineral waters cannot provide any beneficial minerals to the body. Any minerals contained in such waters are inorganic and must be expelled by the body. Should an excess of these inorganic minerals be consumed in the water, the body cannot rid itself of them fast enough and they are deposited within the body.
These inorganic mineral deposits lead to kidney and gallstone formation, hardening of the arteries, arthritis, heart trouble, ossification of the brain and other serious diseases. The unexpelled mineral matter from mineral-containing waters combines with cholesterol to form plaques. These plaques lead to cardiovascular problems, and they join with uric acid to cause arthritic and rheumatic complaints.
The body cells can use only pure (distilled) water—such as that found in fruits and plants—and they reject all inorganic minerals consumed in mineral-laden waters.
When mineralized waters are drunk, a condition known as leukocytosis occurs within the body in thirty minutes to three hours after drinking. Leukocytosis is the proliferation of white blood cells which are the body’s first line of defense against foreign and harmful body substances—in this case, the inorganic minerals in the water.
Mineral waters cannot furnish the body with any needed elements other than the water itself. The remaining inorganic minerals are either eliminated through the skin, kidneys, etc., or they are deposited within the body where they may cause eventual harm.
Sea water is our “richest” mineral water, yet it is poisonous. Similarly, all other mineralized waters are simply dirty waters, contaminated with inorganic matter which is pathogenic to the body.
3.5 How Inorganic Minerals Are Transformed
Even plants, when in their embryonic state, cannot use inorganic minerals in the soil, but instead feed on the organic compounds contained within its seed. Not until its roots and leave? are grown can a plant utilize the inorganic minerals of the soil.
The changing of inorganic matter into organic matter takes place principally in the green leaves of the plant by means of photosynthesis. Only by the presence of chlorophyll is the plant able to utilize the inorganic carbon molecule and convert it with hydrogen and oxygen into the organic combinations of starch and sugar. And, ultimately, the plant combines nitrogen and other mineral elements from the soil into more complex organic combinations. Only the chlorophyll-bearing plants have the ability to assimilate iron, calcium and other minerals from the soil and to use the resulting combinations to construct nucleo-proteins.
Vital changes occur in all minerals as they pass into the structure of plants. These changes cannot be isolated by normal chemical laboratory processes which destroy living plant tissues to analyze them. Such crude methods of studying the role of organic minerals in an organism is somewhat akin to the old medical practice of dissecting cadavers to look for evidence of the human soul.
sir ji plz visit indian petroleum ministry side. and still there r lots of answer given by bpsc r wrong. like north bihar is famous for flood. its seems lots of chuitya ppl inside in bpsc. clay soil, leaves, sexual reproduction,energy in 1994, state electric boards answer still wrong.
today highcourt directed to bpsc publish the fresh result on the basis on new answersheet…without affected of passed student.
is this news true?
offcurse true..you can see this news on E tv bihar
At the very onset I want to congratulate 600 odd aspirants who will get chance to participate in the mains. Tough luck for those who deserved to be in but could not get chance due to worst system prevailing in our country especially in Bihar. Hard work never goes in vain!
As regards to Justice Tripathi he has to survive himself. That’s why he killed time and was always in favour of respondents in this case! Even when they accepted their mistake at this level. Perhaps his career progression depends on General Administration of Bihar that’s why! If not so why he always gave time to Commission and it’s so called experts. Perhaps the single judge who rightly gave judgment during 48-52nd BPSC Examination was honest one. But the result was, his judgment was reversed by double bench.
There was an incident in previous batch perhaps 42nd batch of BPSC wherein a data entry operator kept on daily rated basis had wrongfully (hopefully) missed names of 16 top reserved category aspirants and they were not called for viva. But as he was not so called expert his mistake was taken note of and aggrieved candidates got justice! This is not applicable for these super experts! They are privileged ones. In the judgment that followed those who wrongfully got higher ranks were not given appointment letters. Even some were left out after revision.
Is not it funny that Justice Tripathy is saving those who have already filled forms of mains and that is why some odd 600 are getting chance. What a judge and what a judgment?
Wish me luck for mains and if I am unable to get through the tough competition and unprecedented obstacles of the system I will be back to try my luck in the next batch.
Together we can change the system! If there is will
uppcs me CSAT lagoo kar diya gaya h..as per notification………..
amazing… they don’t know about minerals….. they can visit wikipedia and have proper definition…
I smell clear cur conspiracy here…..
scientifically , generally and universally ‘minerals’ are inorganic solids….
All unsuccessful candidates will be given 9 marks. Cut-off will be 103. Mains will be in March
SOURCE….?
what is the source of information
In science, a mineral is defined as a solid of definite chemical composition with a repeatable ordered crystalline structure. A liquid is never a mineral in this definition.
However, in the english language, the term mineral is sometimes used in reference to natural earth (non-living) resources, and thus, in a non-scientific sense, petroleum resources are mineral resources and deposits of petroleum are often called mineral deposits. Coal, sands, gravel, and such would also be considered a mineral resource in this particular usage, even though coal is a rock, not a mineral, and the others are mixes of multiple minerals and or rocks and not strictly speaking, minerals.
A mineral is a naturally occurring solid formed through geological processes that has a characteristic chemical composition, a highly ordered atomic structure, and specific physical properties.
Chemically, petroleum/crude oil is not a mineral for two reasons: it’s liquid, and it consists of many different chemicals. Its chemical composition is not always the same.
why not lodge a case against BSSC for not giving proper time, i.e 2hrs and 15 mnts, BSSC has given this time including fill up the answer sheet and question booklet, who will fulfill that 15 minutes, why they have not notify earlier.
I am going to court
thank you
why not lodge a case against BSSC for not giving proper time, i.e 2hrs and 15 mnts, BSSC has given this time including fill up the answer sheet and question booklet, who will fulfill that 15 minutes, why they have not notify earlier.
I am going to court
pata nhi kis se ye log question paper set karwate hai
ratish bhai pls focus on bpsc pt results
State has became the centre of corruption even the period when corruption has became the burning issue in the country and several mass agitation are seen in the country but this corner of the country is still in dark how can a life state sleep like that.
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2011/12/jpsc-is-top-seller-of-prime-jobs.html
NEWS ABOUT BIHAR SSC —–
20 QUESTION 2006 UPSC SE LIYA GAYA
13 QUESTION YAHA SE LIYA GAYA (QUES. NO. – 13, 14, 19, 23, 25, 27, 28, 29, 34, 42, 46, 47, 48) JISME 4 QUESTION KA GALAT ANSWER DIYA GAYA HAI.
http://psconline.wordpress.com/2011/02/04/latest-current-affairs-february-2011/
answers are not wrong
@Ajaya, Kindly tell us the name of examination from which ’13 questions’ have been COPIED.
sir, shayad yai kerela pcs ka question ho sakta hai ?
33 (20 13) questions out of 50 G.S. questions in Bihar SSC have been blindly copied from other examinations. This is not a fair practice.There seems to be some mala fide intention on the part of BSSC authorities.
Happy New year to all my fellow competitors, may this year bring us all success and some good sense to BPSC.
Nav varsha mangalmaya ho !
happy new year all of you
ratihsh bhai what is the latest update pls share it
Yaar ye ssc waale v yahi comment karenge kya?kal group D waala v yahan comment karne lagega n will create chaos. Yaar pls keep this forum only 4 bpsc. I request Anubhooti sir 2 pls remove older posts which r irrelevent now. Happy nu year to all aspirants and pls keep updating & keep up ur tempo high. Jai Bihar!!
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2012/01/year-2012-will-begin-from-courtroom-for.html
Happy new year 2012
Wish all our friends very very happy and successful new year.
As court holiday is over and all eyes are on Justice Tripathi with the expectation that he will pronounce the judgment in 53-55 BPSC PT Result case which is kept reserve after conclusive hearing on November 28
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2012/01/justice-tripathi-to-pronounce-judgment.html
Hi friends…………..
Wish very one very happy new year
As court holiday is over and all eyes are on Justice Tripathi with the expectation that he will pronounce the judgment in 53-55 BPSC PT Result case which is kept reserve after conclusive hearing on November 28.
As far as legal aspect regarding the timeline for pronouncement of judgment is concerned it is totally depend on the discretion of justice.
As there is no rule right now that force the court to pronounce their reserved judgment in given time so aspirant left only guessing and praying that Justice Tripathi will pronounce his judgment that he has kept reserved mode since November 28.
Students are guessing that Justice Tripathi will soon pronounce his verdict that will force the BPSC to release additional result.
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2012/01/justice-tripathi-to-pronounce-judgment.html
AAJ BPSC CASE TO DECESION AA RHA HAI.
KYOKI AAJ KE CAUSE LIST MAIN CASE NO. 13022 DAAL DIYA GAYA HAI.
today is judgment day guys. the matter is on top of the list. i will keep you people posted.
judgment will be delivered around 11am today.
So finally wait is over.
cutoff fixed 103 marks.
what does it mean. will 8 marks be added.
no, only extra 518 results will be published on 103 cutoff.
court ne aayog ko kha ke aap expert committe ke review ke aadhar par naye sire se result jari kare, lekin isse pass wale student effected na ho.—Etv
As per ETV Bihar the HC has directed the BPSC to declare fresh result after “re-evaluation without affecting the candidates who were declared successful in previous result”. So as per my understanding “effectively” the cut-off would be reduced by two marks in all categories. Am I right?
How come you came up with two marks reduction? please explain.
One question deleted. One answer changed. So, there must be some candidates (among those who were declared passed) who were “lucky”twice. Now they would have to be saved. So, reduction of two marks. Thatz what I am guessing.
court ne ball aayog ke pale main daal diya. aayog 915 ko save karne ke liye 3 no. cut-off kam karega ?
today highcourt directed to bpsc publish the fresh result on the basis on new answersheet…without affected of passed student.
today highcourt directed to bpsc publish the fresh result on the basis on new answersheet…without affected of passed student
As per court judgement, already QUALIFIED candidates should not to be affected. Therefore, obiously, fresh result will be prepared on the basis of such a cut-off that will not affect the already qualified candidates.Moreover,re-evaluation will be done on the basir of 9 wrong questions.
deleted question aur jis question ka answer sahi kiya gya hai..wo dono question kaun se hain…plz rply……
tripathi paisa khaya hai
aapney khilaaya?
Really GREAT NEWS for already qualified candidates of 53-55 BPSC PT. They will remain UNAFFECTED by the court judgement.
http://patnahighcourt.bih.nic.in/judgment/pdf.aspx?ord=7&noc=15&caseno1=13022&yr=2011
read the judgement…
judgment is on court site. According to it to save successfull candidats bpsc may declare extra result. here is link of the judgment
http://patnahighcourt.bih.nic.in/judgment/pdf.aspx?ord=7&noc=15&caseno1=13022&yr=2011
http://patnahighcourt.bih.nic.in/judgment/pdf.aspx?ord=7&noc=15&caseno1=13022&yr=2011
judgment is on the following link. according to judgment to save passed students bpsc can declare more result.
http://patnahighcourt.bih.nic.in/judgment/pdf.aspx?ord=7&noc=15&caseno1=13022&yr=2011
according to judgment to save passed students extra result should be published. please follow the following link of judgment
http://patnahighcourt.bih.nic.in/judgment/pdf.aspx?ord=7&noc=15&caseno1=13022&yr=2011
ON WHAT BASIS THE NEW 600 RESULTS WOULD BE RELEASED???
PLS GUIDE….
ON WHAT BASIS THE NEW 600 RESULTS WOULD BE PUBLISHED???PLS GUIDE…
saaley padhaayee kerle nahi to zindagi bhar court hi jaata reh jaayega
A series of writ applications came to be filed
before the High Court by all such candidates whose names did
not figure in the result of the PT Examination declared by the
Bihar Public Service Commission ( hereinafter referred to as
the Commission or BPSC) for what is known as 52
nd
to 55
th
batch. Many intervention applications have also been filed
with prayers therein that they too be impleaded as petitioners
to the writ applications since they have common cause and
relief. All have a common grievance against the declaration
of the said result in the background that the examination
conducted by the Commission has not been fair in the sense
that many a questions which were set for the PT Examination
had either wrong answers or were wrong questions, at times
verging on absurdity or even a right question had a wrong
answer provided in the master answer sheet.
2. There is unanimity amongst the petitioners that
any declaration of result based on such question bank set by
so-called panel of experts cannot form the basis for testing
the knowledge of the candidates in a fair and square manner,
even if it is for the preliminary examination. For after all
qualifying in the preliminary examination is going to form the
basis for enabling a candidate to sit for the mains
examination. Their entire career is therefore jeoparidised
because of the so-called act of the BPSC which has been
labeled as callous in approach in conducting such an important 30
examination.
3. From the pleadings it is evident that a lot of hue
and cry was raised, which compelled the respondent BPSC to
examine the questions as well as the model answers and even
BPSC agreed that 8 of the questions out of 150 questions
were required to be deleted for re-evaluation purposes and
they were willing to declare the result on the basis of 142
questions only. This, however, does not satisfy the petitioners
and they insist on either cancellation of the preliminary
examination or reducing the entry level cut off marks by as
many questions / marks which were found to be erroneous.
4. Several instances have been cited in the
affidavits filed by the various petitioners with model answers
provided by the BPSC to strengthen their cases for serious relook at the declared preliminary examination results. The
Court examined those questions closely and there was near
unanimity that the questions which had been set up by the socalled experts and model answers given to those set of
questions by the question setters did require a re-look. It was
in this background that vide order dated 9.9.2011 a direction
was issued upon the Commission to take help of another set
of experts, examine all the questions and model answers
afresh, taking into consideration the objections raised by the
candidates either through the present writ applications or even
objections filed directly with the Commission.31
5. Counsel for the Commission did agree to accept
the direction of this Court and revert on the issue within the
given time frame prayed on their behalf. The matter was
finally placed by way of an affidavit filed on behalf of the
Commission where they did agree that some of the earlier
questions were wrong questions or the answer given to the
right question was a wrong answer and they are willing to
abide by any direction which may come from the Court on the
given set of facts. They, however, do take a stand that
cancellation of the preliminary examination and re-conducting
the same may not be a practical and prudent exercise because
holding such an examination of such magnitude is not an easy
exercise. Further it is going to delay the recruitment process,
which has already been delayed for three batches as the
present examination is being conducted for the 52
nd
to 55
th
batch.
6. After the affidavit on behalf of the Commission
was filed, divergent kind of statements emerged on behalf of
the petitioners. Though by and large the majority are not in
favour of cancellation of the examination as a whole now but
they insist that since a number of questions or answers were
found to be erroneous, the Commission should be directed to
reduce the present cut off marks by as many marks and allow
all those candidates who come within the newly fixed cut off
marks to appear in the mains examination. For after all, it is 32
only a question of giving an opportunity to a larger section of
the students to establish their credibility as well as their
selectibility on the posts which have been advertised, on the
basis of the mains examination, followed by interview which
is still to come. Since many a candidates are going to become
over-age, this may be their last opportunity to have a go at a
Government job and their plight should also be taken into
consideration by taking a broader view of the issue.
7. In support of the reduction of cut off marks by
as many questions which have been found to be erroneous,
reliance has been placed on the decision rendered in the case
of Akshey Lal Pandit v. State of Bihar, 2011 (3) PLJR 258.
The said case related to selection of Civil Judges of Junior
Division, which also became a subject matter of controversy
since large number of questions were found to be erroneous.
Keeping in mind the acceptance of the so-called error in the
questions set by the Commission, a direction was issued by
the Division Bench, upon the Commission to reduce the
qualifying cut off marks by 25 marks and allow all the
candidates thereafter to sit in the mains examination.
8. Yet another decision which has been relied is
the case of Pankaj Sharma v. State of Jammu and
Kashmir and others, (2008) 4 SCC 273. This is a matter
which arose from a civil services examination conducted by J
& K Public Service Commission.33
9. The present controversy which has arisen for
consideration by this Court is not the first of its kind. BPSC
has been dragged to Court on earlier occasions also because
they have failed to couduct a fool-proof examination without
any surrounding controversy with regard to the questions set
or the manner in which results have been declared. On earlier
occasions there were even insinuations and allegations of
malpractices etc. which, however, is not the issue in the
present set of writ applications. The controversy is limited to
the correctness of the questions which were set and the socalled model answers provided by the experts based on which
the results of the preliminary examination came to be
declared.
10. BPSC is a constitutional body and it has an
obligation to ensure holding of a free and fair examination,
maintaining the utmost standards and probity without giving
any leeway for any kind of doubt, dispute or controversy
being raised with regard to results of any examination
conducted by them. The Court however is not unmindful of
the fact that the Commision has no mechanism to set questions
for various examinations, which they hold and they have to
rely on outside agencies or a panel of so-called experts,
whose services are taken from time to time. Unfortunately in
the present case, BPSC is facing a flak not because of any
failure on their part but because of certain omission or failure 34
on the part of the experts, who provided the question bank as
well as the so-called model answers. But, it is the credibility
of the BPSC which is at stake as they are the body saddled
with responsibility to hold such examination to fill up public /
civil posts under the constitutional provision. The Court has
been told that to prevent any leakage of question papers they
cannot scrutinize the correctness of the questions or answers
until examination is held.
11. It may be so, therefore the Court would want
BPSC to review the list of so-called experts and weed out the
elements who have caused such embarrassment and
litigation, at least for the future examinations. It will be in
their interest to do so.
12. Coming to the question whether the
contention of the petitioners that the present cut off
marks/qualifying marks should be reduced by the number of
questions which have been found to be erroneous and be made
the basis for declaration of the result afresh or whether the
evaluation should be re-done on the basis of total correct
answers which the Commission has now zeroed down as per
the second experts panel opinion, is the crux of the dispute
now.
13. This Court does not find any rationale in the
demand for reducing the minimum qualifying marks by as
many marks on the basis of questions which have been found 35
to be wrong in the present case, by the second expert
committee because the final evaluation has to be made on the
basis of the final tally of correct set of questions which now
remain. Evaluation has to be made across the board on the
basis of the correct answers, to correct questions, which have
to be considered now. Reducing the cut-off marks across the
board will bring within its ambit a large number of candidates
by giving them a kind of unfair advantage without any
scientific basis defeating the very objective of holding a
preliminary examination.
14. In the opinion of this Court, the proper
mechanism to be adopted would be to carry out a fresh
evaluation of all the answer sheets of the candidates who
have participated in the preliminary examinations by weeding
out the wrong questions which have now been accepted to be
wrong by the 2
nd
expert committee and which the
Commission has gracefully accepted by way of the affidavit
filed by them on 11.11.2011. The details of the questions
which have been found to be erroneous or wrong or the
questions whose answers were found to be wrong have been
stated in detail in the second supplementary counter affidavit.
To be definitive as to the exact stand of the BPSC, their
assertion made in the supplementary counter affidavit is
being reproduced here for ready reference:
“4. That accordingly in compliance of this
Hon`ble Court‟s order dated 9.9.2011, a 36
Committee of experts comprising of 13 very
senior retired and working Professors of
Patna University and Magadh University
was constituted. The Committee of experts
reviewed all the 150 questions of General
studies paper and determined their answers.
While doing so, they also considered each and
every suggestion given by the writ petitioners
as also suggestions of the candidates who had
filed representations in the Commission. The
new Expert Committee differed from old one
in respect of answers of the following
questions of booklet series „A‟:-
1. Question No.6:- Minerals are
(A) Liquids
(B) Inorganic Solids
(C ) Gases
(D) All of the above
Some candidates have referred to the
NCERT Text Book, which suggests option (D)
whereas as per Reference Books the answer
should be Option (B). In view of this
ambiguity the experts have recommended to
delete this question. The previous expert
committee had suggested option „B‟ as
correct answer.
2. Question No. 30:- Till 2010, which State
Governments have provided 50 percent
reservation for women in local bodies?
(A) Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Rajashthan
(B) Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Himachal
Pradesh
(C) Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Kerala
(D) Bihar, Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh37
Some candidates have suggested that till
2010, 50% reservation to women in civil
bodies was available in Kerala also whereas
Option „B‟ decided by the Commission as
correct answer does not include Kerala. The
new expert committee suggested that till
2010, 50% reservation to women in civil
bodies was available in Bihar, Madhya
Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh and Kerala. As
none of the alternative options include all the
four States, so all options are wrong. Hence,
they have recommended deleting this
question also.
3. Question No.79:- Major Source of oceanic
salinity is
(A) rivers
(B) land
(C) wind
(D) ash from volcanoes
The new expert committee has suggested
option (B) instead of Option (A) as suggested
by the erstwhile expert committee.
4. Question No.103: Commercial sources of
energy purely consist of
(A) Power, Coal, Oil, Gas, Hydroelectricity
and uranium
(B) Coal, Oil, Firewood, Vegetable Waste and
Agricultural Waste
(C ) Power, Coal, Animal dung and Firewood
(D) Coal, Gas, Oil and Firewood
This question had been deleted on the
suggestion of the previous expert committee.
However, the new expert committee has
suggested option (A) as the correct answer.38
5. Question No. 113:- Consider the following
about the „Rolling Plan‟
I. A plan for the current year which includes
the annual budget.
II. A Plan for a fixed number of years, say 3,
4 or 5
III. It is revised every year as per
requirements of the economy
IV. A perspective plan for 10, 15 or 20 years
Which of the above are correct?
(A) I and II
(B) I and III
(C) II and III
(D) I, II, III and IV
This question had also been deleted on the
suggestion of the previous expert committee.
However, the new expert committee has
suggested option (D) as the correct answer.
6. Question No.115: Patna International
Airport is directly connected with
(A) Kathmandu (Nepal), New Delhi, Kolkata,
Mumbai, Lucknow, Varanasi and Ranchi
(B) Bengaluru, Hyderabad and Dhaka
(C) Islamabad, Dhaka and Bengaluru
(D) Washington, Dhaka and Chennai
The new expert committee has suggested
deletion of this question as all the four
options are wrong.
5. That thus the new expert committee
agreed with the suggestions of the previous
expert committee to delete question Nos. 91,
99, 104, 109, 116 and 122 (six questions)
while they have suggested that question nos.
103 and 113 should not be deleted. They have 39
suggested correct answers for the above two
questions as stated herein above. The new
experts have also differed from the previous
experts in respect of the answer of question
no.79 as stated herein above. However, the
new expert committee has suggested deletion
of three additional questions, i.e. question
Nos. 6, 30 and 115 finding the objections of
the candidates to be justified.
6. That in so far as the present writ petition
is concerned, the writ petitioners had
contended that Question nos. 91, 103, 104,
109 and 113 of Set „A‟ equivalent to Question
nos. 121, 133, 134, 139, 143 of Set „B‟
respectively has wrongly been deleted which
have a definite answer. The Expert
Committee so constituted in so far as a
question no.103 and 113 agrees with the view
of the writ petitioners and suggested that
Question No.103 and 113 should not be
deleted but suggested deletion of Question
Nos.91, 104 and 109 of Set „A‟ as was
suggested by previous expert committee.
7. That the writ petitioners have further
contended that Question Nos. 6, 14, 30, 45
and 50 of Set „A‟ equivalent to Question Nos.
36, 44, 60, 75 and 80 of Set „B‟ respectively
has different answers to that what has been
fixed by the B.P.S.C. The Committee of
Experts has suggested to delete Question
No.6, agreed with the option „D‟ as the
correct answer of Question no.14 as was fixed
by the Commission upon suggestion of the
earlier Committee of Experts, has suggested 40
to delete Question No.30, has agreed with
Option „A‟ as the correct answer of Question
No.45 as was fixed by the Commission upon
suggestion of the earlier Committee of
Experts and has agreed with Option „D‟ as
the correct answer of Question No.50 as was
fixed by the Commission upon suggestion of
the earlier Committee of Experts.
8. That besides the new Committee of
Experts has also suggested deleting Question
No.115 as was suggested by the writ
petitioners to be deleted.
9. That it would thus be manifest that the
new Committee of Experts have suggested to
delete question Nos. 6, 30, 91, 99, 104, 109,
115, 116 and 122 (9 questions) of Set „A‟ and
differed with the views of previous Experts in
respect of answer of Question No.79 of Set
„A‟ as has been stated above and have
suggested Option „B‟ to be the correct answer
instead of Option „A‟ as was suggested by the
earlier Expert Committee.”
15. When the Court questioned the learned
senior counsel representing the Commission as to what would
be the fall-out if the evaluaition of the answer sheets is made
now by deleting nine questions and accepting two quesitons
with correct and definite answers, on the basis of some
exercise carried out by the Commission, they come with a
rough figure that 915 candidates who have already been
declared successful on the basis of earlier evaluation will stand
ousted and many more new candidates would be declared to 41
be successful.
16. But once a candidate has been declared
successful, his ouster from the list of successful candidates
will generate another kind of litigation which the BPSC wants
to avoid in the interest of cutting down further delay in
conducting the mains examination. They are therefore willing
to retain them and also allow the would be successful
candidates to come in. It is also their stand that there will be a
reduction of marks on the present cut off marks which has
been fixed on the basis of earlier declaration of result and that
will bring in more candidates in the ambit of qualified persons
under various categories. In fact, despite so-called ratio of 10
percent which has been fixed by the BPSC for allowing the
successful candidates to appear in the mains examination the
total candidates who would be allowed to appear in the mains
examination is going to get enhanced by some more
percentage points bringing within its fold a few thousand
more candidates. They are, however, willing to accommodate
all those candidates now, if it allows the controversy to rest
and the Commission to go ahead with conduct of the mains
examinastion after carrying out the re-evaluation.
17. Though in the judgment relied by the
petitioners which is the case of Akshey Lal Pandit (supra)
the Court decided to reduce the minimum eligibility by 25
marks to sit for the main examination but that was based in 42
the given facts and circumstances and taking into
consideration that the total number of applicants for the
vacancy of judicial officers was about 21000 only but in the
present case the number of applicants runs into lakhs and
such an approach would frustrate the very object of holding
a preliminary examination to weed out the non-serious
students from the contention.
18. A controversy of similar kind had once arisen
way back in the case of Ganesh Prasad Yadav v. State of
Bihar, 1995 (2) PLJR 170. The Division Bench after going
into the details of the said dispute had opined as under:
“36. No doubt, there are mistakes in the
alternative answers or responses to the four
questions, but on that basis it cannot be said
that the Commission adopted any unfair
means or acted in an unfair manner, on the
other hand, the aforesaid mistakes appear to
have been committed by the experts to whom
the work of setting of questions and their
suggestive answers was entrusted. It cannot
be said that there was unfair treatment to the
non-selectees in particular. All the
candidates including the successful
candidates have answered the same set of
questions and in that view of the matter
either all the candidates have suffered
equally or took advantages of wrong
suggestive answers. In that view of the
matter, in spite of the aforesaid errors, in my
view, it would not be proper to quash the 43
preliminary test for the aforesaid defects.”
(emphasis mine)
19. Similar is the situation in the present case as
well. The advantage or disadvantage from a wrong question
or a wrong answer would be there against one and all
because it cannot be said that successful candidates
managed to hit the bull’s eye with a correct answer even
though the question was wrong or vice versa.
20. The Court therefore comes to a considered
opinion that a fairer approach to the whole problem would be
by permitting BPSC to carry out a fresh evaluation of all the
answer sheets on the basis of their stand emerging from the
opinion of the second expert group. If such an exercise is
permitted then it will amount to a fair evaluation of all the
candidates without giving any unfair advantage to either
successful candidates or the unsuccessful ones because they
will all be tested on a common platform. In fact this is one of
the reasons why this Court is not willing to accept the
submission of some of the counsels that as many marks should
be added to all the candidates treating them as correct
answers to the incorrect questions. Such an approach will
make no difference to the final standing of the successful
candidates whose results have been declared.
21. In the totality therefore, the Court comes to a
considered conclusion that the BPSC should now re-declare
the result of the preliminary examination after a fresh 44
evaluation on the basis of the recommendations of the second
expert committee and that should form the basis for conduct of
the mains examination which is yet to follow.
22. It is made clear that none of the successful
candidates earlier declared successful on the basis of
declaration of the result would be ousted from the list of such
candidates who will be entitled to sit for the mains
examination. If the exercise brings in more candidates within
the zone of successful candidates by being permitted to sit for
the mains examination, so be it, but the exercise shall not be
done to the detriment of any of the successful candidates
whose results have already been declared earlier.
23. These writ applications are allowed in terms of
the direction issued above.
24. Some concerted effort was made on behalf of
some of the counsels representing the petitioners to persist
with their submission that there are still some mistakes with
the answers or the questions despite the scrutiny by the
second expert committee. With due respect to such counsels,
those arguments are for the sake of arguments because the
answers which they try to demonstrate before the Court are
based on some publication made by the NCERT which by
itself cannot be treated to be the final referral material for
all the questions on the subject, which became the basis for
testing the awareness of the students participating in the 45
preliminary examination.
25. Let it be clarified that the order passed in these
bunch of writ applications shall apply to all the candidates
who have participated in the preliminary examination
irrespective of the fact whether they have approached the
Court or filed interlocutory applications to be impleaded as
petitioners and have not been allowed, looking at the nature
of the relief so granted.
26. Before parting the Court would also like to
record that the view expressed by this Court finds support
from the judgment of a Division Bench delivered in the case of
Bihar Public Service Commission v. Mukesh Kumar
Singh, reported in 2009 (3) PLJR 878.
rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)
r u a mental case dear?
post card bhejna hoga.
sabhi writ karne walo ko.
address judgment me hai friends.
400 se jada hai writ karne wale.
move double bench
or perish
all is not well…..
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2012/01/patna-high-court-pronounced-his-verdict.html?showComment=1325678524906#comment-c51985308682613675
pass candidate ka copy dubara nahi janchi jayege ?
kya yahi justice hai ?
http://jagran.com/bihar/patna-city-8721782.html
http://www.jagran.com/bihar/patna-city-8721782.html
Ajay you are very rightly said his career progression depends on General Administration of Bihar that’s why! this happened. Anwer-sheet must be rexamined for all candidate, othrwise the case should be filed to the SC.
JUSTICE WAS DONE.GOOD NEWS FOR QUALIFIED CANDIDATES.THEY SHOULD VERY CAREFUL AS THE SAME KIND OF JUSTICE WILL BE DONE AFTER MAINS AND ALSO INTERVIEW.BYE.
HOW THESE NEWSPAPERS HAVE MENTIONED THAT ANSWER SHEET OF SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATES WILL NOT BE EVALUATED. nowhere in judgment is mentioned that revaluation will not be done OF successful candidates. Only it has mentioned that
“It is made clear that none of the successful
candidates earlier declared successful on the basis of
declaration of the result would be ousted from the list of such
candidates who will be entitled to sit for the mains
examination. If the exercise brings in more candidates within
the zone of successful candidates by being permitted to sit for
the mains examination, so be it, but the exercise shall not be
done to the detriment of any of the successful candidates
whose results have already been declared earlier.*
SO HOW THESE NEWSPAPERS HAS MENTIONED THAT ANSWER SHEET OF SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATES WILL NOT BE EVALUATED.
second expert committe kai anusar agar kisi SUCESSFUL candidate ka number cut-off se 3 ya 4 kam hota hai to sabhi ke liye cutt-off 3 ya 4 kam karna hi justice hoga.
True. These journalists are morons. Even our answer-sheets would be re-evaluated and new result will be declared so that all the successful candidates are adjusted in that too.
khush hua na bhoshriwala chotta fail student.
justice half done…….
Reevaluation must be done to all candidates….
Cut of marks for all the candidates must be same…if out of previously successful candidates around 950 are going out… let us check what is cut of marks of the last candidate of those 950. for example if last successful candidate’s cut of marks (out of 950) reduces to 102 then have overall cut of as 102 in fresh list of successful candidate.
I hope BPSC does justice in preparing fresh result.
any way what next do u expect RATISH BHAI.
The effective part of judgement may be seen as under:- (dont’ go on the reports in newspaper)
20. The Court therefore comes to a considered opinion that a fairer approach to the whole problem would be by permitting BPSC to carry out a fresh evaluation of all the answer sheets on the basis of their stand emerging from the opinion of the second expert group. If such an exercise is permitted then it will amount to a fair evaluation of all the candidates without giving any unfair advantage to either successful candidates or the unsuccessful ones because they will all be tested on a common platform. In fact this is one of the reasons why this Court is not willing to accept the submission of some of the counsels that as many marks should be added to all the candidates treating them as correct answers to the incorrect questions. Such an approach will make no difference to the final standing of the successful candidates whose results have been declared.
21. In the totality therefore, the Court comes to a considered conclusion that the BPSC should now re-declare the result of the preliminary examination after a fresh evaluation on the basis of the recommendations of the second expert committee and that should form the basis for conduct of the mains examination which is yet to follow.
22. It is made clear that none of the successful candidates earlier declared successful on the basis of declaration of the result would be ousted from the list of such candidates who will be entitled to sit for the mains examination. If the exercise brings in more candidates within the zone of successful candidates by being permitted to sit for the mains examination, so be it, but the exercise shall not be done to the detriment of any of the successful candidates whose results have already been declared earlier.
I hope it will clear the air.
The effective part of judgement may be seen as under:- (dont’ go on the reports in newspaper)
20. The Court therefore comes to a considered opinion that a fairer approach to the whole problem would be by permitting BPSC to carry out a fresh evaluation of all the answer sheets on the basis of their stand emerging from the opinion of the second expert group. If such an exercise is permitted then it will amount to a fair evaluation of all the candidates without giving any unfair advantage to either successful candidates or the unsuccessful ones because they will all be tested on a common platform. In fact this is one of the reasons why this Court is not willing to accept the submission of some of the counsels that as many marks should be added to all the candidates treating them as correct answers to the incorrect questions. Such an approach will make no difference to the final standing of the successful candidates whose results have been declared.
21. In the totality therefore, the Court comes to a considered conclusion that the BPSC should now re-declare the result of the preliminary examination after a fresh evaluation on the basis of the recommendations of the second expert committee and that should form the basis for conduct of the mains examination which is yet to follow.
22. It is made clear that none of the successful candidates earlier declared successful on the basis of declaration of the result would be ousted from the list of such candidates who will be entitled to sit for the mains examination. If the exercise brings in more candidates within the zone of successful candidates by being permitted to sit for the mains examination, so be it, but the exercise shall not be done to the detriment of any of the successful candidates whose results have already been declared earlier.
I hope it will clear the air.
now, what is the cut off marks obc girl candidate please tel… me……
First of all we have to know which question is out and whose answer is changed only thereafter merit list will be decided.
Why have they deleted question that to which party A Raja belonged? Oh Sorry !! the answerthe currect answer was not an option, the correct answer is ‘BPSC Party’.
new result kb tk ayega????? cutoff kitni jayegi..???
ACCORDING TO RASTRIYA SAHARA LPA HAS BEEN FILED AGAINST THE SINGLE JUDGE BENCH ORDER
May be, NEXT HEARING IN DOUBLE BENCH on 9th Jan. 2012
http://www.rashtriyasahara.com/epapermain.aspx?queryed=13
Bspc पीटी मामले में एकल पीठ के आदेश को चुनौती
पटना (एसएनबी)। बिहार लोक सेवा आयोग (बीपीएससी) की 53वीं से 55वीं प्रारंभिक परीक्षा को लेकर पटना उच्च न्यायालय के एकल पीठ के आदेश को दो सदस्यीय पीठ के समक्ष चुनौती दी गयी है। उक्त अपील पर नौ जनवरी को दो सदस्यीय पीठ के समक्ष सुनवाई होने की संभावना है। एकल पीठ ने बुधवार को ही अपना फैसला दिया था। उसके आदेश को कुछ असफल अभ्यर्थियों ने वरीय अधिवक्ता मनन कुमार मिश्र के माध्यम से चुनौती दी है और कहा कि नौ गलत प्रश्नों के अंक असफल अभ्यर्थियों के अंकों में जोड़ दिये जाएं तथा कट ऑफ वही रखा जाय। एकल पीठ ने अपने आदेश में कहा था कि असफल अभ्यर्थियों की कॉपियों का पुनमरूल्यांकन किया जाय एवं पुनमरूल्यांकन के बाद मेधा सूची में आने वाले अभ्यर्थियों को मुख्य परीक्षा में शामिल किया जाय। सफल 15137 उम्मीदवारों की उत्तरपुस्तिकाओं की जांच नहीं होगी। पीटी परीक्षा में करीब 15 हजार अभ्यर्थियों को लिखित परीक्षा के लिए सफल घोषित किया था। मामला 53वीं से 55वीं प्रारंभिक परीक्षा के पीटी रिजल्ट का
now the lpa is in chief justice bench which will be heard on monday. Please follow the link
http://epaper.livehindustan.com/PUBLICATIONS/HT/HP/2012/01/06/ArticleHtmls/ÀFFÃFFIYFSX-IZY-dSXþMX-FSX-WXFBÊXIYûMÊX-IYe-SXûIY-06012012008083.shtml?Mode
LPA has been accepted by the division bench of Hon’ble Chief Justice Miss Rekha Manharlal Doshit and Justice B P Verma against the judgement given by Mr Tripathi on Wednesday.
The division bench will sit on this matter on monday 9th January.
Conformed by officials from Patna High Court.
Ye kya…… hamesha yahi hota rahega… ” hearing par hearing, hearing par hearing, hearing par hearing ….. and so on….
This was highly expected. Let’s hope there is proper judgment without loop-holes and at least mains can be conducted in March or April.
kya koroge bhai yahi system hai aaj ka …
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2012/01/legal-battle-moves-next-stage-as.html
In judicial services exam the division bench took less than 2months in delivering judgement;
Details are as given below;
Case No.: CWJC-5300/2011
Filed on: 17 Mar 2011 District: PATNA
AKSHEY LAL PANDIT Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
Subject;SELECTION , GAZETTED SER.(JUDICIAL SERVICES)
DISPOSED ON 11 May 2011
Petitioner’s Advocate:SURESH MISHRA
Respondent Advocate:DEVENDRA KR SINHA
DISPOSAL ON: 11 May 2011
In the Court of Before :- The Chief Justice & Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran
So in our case judgement should come by the end of March.
I hope it comes! The Chief Justice is perhaps more knowledgeable.What’s the use in killing time? More so when the type of knowledge these experts have can easily be predicted.They are going by the mass appeal and using hit and trial method to decide whether the questions are to be deleted or not. At one instance they are going by N.C.E.R.T. source and discarding reference books. Example in the case of question related to mineral. I do not understand what is their level of knowledge and judgment! Justice Tripathi was so confused that while summing up he discarded authenticity of N.C.E.R.T, even though he is satisfied with these bunch of experts. At once he came to conclusion that Commission is doing excellent work no matter how the numbers come but Commission is taking 10% of total appeared. In praising the Commission he is indirectly putting the blame on these different panel of experts. In the meantime real sufferers are only aspirants ( being tagged as successful and unsuccessful) What a shame and mockery! Hope for the best at the earliest.
Please someone tell me the LPA No. because I doubt the matter is listed on 9th in the chief’s court.
bihar mai expert flood ko famous mante hai. ye hai expert ka knowledge, lol
bhosririwala gadha saalon tum sab chutiyon ke pichware me danta karke muh se nakalne me harz nahi hai. saalon bahut pil karne ka sauk hai. saalon tum sab ne system ko mazak bana diya hai. bhar me jao bhoshriwalon.
bhosriwalon bhar me jao pil karne walon. chutia saala.
vk singh ki gand ki hawa kyu nikli hui hai bhaiyo…..
v k singh, aapke ghar me sabhi log waise hi hai kya jaisa aap likhte ho? Bachpan se aisa hi dekhe ho kya?
It seems that the legal web is not going to end soon for the aspirants of 53-55th Civil services examination conducted by BPSC as the applicants moved ahead with their LPA to the division bench of Patna High court that include Hon’ble Chief Justice Miss Rekha Manharlal Doshit and Justice B P Verma against the verdict given by Justice A K Tripathi on Wednesday.
http://inficentre.blogspot.com/2012/01/long-walk-ahead-for-applicants-as-div.html
sorry parmar
p a r mar
main pagal hoon.
What stupidity! Ye 400 paise wale students 15135 students ke marne ke piche lagen hein……..ye to had ho gayi yar……..why dont they understand paper was same for all and questions were deleted for all……….and what is the logic behind Mr. Mishra’s demand of giving 9 marks to all failed students……..Kya unke ladke ka case hota to aisa kahte…………pata nahi kanha se log aise acche jagah par bina gyan ke pahunch jate hein aur pure system ko hi kharab kar deten hein……….aaj isliye logon ko court ke naam par dar lagta hai…………..Jai ho aap char sau vidyarthi aur hamara Judicial system
kyu SAGAR bhai ye 400 writ karne wale aap 15135 pe bhari par rahe hai kya??????… tabhi to aapko court ke nam se darr lag raha hai kyuki waha sab kuch clear ho jayega…
ye jo aap aaj ke is system ko accha kah rahe hai to sayad aapko pata nahi ki yaha apne adhikar ke liye ladna padta hai aur tabhi jakar thoda milta hai… aaj ke politicians aur high profile logo ka chale to aam logo ko kuch bhi nahi milne denge…sare system ko kharid kar rakhe hai…
abhi bas aap PT aane ka kushi manaeye…. jab mains ho jayega tab aap bhi en 400 baccho ka bhasa boliyega aur court ka chhakar lagayege…. kyu ki waha bhi sab fixed hoto hai jaisa ki aap JPSC me dekh chuke hai…
system ko to aap jaise galat soch wale log kharab kar rahe hai…aisa lagta hai ki aapka bhi koi illegal entry se nata hai tabhi to ye confidence hai…
agar itna highly qualified hote to BPSC ke piche nahi bhagte… aur aapke liye ek suggestion hai ye BLOG hum 400 logo ka hai yaha aap jaise do number ke logo ka koi jagah nahi hai…. gad phati hai tabhi to is BLOG par sale chipe hue hai updates lene ke liye….
Kya karein Singhjee (V.K.) mein to un 15135 mein nahi hoon aur sayad kabhi ho bhi nahi pawoon un logon ke tarah par mujhe aap ke soch par taras ati hai jahan ladna chahiye wahan to bolenge nahi aaj se 7 sal pahle kash aap bole hote, aaj jab thoda bihar mein imandari dekhne ko mil rahi hai toaap jaise paise wale log garib padhne walon ke marne par lage hein, waise mein apko bahut acchi tarah se janta hoon, pahle to doston ke sath form bhara taki sath mein aa jaye to beda par ho jaye maths aur science to apko ek akshar ata nahi hai, par Nitishjee ke wajah se is bar roll no aur sitting code alag ho gaya isliye nahi hone se aap bokhlaye hue hein………..aap jaise log sare system ka majak bana ke rakhein hein………aplog sirf bade bade batein hi kar saktein hein………….Singh saheb station par meri chay ki dukan hai aap aiye detail mein baat kareinge………..for God sake dont talk about justice, malpractice etc aplogon ke wajah se sara forward community badnam hai
jab aap un 15135 baccho me nahi hai aur jaisa ki aapne kaha ki aap ho bhi nahi sakte to es blog par kyu latke hue hai janab…
accha hoga ki aap apne station ki chay ki dukan par dhayan de aur nitish jee ke kiye development ka news pratidin newspaper me padhe aur mala jape…aur aap kar bhi kya sakte hai station ki chay ki dukan se…
Sorry sagar. Kisi chutiye ne mere naam se comment likh diya hai.bhosriwalon dam hai to apne naam se comment likho. Gand phar dunga saale gandi nali ka kida.
lagta hai ki vk singh sach me hi pagal hai..sayad unhe pata nahi ki gandi nale ke kide kon hai..
jaise har pagal kahta hai ki main pagal nahi hu thik waise hi vk singh ko bhi sade protest karne wale gandi nali ke kide hi lagte hai…matlab aap log samaj hi gaye honge….
tadas aata hai vk singh ke sanskar par jise unhone apne family se paya hai aur ummed karta hu ki unke pariwar me gali dene ki hi parampara hai…
All the student will be rewarded by 9 marks and the cutoff will be same
When will be mains?
What type of experts are these fellows? Regarding Commonwealth Games question. This question needed to be deleted.They do not know that in shooting’s team events India won 3 silver medals, leave aside other discipline like Table tennis, etc. Regarding this neither reference book is needed nor NCERT. There would not had been any loop-holes to delay the process.They do not know difference between team event and mixed event. If they could have rectified their mistakes properly then this process would not have got delayed! We could have appeared for mains.Even I got this answer wrong because max. in team event was 2 medals as per their option so I chose that but as per their key it is only 1. Thus successful aspirants are also sufferers! Ab in experts ke bharoose judiciary bhi sab kuchh chhor diya!
Is blog pe aakar kuch jaankar loogon se aage kya hoga jaanne ki chahat hoti hai
RAJ , pagal to tum ho chutiye.
Kishore Bhai saheb aap sach mein naam ke anusar abhi bhi kishor hi hein………..apko maloom hona chahiye ki bolne ko leker aap court nahi ja saktein hein nahi to aap apne pitajee ke paise par wo bhi karte……..mein to chai pila kar kama leta hoon aap apna sochiye apko blog par likhne ke liye bhi ghar se paisa lena padta hai isliye apne ghar ka paisa galat chijon mein mat phekiye aur mein bata ta hoon ki koi bhi is exam mein malpractice nahi hua hai age ka pata nahi………………..aap mere dukan ke aage khaini becheange kya? Kishorjeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
V.K. Bhai u need not to be sorry since jo Raj hai wahi Kishor hai aur Kishorjee ne hi apke naam pe comment mere liye likha tha, aur kisi ne mere naam par (ho sakta hai koi aur Sagar ho) 9 marks dene ke liye likha hai. Kishor bhai mujhe maloom hai aap mithapur me tarkari bechtein hai, order mobile aur internet pe letein hein
Mains gaya tel lane, pahle court se mamla to bahar aye…………..
beta raj tere ko mein itna pitunga ki apna naam bhool jagega.
kya vk singh gand phadne ka sarkari theka aapne liya hai??? kyu na iss subh kam ki suruat apne aur apne pariwar se suru karte hai…
yakin maniye aapki mansik durdasa kahi aapka na phad de……:)
mains pass karne ke bad itni garmi dekhaye…
abhi aapko to 15135 me aapko apni gand bachani hai..
cool down friend…..:)
gali dene ki habit chodo…
all the best….
yar,,,, SDM ki seats include hui hain kya is bar ya future me judne ke koi chances hain kya??
kya vk singh gand phadne ka sarkari theka aapne liya hai??? kyu na iss subh kam ki suruat apne aur apne pariwar se suru karte hai…
yakin maniye aapki mansik durdasa kahi aapka na phad de……:)
mains pass karne ke bad itni garmi dekhaye…
abhi aapko to 15135 me aapko apni gand bachani hai..
cool down friend…..:)
gali dene ki habit chodo…
all the best….
.
kya vk singh gand phadne ka sarkari theka aapne liya hai??? kyu na iss subh kam ki suruat apne aur apne pariwar se suru karte hai…
yakin maniye aapki mansik durdasa kahi aapka na phad de……:)
mains pass karne ke bad itni garmi dekhaye…
abhi aapko to 15135 me aapko apni gand bachani hai..
cool down friend…..:)
gali dene ki habit chodo…
all the best….
.
dosto jaise narial ko phad kar humlog uska fruit part khate hai thik wase hi VK SINGH jee ko gand phadne ka jada hi swakh hai har bat par gand phad dunga, gand phar dunga…lagta hai vk bhai ko gand phad kar guhh(potty) khane ka bahut mann karta hai…:)
kya taste develop kiya hai…badhai ho vk singh jee ko….. logo ka gand phate rahea aur different different type ka guhh khate jayea….
jai ho….
friends some characterless people have spoilt this blog by there abusive language….. sagar, raj, vk singh and some more…..
Beta raj sagar ke naam se kyon likhte ho. Sagar is my frnd.
tab to mil baat kar khao na vk singh sagar ke saath.
kam pare to phir gaand phar dena
tab to mil baat kar khao na vk singh sagar ke saath.
kam pare to phir gaand phar dena
Raj(kishore) main Vk singh aur apni taraf se aapse haat jod kar mafi mangta hu,hum glat the
9 jan ki hearning mi kya hua koi btaiye….??? plz tell…..
9 january ko jo court me hearing tha uska kya hua…?ya ye sirf ek rumar tha..?plz update
ajay jee 9th ko hearing nahi huee hai. strike tha.
10th jan ko purani cause list par sunwaaee hogi.
thank you
thanks dear
Raj ji ,kya hoga 10th ki hearing mein,aap logo ki mnehnat se hum sabhi bacho ka bhalo hoga,I am deeply regret to use all the harsh word for you,Vk singh ji ab aap bhi raj ji se maafi mng lijiye,ye to genuine adami hain
there is no news of any LPA being filed. i guess it is just a rumour. please let me knw the LPA No. if it is really filed.